Literature DB >> 30879324

Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units.

David D Berg1, Erin A Bohula1, Sean van Diepen2, Jason N Katz3, Carlos L Alviar4, Vivian M Baird-Zars1, Christopher F Barnett5, Gregory W Barsness6, James A Burke7, Paul C Cremer8, Jennifer Cruz9, Lori B Daniels10, Andrew P DeFilippis11, Affan Haleem7, Steven M Hollenberg9, James M Horowitz12, Norma Keller12, Michael C Kontos13, Patrick R Lawler14, Venu Menon8, Thomas S Metkus15, Jason Ng12, Ryan Orgel3, Christopher B Overgaard14, Jeong-Gun Park1, Nicholas Phreaner10, Robert O Roswell12, Steven P Schulman15, R Jeffrey Snell16, Michael A Solomon17, Bradley Ternus6, Wayne Tymchak2, Fnu Vikram7, David A Morrow1.   

Abstract

Background Clinical investigations of shock in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) have primarily focused on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Few studies have evaluated the full spectrum of shock in contemporary CICUs. Methods and Results The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter network of advanced CICUs in North America. Anytime between September 2017 and September 2018, each center (n=16) contributed a 2-month snap-shot of all consecutive medical admissions to the CICU. Data were submitted to the central coordinating center (TIMI Study Group, Boston, MA). Shock was defined as sustained systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg with end-organ dysfunction ascribed to the hypotension. Shock type was classified by site investigators as cardiogenic, distributive, hypovolemic, or mixed. Among 3049 CICU admissions, 677 (22%) met clinical criteria for shock. Shock type was varied, with 66% assessed as cardiogenic shock (CS), 7% as distributive, 3% as hypovolemic, 20% as mixed, and 4% as unknown. Among patients with CS (n=450), 30% had AMICS, 18% had ischemic cardiomyopathy without AMI, 28% had nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 17% had a cardiac cause other than primary myocardial dysfunction. Patients with mixed shock had cardiovascular comorbidities similar to patients with CS. The median CICU stay was 4.0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5-8.1 days) for AMICS, 4.3 days (IQR, 2.1-8.5 days) for CS not related to AMI, and 5.8 days (IQR, 2.9-10.0 days) for mixed shock versus 1.9 days (IQR, 1.0-3.6) for patients without shock ( P<0.01 for each). Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were higher in patients with mixed shock (10; IQR, 6-13) versus AMICS (8; IQR, 5-11) or CS without AMI (7; IQR, 5-11; each P<0.01). In-hospital mortality rates were 36% (95% CI, 28%-45%), 31% (95% CI, 26%-36%), and 39% (95% CI, 31%-48%) in AMICS, CS without AMI, and mixed shock, respectively. Conclusions The epidemiology of shock in contemporary advanced CICUs is varied, and AMICS now represents less than one-third of all CS. Despite advanced therapies, mortality in CS and mixed shock remains high. Investigation of management strategies and new therapies to treat shock in the CICU should take this epidemiology into account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  North America; cardiogenic shock; epidemiology; hypotension; intensive care units

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30879324     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  40 in total

1.  Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.

Authors:  David D Berg; Christopher F Barnett; Benjamin B Kenigsberg; Alexander Papolos; Carlos L Alviar; Vivian M Baird-Zars; Gregory W Barsness; Erin A Bohula; Joseph Brennan; James A Burke; Anthony P Carnicelli; Sunit-Preet Chaudhry; Paul C Cremer; Lori B Daniels; Andrew P DeFilippis; Daniel A Gerber; Christopher B Granger; Steven Hollenberg; James M Horowitz; James D Gladden; Jason N Katz; Ellen C Keeley; Norma Keller; Michael C Kontos; Patrick R Lawler; Venu Menon; Thomas S Metkus; P Elliott Miller; Jose Nativi-Nicolau; L Kristin Newby; Jeong-Gun Park; Nicholas Phreaner; Robert O Roswell; Steven P Schulman; Shashank S Sinha; R Jeffrey Snell; Michael A Solomon; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Wayne Tymchak; Sean van Diepen; David A Morrow
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 2.  Pathophysiology and Advanced Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Michael I Brener; Hannah R Rosenblum; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

3.  Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Carlos L Alviar; Stuart D Katz; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Epidemiology of Cardiogenic Shock in Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19: A Report From the American Heart Association COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry.

Authors:  Anubodh S Varshney; Wally A Omar; Dhruv S Kazi; Erin A Bohula; Erica L Goodrich; Ankeet S Bhatt; Ann E Wolley; Jingyi Gong; Balimkiz C Senman; Danuzia Silva; Michael W Levangie; David D Berg; Robert W Yeh; James A de Lemos; David A Morrow
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 8.790

5.  Use of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Management of Cardiogenic Shock Before and After the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Heart Allocation System Changes.

Authors:  Anubodh S Varshney; David D Berg; Jason N Katz; Vivian M Baird-Zars; Erin A Bohula; Anthony P Carnicelli; Sunit-Preet Chaudhry; Jianping Guo; Patrick R Lawler; Jose Nativi-Nicolau; Shashank S Sinha; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Sean van Diepen; David A Morrow
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 6.  Systems of Care in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Maria M Patarroyo Aponte; Carlos Manrique; Biswajit Kar
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

7.  Epidemiology of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest complicating non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 18-year US study.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Jacob C Jentzer; Abhiram Prasad; Lindsey R Sangaralingham; Kianoush Kashani; Nilay D Shah; Shannon M Dunlay
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-04-09

8.  Predicting survival in patients with acute decompensated heart failure complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Nuccia Morici; Giovanna Viola; Laura Antolini; Gianfranco Alicandro; Michela Dal Martello; Alice Sacco; Maurizio Bottiroli; Federico Pappalardo; Luca Villanova; Laura De Ponti; Carlo La Vecchia; Maria Frigerio; Fabrizio Oliva; Justin Fried; Paolo Colombo; Arthur Reshad Garan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 9.  Overview of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) Support for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Adamantios Tsangaris; Tamas Alexy; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Andrea Elliott; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-07

10.  Association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jiali Jin; Zhewei Shi; Xiaomin Pang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.