| Literature DB >> 32272905 |
Garang Dakjur Lueth1, Angesom Kebede2, Araya Abrha Medhanyie3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Induction of labor refers to iatrogenic stimulation of uterine contractions before the onset of spontaneous labor as a therapeutic option when benefits of expeditious delivery outweigh the risks of continuing the pregnancy. This research was to study the prevalence, outcomes and associated factors of labor induction among women delivered at Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital and Mekelle general hospital in Mekelle town, Tigray, North Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Bishop’s score; Indication; Induction of labor; Misoprostol; Outcome; Prevalence; Ripening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32272905 PMCID: PMC7147044 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-02862-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007

Fig. 1: schematic presentation of sampling procedure.
Bishop Score
| Score | Dilation | Effacement (%) | Stationa | Consistency | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | closed | 00–30 | −3 | Firm | posterior |
| 1 | 1–2 | 40–50 | −2 | medium | Mid position |
| 2 | 3–4 | 60–70 | −1,0 | soft | Anterior |
| 3 | ≥ 5 | ≥ 80 | + 1, + 2 |
aStation is graded from −3 to + 3
Interpretation of the Bishop’s score:
Score < 4: Unfavorable cervix
Score 5–8: Intermediate
Score ≥ 9: Favorable cervix
Modified from the Ethiopian National Guideline
Schedule for oxytocin dosage escalation
| Dose and oxytocin concentration | Time | Drops / minute | Approximate oxytocin in mIU/ minute |
|---|---|---|---|
First dose: 5 IU of oxytocin in 1000 ml fluid | 0:00 h | 20 | 2 |
| 0:30 h | 40 | 4 | |
| 1:00 h | 60 | 6 | |
| 1:30 h | 80 | 8 | |
Second dose: Add another 5 IU of oxytocin to the remaining first dose fluid | 2:00 h | 50 | 12 |
| 2:30 h | 60 | 15 | |
| 3:00 h | 80 | 20 | |
Third dose: Add another 5 IU of oxytocin on the remaining second dose fluid | 3:30 h | 50 | 24 |
| 4:00 h | 60 | 30 | |
| 4:30 h | 80 | 40 | |
| 5:00 h | As above | As above | |
| 5:30 h | As above | As above |
Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants (N = 346)
| Variables | NO | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age in Years | Mean (SD) | 26.8 (5.0) | – |
| < 20 | 7 | 2.0 | |
| 20–34 | 310 | 89.6 | |
| ≥ 35 | 29 | 8.4 | |
| Ethnicity | Tigray | 341 | 98.6 |
| Amhara | 2 | 0.6 | |
| Afar | 3 | 0.9 | |
| Place of residence | Rural | 112 | 32.4 |
| Urban | 234 | 67.6 | |
| Participant’s level of education | Uneducated | 36 | 10.4 |
| Primary | 104 | 30.1 | |
| Secondary | 111 | 32.1 | |
| Tertiary Education | 95 | 27.5 | |
| Participants occupation | Student | 9 | 2.6 |
| Self employed | 42 | 12.1 | |
| Civil Servant | 125 | 36.1 | |
| House wife | 170 | 49.1 | |
| Average family monthly income | Mean + SD | 4169.4 + 2130 | |
| Minimum | 700 | – | |
| Maximum | 14,000 | ||
| Mean | 4169.4 | ||
Obstetrics and physical examination findings characteristics of the participants (N = 346)
| Variables | NO | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parity | Para I | 181 | 52.3 |
| Para II - IV | 127 | 36.7 | |
| Para V& above | 38 | 11 | |
| Gestational age | Preterm | 43 | 12.4 |
| Term | 225 | 65.0 | |
| Postterm | 78 | 22.5 | |
| ANC follow up | Health Centre | 124 | 35.8 |
| Public Hospital | 171 | 49.4 | |
| Private Hospital/ Clinic | 50 | 14.5 | |
| No ANC follow up | 1 | 0.3 | |
| Known medical illness | Hypertension | 6 | 1.7 |
| Diabetes | 1 | 0.3 | |
| Cardiac Disease | 1 | 0.3 | |
| None | 338 | 97.7 | |
| Indication for induction | Postterm | 68 | 19.7 |
| PROM | 143 | 41.3 | |
| APH | 18 | 5.2 | |
