Jun-Zhu Chen1,2,3, Chang-Lin Zhao1,2,3. 1. Key Laboratory for Forest Resources Conservation and Utilization in the Southwest Mountains of China, Ministry of Education, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China. 2. College of Biodiversity Conservation, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China. 3. Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control of Yunnan Province, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China.
Abstract
Four new wood-inhabiting fungal species, Lyomyces bambusinus, L. cremeus, L. macrosporus and L. wuliangshanensis, are proposed based on a combination of morphological and molecular evidence. Lyomyces bambusinus is characterized by resupinate basidiomata with colliculose to tuberculate hymenial surface and broadly ellipsoid, hyaline, slightly thick-walled, smooth basidiospores. Lyomyces cremeus is characterised by resupinate basidiomata with smooth, cream hymenial surface and ellipsoid, hyaline, thin-walled to slightly thick-walled basidiospores. Lyomyces macrosporus is characterized by pruinose basidiomata with reticulate hymenial surface, presence of three kinds of cystidia and larger basidiospores (6.7-8.9 × 4.4-5.4 µm). Lyomyces wuliangshanensis is characterized by coriaceous basidiomata and ellipsoid, hyaline, slightly thick-walled, smooth basidiospores. The phylogenetic analyses based on molecular data of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region sequences revealed that the four new species belonged to Lyomyces. Lyomyces bambusinus grouped with L. sambuci. Lyomyces cremeus clade was sister to a clade comprised of L. microfasciculatus. Lyomyces macrosporus was sister to L. allantosporus. Lyomyces wuliangshanensis was closely related to L. mascarensis. Jun-Zhu Chen, Chang-Lin Zhao.
Four new wood-inhabiting fungal species, Lyomyces bambusinus, L. cremeus, L. macrosporus and L. wuliangshanensis, are proposed based on a combination of morphological and molecular evidence. Lyomyces bambusinus is characterized by resupinate basidiomata with colliculose to tuberculate hymenial surface and broadly ellipsoid, hyaline, slightly thick-walled, smooth basidiospores. Lyomyces cremeus is characterised by resupinate basidiomata with smooth, cream hymenial surface and ellipsoid, hyaline, thin-walled to slightly thick-walled basidiospores. Lyomyces macrosporus is characterized by pruinose basidiomata with reticulate hymenial surface, presence of three kinds of cystidia and larger basidiospores (6.7-8.9 × 4.4-5.4 µm). Lyomyces wuliangshanensis is characterized by coriaceous basidiomata and ellipsoid, hyaline, slightly thick-walled, smooth basidiospores. The phylogenetic analyses based on molecular data of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region sequences revealed that the four new species belonged to Lyomyces. Lyomyces bambusinus grouped with L. sambuci. Lyomyces cremeus clade was sister to a clade comprised of L. microfasciculatus. Lyomyces macrosporus was sister to L. allantosporus. Lyomyces wuliangshanensis was closely related to L. mascarensis. Jun-Zhu Chen, Chang-Lin Zhao.
P. Karst. typified by (Pers.) P. Karst., is a small corticioid genus characterized by resupinate to effused basidiomata with smooth to granular or odontioid hymenophore, a monomitic hyphal system bearing clamp connections, strongly encrusted generative hyphae, the presence of several types of cystidia; clavate to suburniform basidia, and smooth, thin- to slightly thick-walled, cyanophilous basidiospores (Karsten 1881; Bernicchia and Gorjón 2010). The members of grow on dead, still-attached or fallen branches of angiosperms, on dead wooden and herbaceous stems, or occasionally on gymnosperm wood (Yurchenko et al. 2017). Twenty-three species are currently known in worldwide (Rabenhorst 1851; Karsten 1881, 1882; Peck 1903; Bourdot and Galzin 1911; Cunningham 1959, 1963; Wu 1990; Hjortstam and Ryvarden 2009; Yurchenko et al. 2013, 2017; Gafforov et al. 2017; Riebesehl and Langer 2017) and five species were recorded in China (Xiong et al. 2009; Gafforov et al. 2017; Riebesehl and Langer 2017).Molecular studies on and related genera have been carried out recently (Riebesehl and Langer 2017; Yurchenko et al. 2017; Viner et al. 2018; Riebesehl et al. 2019). Riebesehl and Langer (2017) indicated that s.l. should be divided into several genera: (Parmasto) Hjortstam & Ryvarden, J. Erikss, (Pers.) Gray, Jülich, and (Pers.) Gray and thus 35 new combinations were proposed, including fourteen species. The clarification of complex was conducted based on ITS and 28S sequences analyses and four new species of were described (Yurchenko et al. 2017). Viner et al. (2018) studied the taxonomy of and , and showed that twelve species clustered into clade and then grouped with clade. Phylogenetic and morphological studies on showed that was distinct from , , and and the generic species was sister to (Pers.) P. Karst. formed a single lineage with a high support (Riebesehl et al. 2019).During investigations on wood-inhabiting fungi in southern China, four additional taxa were found, which could not be assigned to any described species in . In this study, the authors expand samplings from previous studies (Gafforov et al. 2017; Riebesehl and Langer 2017) to examine taxonomy and phylogeny of them within , based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions sequences.
