Raquel Garcia-Simon1, Antonio Montañes2, Jesús Clemente2, María D Del Pino3, Manuel A Romero4, Ernesto Fabre4, Daniel Oros4. 1. Obstetrics Department, Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain. Electronic address: raquelgasi@gmail.com. 2. Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zaragoza, Spain. 3. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain; Unidad de Codificación e Información, ClínicaCoding and Clinical Information Unit, Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain. 4. Obstetrics Department, Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess health service costs associated with labor induction according to different clinical situations in a tertiary-level hospital. METHODS: In a prospective study, individual patient cost data were assessed for women admitted for induction of labor at a tertiary hospital in Spain between November 1, 2012, and August 31, 2013. The costs of labor induction were estimated according to maternal and neonatal outcomes, method of delivery, cervical condition at admission, and obstetric indication. Direct costs including professional fees, epidural, maternal stay, consumables, and drugs were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 412 women were included in the final cost analysis. The mean total cost of labor induction was €3589.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3475.13-3704.61). Cesarean delivery after labor induction (€4830.45, 95% CI 4623.13-5037.58) was significantly more expensive than spontaneous delivery (€3037.45, 95% CI 2966.91-3179.99) and instrumental vaginal delivery (€3344.31, 95%CI 3151.69-3536.93). The total cost for patients with a very unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <2; €4283.47, 95% CI 4063.06-4503.88) was almost double that for women with a favorable cervix (€2605.09, 95% CI 2327.38-2837.58). Labor induction for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was the most expensive obstetric indication for induction of labor (€4347.32, 95% CI 3890.45-4804.18). CONCLUSION: Following the induction of labor, a number of patient- and treatment-related factors influence costs associated with delivery.
OBJECTIVE: To assess health service costs associated with labor induction according to different clinical situations in a tertiary-level hospital. METHODS: In a prospective study, individual patient cost data were assessed for women admitted for induction of labor at a tertiary hospital in Spain between November 1, 2012, and August 31, 2013. The costs of labor induction were estimated according to maternal and neonatal outcomes, method of delivery, cervical condition at admission, and obstetric indication. Direct costs including professional fees, epidural, maternal stay, consumables, and drugs were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 412 women were included in the final cost analysis. The mean total cost of labor induction was €3589.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3475.13-3704.61). Cesarean delivery after labor induction (€4830.45, 95% CI 4623.13-5037.58) was significantly more expensive than spontaneous delivery (€3037.45, 95% CI 2966.91-3179.99) and instrumental vaginal delivery (€3344.31, 95%CI 3151.69-3536.93). The total cost for patients with a very unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <2; €4283.47, 95% CI 4063.06-4503.88) was almost double that for women with a favorable cervix (€2605.09, 95% CI 2327.38-2837.58). Labor induction for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was the most expensive obstetric indication for induction of labor (€4347.32, 95% CI 3890.45-4804.18). CONCLUSION: Following the induction of labor, a number of patient- and treatment-related factors influence costs associated with delivery.