| Hypertensive Disorders | 57 | 16.5 | |
| IUFD | 26 | 7.5 | |
| Oligohydramnios | 29 | 8.4 | |
| IUGR | 2 | 0.6 | |
| Malformation | 3 | 0.9 | |
| Status of the fetus before induction | Dead | 32 | 9.2 |
| Alive | 314 | 90.8 | |
| Any diagnosed Malformation | Yes | 10 | 2.9 |
| No | 336 | 97.1 | |
| Specific malformation | Anencephaly | 5 | 1.4 |
| Ventriculomegally | 3 | 0.9 | |
| Achondroplasia | 1 | 0.3 | |
| Club Foot | 1 | 0.3 | |
| Bishop’s score at Admission | Favorable | 114 | 32.9 |
| Unfavorable | 232 | 67.1 | |
Methods of cervical ripening and induction
| Variables | No | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical ripening | Yes | 225 | 65 |
| ( | No | 121 | 35 |
| Ripening agent | Misoprostol | 195 | 86.7 |
| ( | Balloon catheter | 30 | 13.3 |
| Bishop’s score after cervical ripening | Favorable | 217 | 96.4 |
| Unfavorable | 8 | 3.6 | |
| Method of induction | Oxytocin | 214 | 61.8 |
| Misoprostol | 132 | 38.2 | |
| Maintenance Dose of Oxytocin ( | First dose | 17 | 7.9 |
| Second dose | 81 | 37.9 | |
| Third dose | 58 | 27.1 | |
| Maximum dose | 58 | 27.1 | |
| Induction to delivery time in hours | Mean | 8.9 | |
| Median | 8.0 | ||
| Range | 21.0 | – | |
| Minimum | 1.00 | ||
| Maximum | 22.0 | ||
Birth outcomes of induced mothers
| Birth outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | |||
| Mode of delivery ( | Vaginal | 244 | 70.5 |
| Instrumental | 19 | 5.5 | |
| Cesarean | 83 | 24.0 | |
| Failure/success of induction ( | Successful Induction | 263 | 76 |
| Failed Induction | 25 | 7.2 | |
Indications for Cesarean delivery ( | NRFHRP | 41 | 49.4 |
| CPD | 14 | 16.9 | |
| Failed Induction | 25 | 30.1 | |
| Intrapartum APH | 2 | 2.4 | |
| Secondary Arrest | 1 | 1.2 | |
| Outcome ( | Male | 182 | 52.6 |
| Female | 164 | 47.4 | |
| 5th Minutes APGAR score ( | > 7 | 276 | 88.5 |
| < 7 | 36 | 11.5 | |
Birth weight ( | < 2.5 | 55 | 15.9 |
| 2.5–3.4 | 180 | 52.0 | |
| > 3.5 | 111 | 32.1 | |
Maternal peripartum complications of induced mothers
| Maternal peripartum complications | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | |||
| Uterine over activity | Yes | 1 | 0.3 |
| No | 345 | 99.7 | |
| Precipitated labor | Yes | 7 | 2.0 |
| No | 339 | 98.0 | |
| Placental abruption | Yes | 5 | 1.4 |
| No | 341 | 98.6 | |
| Uterine rupture | Yes | 3 | 0.9 |
| No | 343 | 99.1 | |
| Postpartum Hemorrhage | Yes | 15 | 4.3 |
| No | 331 | 95.7 | |
| Maternal death | Yes | 1 | 0.3 |
| No | 345 | 99.7 | |
Peripartum complications of fetus/neonates delivered by induction
| Fetal / Neonatal peripartum complications | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | |||
| NRFHRP | Yes | 62 | 17.9 |
| No | 284 | 82.1 | |
| IUFD | Yes | 2 | 0.6 |
| No | 344 | 99.4 | |
| Low APGAR score ( | Yes | 34 | 10.9 |
| No | 278 | 89.1 | |
| Admission to NICU | Yes | 37 | 11.9 |
| No | 275 | 88.1 | |
| NICU admission Diagnosis ( | PNA | 19 | 51.4 |
| EONS | 10 | 27.0 | |
| HMD | 4 | 10.8 | |
| MAS | 4 | 10.8 | |
| Duration of stay in NICU ( | 24–72 Hours | 20 | 54.1 |
| 4–7 days | 17 | 45.9 | |
| EONS | Yes | 10 | 3.2 |
| No | 302 | 96.8 | |
| END | Yes | 4 | 1.3 |
| No | 308 | 98.7 | |
Cause of END ( | PNA | 1 | 25.0 |
| HMD | 2 | 50.0 | |
| Malformation | 1 | 25.0 | |
Obstetric characteristics in relation to the outcome of induction
| Variables | Successful induction | Failed Induction | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | < 20 | 5 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (100%) | 0.813 |
| 20–34 | 236 (91.5%) | 22 (8.5%) | 258 (100%) | ||
| ≥35 | 22 (88.0%) | 3 (12.0%) | 25 (100%) | ||
| Residence | Rural | 89 (95.7%) | 4 (4.3%) | 93 (100%) | 0.076 |