Materials and methods
Morphological studies
The specimens studied have been deposited in the herbarium of Southwest Forestry University (SWFC), Kunming, Yunnan Province, P.R. China. Special color terms follow Petersen (1996). Macromorphological descriptions are based on field notes. Micromorphological data were obtained from the dried specimens and observed under a light microscope following Dai (2010) and Cui et al. (2019). The following abbreviations are used: KOH = 5% potassium hydroxide; CB = cotton blue; CB+ = cyanophilous; IKI = Melzer’s reagent; IKI– = non-amyloid and non-dextrinoid; L = mean spore length (arithmetic average of all spores); W = mean spore width (arithmetic average of all spores); Q = L/W ratio; n (a/b) = number of spores (a) measured from given number (b) of specimens.
DNA extraction and sequencing
CTAB rapid plant genome extraction kit-DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd, Beijing) was used to obtain genomic DNA from dried specimens, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Han et al. 2016; Song and Cui 2017) . The ITS region was amplified with the primer pair ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). The PCR cycling procedure for ITS was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 58 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min followed Shen et al. (2019). The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced at Kunming Tsingke Biological Technology Limited Company, Yunnan Province, P.R.China. All newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).
Table 1.
List of species, specimens and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study.
Species name
Sample no.
GenBank accession no.
References
ITS
Lyomycesallantosporus
KAS-GEL 4933
KY800401
Yurchenko et al. 2017
FR 0249548
KY800397
Yurchenko et al. 2017
Lyomycesbambusinus
CLZhao 3675
MN945969
Present study
CLZhao 4808
MN945970
Present study
CLZhao 4831
MN945968
Present study
CLZhao 4840
MN945971
Present study
Lyomycescremeus
CLZhao 2812
MN945973
Present study
CLZhao 4138
MN945974
Present study
CLZhao 8295
MN945972
Present study
Lyomycescrustosus
YG-G 39
MF382993
Gafforov et al. 2017
UC 2022841
KP814310
Rosenthal et al. 2017
Lyomyceserastii
MA-Fungi 34336
JX857800
Gafforov et al. 2017
YG 022
MF382992
Gafforov et al. 2017
Lyomycesgriseliniae
KHL 12971
DQ873651
Larsson et al. 2006
Lyomycesjuniperi
KAS-GEL 4940
DQ340316
Yurchenko et al. 2017
FR 0261086
KY081799
Riebesehl and Langer 2017
Lyomycesmacrosporus
CLZhao 4516
MN945977
Present study
CLZhao 4531
MN945978
Present study
CLZhao 8605
MN945975
Present study
CLZhao 3951
MN945976
Present study
Lyomycesmascarensis
KAS-GEL 4833
KY800399
Yurchenko et al. 2017
KAS-GEL 4908
KY800400
Yurchenko et al. 2017
Lyomycesmicrofasciculatus
CLZhao 4626
MK343568
Present study
CLZhao 5109
MN954311
Present study
TNM F 24757
JN129976
Yurchenko and Wu 2014
Lyomycesorganensis
MSK 7247
KY800403
Yurchenko et al. 2017
Lyomycesorientalis
KAS-GEL 3376
DQ340325
Yurchenko et al. 2017
KAS-GEL 3400
DQ340326
Yurchenko et al. 2017
Lyomycespruni
Ryberg 021018
DQ873624
Larsson et al. 2006
Lyomycessambuci
80 SAMHYP
JX857721
Yurchenko et al. 2017
83 SAMHYP
JX857720
Yurchenko et al. 2017
Lyomycesvietnamensis
TNM F 9073
JX175044
Yurchenko and Wu 2014
Lyomyceswuliangshanensis
CLZhao 4108
MN945980
Present study
CLZhao 4144
MN945981
Present study
CLZhao 4167
MN945979
Present study
CLZhao 4206
MN945982
Present study
CLZhao 4475
MN945983
Present study
Paliferverecundus
KHL 12261
DQ873642
Larsson et al. 2006
Xylodonasperus
UC 2023169
KP814365
Yurchenko et al. 2017
List of species, specimens and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study.
Phylogenetic analyses
Sequencher 4.6 (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was used to assemble and edit the DNA sequence. Sequences were aligned in MAFFT 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) using the “G-INS-I” strategy and manually adjusted in BioEdit (Hall 1999). The sequence alignment was deposited in TreeBase (submission ID 25382). Sequences of (G. Cunn.) Stalpers & P.K. Buchanan and (Fr.) Hjortstam & Ryvarden obtained from GenBank were used as outgroups to root trees following Yurchenko et al. (2017) in Fig. 1.
Figure 1.
Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of four new species and related species in based on ITS sequences. Branches are labelled with maximum likelihood bootstrap equal to or higher than 70%, parsimony bootstrap proportions equal to or higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities equal to or high than 0.95 respectively.
