Literature DB >> 32274669

Efficacy of Single-Strain Probiotics Versus Multi-Strain Mixtures: Systematic Review of Strain and Disease Specificity.

Lynne V McFarland1.   

Abstract

The diversity of probiotic products makes choosing an appropriate probiotic challenging. One unanswered question is whether single-strain probiotics are more effective than multi-strain mixtures. The aim of this review is to account for both disease and strain specificity to determine whether single strains or multiple strains are equivalent or more effective. This literature review of randomized controlled trials from 1973 to 2019 was used to compare the pooled efficacy of trials with a single strain versus the probiotic mixture with same matched strain within the same type of disease indication. A total of 65 RCTs were included (41 with single strains, 22 multi-strain mixtures and 2 comparing single strain to mixture arms) for eight different disease indications (N = 10,863). Only three strains (L. rhamnosus GG, L. helveticus R52 and B. lactis Bb12) had corresponding trials with matching mixtures. Use of L. rhamnosus GG only was significantly more protective for necrotizing enterocolitis compared to two mixtures also containing different strains of B. lactis. The mixture of L. rhamnosus GG and B. lactis Bb12 was significantly more effective than L. rhamnosus GG alone for the eradication of H. pylori. In most cases, single strains were equivalent to mixtures. Choice of an appropriate probiotic should be based, not on the number of strains in the product, rather based on evidence-based trials of efficacy. In most cases, multi-strain mixtures were not significantly more effective than single-strain probiotics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic-associated diarrhea; H. pylori; Necrotizing enterocolitis; Probiotics; Randomized controlled trials; Strain specificity

Year:  2020        PMID: 32274669     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06244-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  71 in total

Review 1.  Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics--A comparison of functionality and efficacy.

Authors:  H M Timmerman; C J M Koning; L Mulder; F M Rombouts; A C Beynen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  In vitro evaluation of single- and multi-strain probiotics: Inter-species inhibition between probiotic strains, and inhibition of pathogens.

Authors:  C M C Chapman; G R Gibson; I Rowland
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.331

Review 3.  Single Probiotic versus Multiple Probiotics - A Debate On Current Scenario for Alleviating Health Benefits.

Authors:  Siva K Korada; Nagendra S Yarla; Vijayendra Mishra; Mohamed A Daim; Bechan Sharma; Ashraf Gm; Reggi R; Palmery M; Ilaria Peluso; Mohammad A Kamal
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Effectiveness of Multistrain Versus Single-strain Probiotics: Current Status and Recommendations for the Future.

Authors:  Arthur C Ouwehand; Marcos M Invernici; Flávia A C Furlaneto; Michel R Messora
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  The mucus binding of Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 is enhanced in the presence of Lactobacillus GG and Lact. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus.

Authors:  A C Ouwehand; E Isolauri; P V Kirjavainen; S Tölkko; S J Salminen
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.858

6.  Differential immunomodulatory properties of Bifidobacterium logum strains: relevance to probiotic selection and clinical applications.

Authors:  M Medina; E Izquierdo; S Ennahar; Y Sanz
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Comparison of the immunomodulatory properties of three probiotic strains of Lactobacilli using complex culture systems: prediction for in vivo efficacy.

Authors:  Erika Mileti; Gianluca Matteoli; Iliyan D Iliev; Maria Rescigno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pooling data on different probiotics is not appropriate to assess the efficacy of probiotics.

Authors:  Hania Szajewska
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Choosing an appropriate probiotic product for your patient: An evidence-based practical guide.

Authors:  Jason C Sniffen; Lynne V McFarland; Charlesnika T Evans; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Simulating colonic survival of probiotics in single-strain products compared to multi-strain products.

Authors:  S D Forssten; A C Ouwehand
Journal:  Microb Ecol Health Dis       Date:  2017-10-17
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Current Status of Probiotics for Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Mangesh Deshmukh; Sanjay Patole
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Short-Term Tolerability, Safety, and Gut Microbial Composition Responses to a Multi-Strain Probiotic Supplement: An Open-Label Study in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer Joan Ryan; Noelle M Patno
Journal:  Integr Med (Encinitas)       Date:  2021-02

3.  [Isolation, identification and safety evaluation of Lactobacillus gasseri strain LGV03 isolated from the vagina of healthy women].

Authors:  B Su; L Cao; J Zheng; L Zhang; Z Zhang; F Qiu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 4.  Modifying the diet and gut microbiota to prevent and manage neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Ellen J Gates; Anna K Bernath; Andis Klegeris
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.703

Review 5.  Effects of Microbiota Imbalance in Anxiety and Eating Disorders: Probiotics as Novel Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Elisabet Navarro-Tapia; Laura Almeida-Toledano; Giorgia Sebastiani; Mariona Serra-Delgado; Óscar García-Algar; Vicente Andreu-Fernández
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Exoproteome Analysis of Antagonistic Interactions between the Probiotic Bacteria Limosilactobacillus reuteri LR1 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus F and Multidrug Resistant Strain of Klebsiella pneumonia.

Authors:  Olga S Savinova; Olga A Glazunova; Konstantin V Moiseenko; Anna V Begunova; Irina V Rozhkova; Tatyana V Fedorova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Lactic Acid Bacteria Mixture Isolated From Wild Pig Alleviated the Gut Inflammation of Mice Challenged by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Yifan Zhong; Dongyan Fu; Zhaoxi Deng; Wenjie Tang; Jiangdi Mao; Tao Zhu; Yu Zhang; Jianxin Liu; Haifeng Wang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Lactobacillus acidophilus novel strain, MJCD175, as a potential probiotic for oral health in dogs.

Authors:  Inhwan You; Feriel Yasmine Mahiddine; Heekee Park; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-02

9.  Validity and safety of ID-JPL934 in lower gastrointestinal symptom improvement.

Authors:  Cheol Min Shin; Yoon Jin Choi; Dong Ho Lee; Jin Seok Moon; Tae-Yoon Kim; Yoon-Keun Kim; Won-Hee Lee; Hyuk Yoon; Young Soo Park; Nayoung Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Antimicrobial susceptibilities and comparative whole genome analysis of two isolates of the probiotic bacterium Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, strain ATCC 202195.

Authors:  Lisa G Pell; Rachael G Horne; Stuart Huntley; Hafizur Rahman; Sanchita Kar; Mohammad Shahidul Islam; Kara C Evans; Samir K Saha; Aaron Campigotto; Shaun K Morris; Daniel E Roth; Philip M Sherman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.