Literature DB >> 19859947

Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme.

Evangelia I Zacharaki1, Sumei Wang, Sanjeev Chawla, Dong Soo Yoo, Ronald Wolf, Elias R Melhem, Christos Davatzikos.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the use of pattern classification methods for distinguishing different types of brain tumors, such as primary gliomas from metastases, and also for grading of gliomas. The availability of an automated computer analysis tool that is more objective than human readers can potentially lead to more reliable and reproducible brain tumor diagnostic procedures. A computer-assisted classification method combining conventional MRI and perfusion MRI is developed and used for differential diagnosis. The proposed scheme consists of several steps including region-of-interest definition, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification. The extracted features include tumor shape and intensity characteristics, as well as rotation invariant texture features. Feature subset selection is performed using support vector machines with recursive feature elimination. The method was applied on a population of 102 brain tumors histologically diagnosed as metastasis (24), meningiomas (4), gliomas World Health Organization grade II (22), gliomas World Health Organization grade III (18), and glioblastomas (34). The binary support vector machine classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation, were, respectively, 85%, 87%, and 79% for discrimination of metastases from gliomas and 88%, 85%, and 96% for discrimination of high-grade (grades III and IV) from low-grade (grade II) neoplasms. Multiclass classification was also performed via a one-vs-all voting scheme. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19859947      PMCID: PMC2863141          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  31 in total

Review 1.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Bagging linear sparse Bayesian learning models for variable selection in cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Chuan Lu; Andy Devos; Johan A K Suykens; Carles Arús; Sabine Van Huffel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2007-05

3.  Nonlinear operator for oriented texture.

Authors:  P Kruizinga; N Petkov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  Effects of MRI acquisition parameter variations and protocol heterogeneity on the results of texture analysis and pattern discrimination: an application-oriented study.

Authors:  Marius E Mayerhoefer; Pavol Szomolanyi; Daniel Jirak; Andrzej Materka; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Different vascular patterns of medulloblastoma and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors.

Authors:  R H Goldbrunner; T Pietsch; G H Vince; J J Bernstein; S Wagner; H Hageman; D M Selby; J Krauss; N Soerensen; J C Tonn
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  1999 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 2.457

6.  Brain tumor classification by proton MR spectroscopy: comparison of diagnostic accuracy at short and long TE.

Authors:  Carles Majós; Margarida Julià-Sapé; Juli Alonso; Marta Serrallonga; Carles Aguilera; Juan J Acebes; Carles Arús; Jaume Gili
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected].

Authors:  Michael H Lev; Yelda Ozsunar; John W Henson; Amjad A Rasheed; Glenn D Barest; Griffith R Harsh; Markus M Fitzek; E Antonio Chiocca; James D Rabinov; Andrew N Csavoy; Bruce R Rosen; Fred H Hochberg; Pamela W Schaefer; R Gilberto Gonzalez
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Intraaxial brain masses: MR imaging-based diagnostic strategy--initial experience.

Authors:  Riyadh N Al-Okaili; Jaroslaw Krejza; John H Woo; Ronald L Wolf; Donald M O'Rourke; Kevin D Judy; Harish Poptani; Elias R Melhem
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Non-diffeomorphic registration of brain tumor images by simulating tissue loss and tumor growth.

Authors:  Evangelia I Zacharaki; Cosmina S Hogea; Dinggang Shen; George Biros; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Improving brain tumor characterization on MRI by probabilistic neural networks and non-linear transformation of textural features.

Authors:  Pantelis Georgiadis; Dionisis Cavouras; Ioannis Kalatzis; Antonis Daskalakis; George C Kagadis; Koralia Sifaki; Menelaos Malamas; George Nikiforidis; Ekaterini Solomou
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  150 in total

1.  Classification of sodium MRI data of cartilage using machine learning.

Authors:  Guillaume Madelin; Frederick Poidevin; Antonios Makrymallis; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  New similarity search based glioma grading.

Authors:  Katrin Haegler; Martin Wiesmann; Christian Böhm; Jessica Freiherr; Oliver Schnell; Hartmut Brückmann; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Jennifer Linn
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Investigating machine learning techniques for MRI-based classification of brain neoplasms.

Authors:  Evangelia I Zacharaki; Vasileios G Kanas; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Texture analysis: a review of neurologic MR imaging applications.

Authors:  A Kassner; R E Thornhill
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  A Type-2 Fuzzy Image Processing Expert System for Diagnosing Brain Tumors.

Authors:  M Zarinbal; M H Fazel Zarandi; I B Turksen; M Izadi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging texture predicts progression to dementia due to Alzheimer disease earlier than hippocampal volume

Authors:  Subin Lee; Hyunna Lee; Ki Woong Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.186

7.  Surface Foliation Based Brain Morphometry Analysis.

Authors:  Chengfeng Wen; Na Lei; Ming Ma; Xin Qi; Wen Zhang; Yalin Wang; Xianfeng Gu
Journal:  Multimodal Brain Image Anal Math Found Comput Anat (2019)       Date:  2019-10-10

8.  Control-group feature normalization for multivariate pattern analysis of structural MRI data using the support vector machine.

Authors:  Kristin A Linn; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Jimit Doshi; Christos Davatzikos; Russell T Shinohara
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Post-gadolinium 3-dimensional spatial, surface, and structural characteristics of glioblastomas differentiate pseudoprogression from true tumor progression.

Authors:  Madison R Hansen; Edward Pan; Andrew Wilson; Morgan McCreary; Yeqi Wang; Thomas Stanley; Marco C Pinho; Xiaohu Guo; Darin T Okuda
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Exploring Variability in CT Characterization of Tumors: A Preliminary Phantom Study.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao; Yongqiang Tan; Wei Yann Tsai; Lawrence H Schwartz; Lin Lu
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.