Literature DB >> 22677262

In vitro evaluation of single- and multi-strain probiotics: Inter-species inhibition between probiotic strains, and inhibition of pathogens.

C M C Chapman1, G R Gibson, I Rowland.   

Abstract

Many studies comparing the effects of single- and multi-strain probiotics on pathogen inhibition compare treatments with different concentrations. They also do not examine the possibility of inhibition between probiotic strains with a mixture. We tested the ability of 14 single-species probiotics to inhibit each other using a cross-streak assay, and agar spot test. We then tested the ability of 15 single-species probiotics and 5 probiotic mixtures to inhibit Clostridium difficile, Escherichia coli and S. typhimurium, using the agar spot test. Testing was done with mixtures created in two ways: one group contained component species incubated together, the other group of mixtures was made using component species which had been incubated separately, equalised to equal optical density, and then mixed in equal volumes. Inhibition was observed for all combinations of probiotics, suggesting that when used as such there may be inhibition between probiotics, potentially reducing efficacy of the mixture. Significant inter-species variation was seen against each pathogen. When single species were tested against mixtures, the multi-species preparations displayed significantly (p < 0.05 or less) greater inhibition of pathogens in 12 out of 24 cases. Despite evidence that probiotic species will inhibit each other when incubated together in vitro, in many cases a probiotic mixture was more effective at inhibiting pathogens than its component species when tested at approximately equal concentrations of biomass. This suggests that using a probiotic mixture might be more effective at reducing gastrointestinal infections, and that creating a mixture using species with different effects against different pathogens may have a broader spectrum of action that a single provided by a single strain.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22677262     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  26 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of Single-Strain Probiotics Versus Multi-Strain Mixtures: Systematic Review of Strain and Disease Specificity.

Authors:  Lynne V McFarland
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Lack of Heterogeneity in Bacteriocin Production Across a Selection of Commercial Probiotic Products.

Authors:  J W Hegarty; C M Guinane; R P Ross; C Hill; P D Cotter
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Assessing inhibitory activity of probiotic culture supernatants against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a comparative methodology between agar diffusion, broth culture and microcalorimetry.

Authors:  Mansa Fredua-Agyeman; Simon Gaisford
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Probiotic prophylaxis to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in children on mechanical ventilation: an open-label randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Balasubramaniam Banupriya; Niranjan Biswal; Rangan Srinivasaraghavan; Parameswaran Narayanan; Jharna Mandal
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Carcinogenesis and therapeutics: the microbiota perspective.

Authors:  Matthew C B Tsilimigras; Anthony Fodor; Christian Jobin
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 17.745

6.  Isolation and Selection of Potential Probiotic Bacteria from the Pig Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Luca Lo Verso; Martin Lessard; Guylaine Talbot; Benoit Fernandez; Ismail Fliss
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Probiotic Lactobacilli Administration Induces Changes in the Fecal Microbiota of Preweaned Dairy Calves.

Authors:  Sofía Fernández-Ciganda; Martín Fraga; Pablo Zunino
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 5.265

8.  Comparative in vitro inhibition of urinary tract pathogens by single- and multi-strain probiotics.

Authors:  C M C Chapman; G R Gibson; S Todd; I Rowland
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 9.  Intra- and inter-species interactions within biofilms of important foodborne bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Efstathios Giaouris; Even Heir; Mickaël Desvaux; Michel Hébraud; Trond Møretrø; Solveig Langsrud; Agapi Doulgeraki; George-John Nychas; Miroslava Kačániová; Katarzyna Czaczyk; Hülya Ölmez; Manuel Simões
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Survival and synergistic growth of mixed cultures of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli combined with prebiotic oligosaccharides in a gastrointestinal tract simulator.

Authors:  Signe Adamberg; Ingrid Sumeri; Riin Uusna; Padma Ambalam; Kanthi Kiran Kondepudi; Kaarel Adamberg; Torkel Wadström; Asa Ljungh
Journal:  Microb Ecol Health Dis       Date:  2014-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.