| Urban | 174 (89.2%) | 21 (10.8%) | 195 (100%) | ||
| Gravidity | Primigravida | 124 (86.7%) | 19 (13.3%) | 143 (100%) | 0.006 |
| Multigravida | 139 (95.9%) | 6 (4.1%) | 145 (100%) | ||
| Gestational Age | Preterm | 33 (89.2%) | 4 (10.8%) | 37 (100%) | 0.868 |
| Term | 169 (91.4%) | 16 (8.6%) | 185 (100%) | ||
| Postterm | 61 (92.4%) | 5 (7.6%) | 66 (100%) | ||
| Fetal status before induction | Dead | 29 (93.5%) | 2 (6.5%) | 31 (100%) | 0.754 |
| Alive | 234 (91.1%) | 23 (8.9%) | 257 (100%) | ||
| Bishop’s score at admission | Favorable | 95 (93.1%) | 7 (6.9%) | 102 (100%) | 0.517 |
| Unfavorable | 168 (90.3%) | 18 (9.7%) | 186 (100%) | ||
| Any Cervical Ripening done | Yes | 166 (91.2%) | 16 (8.8%) | 182 (100%) | 1.00 |
| No | 97 (91.5%) | 9 (8.5%) | 106 (100%) | ||
| Ripening Agent | Misoprostol | 150 (92.6%) | 12 (7.4%) | 162 (100%) | 0.081 |
| Balloon Catheter | 16 (80.0%) | 4 (20.0%) | 20 (100%) | ||
| Bishop’s score after Ripening | Favorable | 164 (93.2%) | 12 (6.8%) | 176 (100%) | 0.001 |
| Unfavorable | 2 (33.3%) | 4 (66.7%) | 6 (100%) | ||
| Method of induction | Oxytocin | 153 (86.0%) | 25 (14.0%) | 178 (100.0%) | 0.000 |
| Misoprostol | 110 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 110 (100.0%) | ||
Maternal peripartum complications in relation to the outcome of labor induction
| Variables | Successful induction | Failed induction | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precipitated labor | Yes | 7 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (100%) | 0.642 |
| No | 256 (91.1%) | 25 (8.9%) | 281 (100%) | ||
| Placental abruption | Yes | 1 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (100%) | 1.000 |
| No | 262 (91.3%) | 25 (8.7%) | 287 (100%) | ||
| Uterine rupture | Yes | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (100%) | 1 (100%) | 0.087 |
| No | 263 (91.6%) | 24 (8.4%) | 287 (100%) | ||
| PPH | Yes | 14 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 14 (100%) | 0.383 |
| No | 249 (90.9%) | 25 (9.1%) | 274 (100%) | ||
| Maternal death | Yes | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (100%) | 1.000 |
| No | 262 (91.3%) | 25 (8.7%) | 287 (100%) | ||
| Outcome | Male | 142 (92.2%) | 12 (7.8%) | 154 (100%) | 0.672 |
| Female | 121 (90.3%) | 13 (9.7%) | 134 (100%) | ||
| Birth weight | < 2.5 | 40 (93.0%) | 3 (7.0%) | 43 (100%) | |
| 2.5–3.4 | 135 (90.6%) | 14 (9.4%) | 149 (100%) | 0.883 | |
| ≥3.5 | 88 (91.7%) | 8 (8.3%) | 149 (100%) | ||
| 5th Minutes APGAR score | > 7 | 216 (91.1%) | 21 (8.9%) | 237 (100%) | 1.000 |
| < 7 | 16 (88.9%) | 2 (11.1%) | |||
peripartum fetal complications in relation to the outcome of labor induction
| Variables | Successful induction | Failed induction | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRFHRP | Yes | 18 (90.0%) | 2 (10%) | 20 (100%) | 1.000 |
| No | 245 (91.4%) | 23 (8.6%) | 268 (100%) | ||
| IUFD | Yes | 2 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100%) | 1.000 |
| No | 261 (91.3%) | 25 (8.7%) | 286 (100%) | ||
| Low APGAR score ( | Yes | 13 (92.9%) | 1 (7.1%) | 14 (100%) | 1.000 |
| No | 219 (90.9%) | 22 (9.1%) | 241 (100%) | ||
| Admission to NICU | Yes | 214 (91.1%) | 21 (8.9%) | 235 (100%) | 1.00 |
| No | 18 (90.0%) | 2 (10.0%) | 20 (100%) | ||
predictors of successful induction of labor
| Variables | COR(95% CI) | AOR(95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parity | Primipara | 1.958(.603,6.358) | |
| Multipara | 3.550 (1.374,9.172)* | ||
| Bishop’s score after ripening | Favorable | 27.333 (4.538,164.652)* | 8.150 (1.265, 52.526)* |
| Unfavorable | |||
| Method of induction | Oxytocin | 0.000 (0.000, 0.009)* | 0.000 (0.000, −-) |
| Misoprostol | |||
NB: * = significance at P value < 0.05