Literature DB >> 32277478

Automated glioma grading on conventional MRI images using deep convolutional neural networks.

Ying Zhuge1, Holly Ning1, Peter Mathen1, Jason Y Cheng1, Andra V Krauze2, Kevin Camphausen1, Robert W Miller1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gliomas are the most common primary tumor of the brain and are classified into grades I-IV of the World Health Organization (WHO), based on their invasively histological appearance. Gliomas grading plays an important role to determine the treatment plan and prognosis prediction. In this study we propose two novel methods for automatic, non-invasively distinguishing low-grade (Grades II and III) glioma (LGG) and high-grade (grade IV) glioma (HGG) on conventional MRI images by using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs).
METHODS: All MRI images have been preprocessed first by rigid image registration and intensity inhomogeneity correction. Both proposed methods consist of two steps: (a) three-dimensional (3D) brain tumor segmentation based on a modification of the popular U-Net model; (b) tumor classification on segmented brain tumor. In the first method, the slice with largest area of tumor is determined and the state-of-the-art mask R-CNN model is employed for tumor grading. To improve the performance of the grading model, a two-dimensional (2D) data augmentation has been implemented to increase both the amount and the diversity of the training images. In the second method, denoted as 3DConvNet, a 3D volumetric CNNs is applied directly on bounding image regions of segmented tumor for classification, which can fully leverage the 3D spatial contextual information of volumetric image data.
RESULTS: The proposed schemes were evaluated on The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) low grade glioma (LGG) data, and the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation (BraTS) Benchmark 2018 training datasets with fivefold cross validation. All data are divided into training, validation, and test sets. Based on biopsy-proven ground truth, the performance metrics of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are measured on the test sets. The results are 0.935 (sensitivity), 0.972 (specificity), and 0.963 (accuracy) for the 2D Mask R-CNN based method, and 0.947 (sensitivity), 0.968 (specificity), and 0.971 (accuracy) for the 3DConvNet method, respectively. In regard to efficiency, for 3D brain tumor segmentation, the program takes around ten and a half hours for training with 300 epochs on BraTS 2018 dataset and takes only around 50 s for testing of a typical image with a size of 160 × 216 × 176. For 2D Mask R-CNN based tumor grading, the program takes around 4 h for training with around 60 000 iterations, and around 1 s for testing of a 2D slice image with size of 128 × 128. For 3DConvNet based tumor grading, the program takes around 2 h for training with 10 000 iterations, and 0.25 s for testing of a 3D cropped image with size of 64 × 64 × 64, using a DELL PRECISION Tower T7910, with two NVIDIA Titan Xp GPUs.
CONCLUSIONS: Two effective glioma grading methods on conventional MRI images using deep convolutional neural networks have been developed. Our methods are fully automated without manual specification of region-of-interests and selection of slices for model training, which are common in traditional machine learning based brain tumor grading methods. This methodology may play a crucial role in selecting effective treatment options and survival predictions without the need for surgical biopsy.
© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glioma grading; MRI image; brain tumor; convolutional neural networks; deep learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32277478      PMCID: PMC8494136          DOI: 10.1002/mp.14168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.506


  29 in total

Review 1.  Brain tumors.

Authors:  L M DeAngelis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology.

Authors:  S Cha
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Data-driven grading of brain gliomas: a multiparametric MR imaging study.

Authors:  Massimo Caulo; Valentina Panara; Domenico Tortora; Peter A Mattei; Chiara Briganti; Emanuele Pravatà; Simone Salice; Antonio R Cotroneo; Armando Tartaro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features.

Authors:  Spyridon Bakas; Hamed Akbari; Aristeidis Sotiras; Michel Bilello; Martin Rozycki; Justin S Kirby; John B Freymann; Keyvan Farahani; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization.

Authors:  L G Nyúl; J K Udupa; X Zhang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Survival analysis of patients with high-grade gliomas based on data mining of imaging variables.

Authors:  E I Zacharaki; N Morita; P Bhatt; D M O'Rourke; E R Melhem; C Davatzikos
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Predictive modeling in glioma grading from MR perfusion images using support vector machines.

Authors:  Kyrre E Emblem; Frank G Zoellner; Bjorn Tennoe; Baard Nedregaard; Terje Nome; Paulina Due-Tonnessen; John K Hald; David Scheie; Atle Bjornerud
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme.

Authors:  Evangelia I Zacharaki; Sumei Wang; Sanjeev Chawla; Dong Soo Yoo; Ronald Wolf; Elias R Melhem; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Automated classification of short echo time in in vivo 1H brain tumor spectra: a multicenter study.

Authors:  A Rosemary Tate; Carles Majós; Angel Moreno; Franklyn A Howe; John R Griffiths; Carles Arús
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Computer-Aided Grading of Gliomas Combining Automatic Segmentation and Radiomics.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Boqiang Liu; Suting Peng; Jiawei Sun; Xu Qiao
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2018-05-08
View more
  18 in total

1.  Machine Learning-Based Radiomics Predicting Tumor Grades and Expression of Multiple Pathologic Biomarkers in Gliomas.

Authors:  Min Gao; Siying Huang; Xuequn Pan; Xuan Liao; Ru Yang; Jun Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Detection and Grading of Gliomas Using a Novel Two-Phase Machine Learning Method Based on MRI Images.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Feng Xiao; Zunpeng Yu; Mengxue Yuan; Haibo Xu; Long Lu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Brain Tumor Imaging: Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Muhammad Afridi; Abhi Jain; Mariam Aboian; Seyedmehdi Payabvash
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.875

4.  Classification of brain tumours in MR images using deep spatiospatial models.

Authors:  Soumick Chatterjee; Faraz Ahmed Nizamani; Andreas Nürnberger; Oliver Speck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in the Imaging of Gliomas: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ayman S Alhasan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-14

Review 6.  Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics.

Authors:  Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Quantitative MRI-based radiomics for noninvasively predicting molecular subtypes and survival in glioma patients.

Authors:  Jing Yan; Bin Zhang; Shuaitong Zhang; Jingliang Cheng; Xianzhi Liu; Weiwei Wang; Yuhao Dong; Lu Zhang; Xiaokai Mo; Qiuying Chen; Jin Fang; Fei Wang; Jie Tian; Shuixing Zhang; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-07-26

8.  Phase II trial of proton therapy versus photon IMRT for GBM: secondary analysis comparison of progression-free survival between RANO versus clinical assessment.

Authors:  Karine A Al Feghali; James W Randall; Diane D Liu; Jeffrey S Wefel; Paul D Brown; David R Grosshans; Sarah A McAvoy; Maguy A Farhat; Jing Li; Susan L McGovern; Mary F McAleer; Amol J Ghia; Arnold C Paulino; Erik P Sulman; Marta Penas-Prado; Jihong Wang; John de Groot; Amy B Heimberger; Terri S Armstrong; Mark R Gilbert; Anita Mahajan; Nandita Guha-Thakurta; Caroline Chung
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 9.  Application of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis of Craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Caijie Qin; Wenxing Hu; Xinsheng Wang; Xibo Ma
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Fully Automated MR Based Virtual Biopsy of Cerebral Gliomas.

Authors:  Johannes Haubold; René Hosch; Vicky Parmar; Martin Glas; Nika Guberina; Onofrio Antonio Catalano; Daniela Pierscianek; Karsten Wrede; Cornelius Deuschl; Michael Forsting; Felix Nensa; Nils Flaschel; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.