Maximum parsimony (MP), Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses were applied to the ITS dataset sequences. Approaches to phylogenetic analyses followed Wu et al. (2018) and Zhu et al. (2019) the tree construction procedure was performed in PAUP* version 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002). All characters were equally weighted and gaps were treated as missing data. Trees were inferred using the heuristic search option with TBR branch swapping and 1000 random sequence additions. Max-trees were set to 5000, branches of zero length were collapsed and all most-parsimonious trees were saved. Clade robustness was assessed using bootstrap (BT) analysis with 1000 replicates (Felsenstein 1985). Descriptive tree statistics tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index (RI), rescaled consistency index (RC) and homoplasy index (HI) were calculated for each most-parsimonious tree generated.Sequences were also analyzed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) ML analysis was conducted with RAxML-HPC2 through the Cipres Science Gateway (www.phylo.org; Miller et al. 2009). Branch support (BS) for ML analysis was determined by 1000 bootstrap replicates and evaluated under the gamma model.MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander 2004) was used to determine the best-fit evolution model for the data set for Bayesian Inference (BI). Bayesian Inference was performed with MrBayes 3.1.2 with a general time reversible (GTR) model of DNA substitution and a gamma distribution rate variation across sites (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). Four Markov chains were used in each of 2 runs from random starting trees for 600,000 generations, with trees and parameters sampled every 100 generations. The first quarter of generations were discarded as burn-in. A majority rule consensus tree of all remaining trees and posterior probabilities was calculated. Branches that received bootstrap support for maximum likelihood (BS) ≥75%, maximum parsimony (BP) ≥75%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) ≥0.95 were considered significantly supported.
Phylogeny results
The ITS dataset (Fig. 1) included sequences from 39 fungal specimens representing 18 species. The dataset had an aligned length of 608 characters, of which 277 characters were constant and 242 parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded 8 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 978, CI = 0.523, HI = 0.478, RI = 0.738, RC = 0.385). The best-fit model for ITS alignment estimated and applied in the BI was GTR+I+G. At the end of the BI runs, the average standard deviation of split frequencies was 0.008676. The tree topology obtained by BI and ML was similar to the MP one.The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) demonstrated that all samples grouped into the in the present study. grouped with . formed a monophyletic lineage and then grouped with (Yurchenko & Sheng H. Wu) Riebesehl & Langer. was sister to Riebesehl, Yurchenko & Langer. was closely related to Riebesehl, Yurchenko & Langer.Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of four new species and related species in based on ITS sequences. Branches are labelled with maximum likelihood bootstrap equal to or higher than 70%, parsimony bootstrap proportions equal to or higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities equal to or high than 0.95 respectively.
Basidiomata of (holotype). Scale bars: 1 cm (A); 5 mm (B).
Figure 6.
Microscopic structures of (drawn from the holotype) A basidiospores B basidia and basidioles C cystidia D cystidioles E a cross section of basidiomata. Scale bars: 5 μm (A); 10 μm (B–E).
Holotype.
China. Yunnan Province: Puer, Zhenyuan County, Heping Town, Ailaoshan National Nature Reserve, on dead bamboo, 11 January 2018, CLZhao 4831 (SWFC).
Etymology.
The epithet bambusinus (Lat.): refers to the occurrence on bamboo.
Basidiomata.
Annual, resupinate, ceraceous when fresh, becoming brittle and cracking upon drying, up to 20 cm long and 8 cm wide, 100–200 µm thick. Hymenial surface colliculose to tuberculate, white to cream when fresh, turning cream to buff upon drying. Margin narrow, concolorous with hymenial surface.
Hyphal system.
Monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thick-walled, branched, 2.5–3.9 µm in diameter, IKI–, cyanophilous; tissues unchanged in KOH. Numerous crystals present among hyphae.
Hymenium.
Two kinds of cystidia: 1) capitate, hyaline, thin-walled, 35–55 × 4–7 µm, smooth or slightly encrusted; 2) tapering, hyaline, thin-walled, 40–65 × 4–5.5 µm, smooth or slightly encrusted; cystidioles present, hyaline, thin-walled, 12–17 × 2–3 µm. Basidia clavate, constricted, thin-walled, with four sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 16.5–35 × 3.5–7 µm.
China. Yunnan Province: Puer, Jingdong County, Wuliangshan National Nature Reserve, on dead bamboo, 3 October 2017, CLZhao 3675; Zhenyuan County, Heping Town, Ailaoshan National Nature Reserve, on dead bamboo, 11 January 2018, CLZhao 4808, CLZhao 4840 (SWFC).Basidiomata of (holotype). Scale bars: 1 cm (A); 5 mm (B).C.L. Zhao
sp. nov.C9612282-0541-5753-91E4-857E11CA0545834037Figs 3
, 7
Figure 3.
Basidiomata of (holotype). Scale bars: 1 cm (A); 5 mm (B).
Figure 7.
Microscopic structures of (drawn from the holotype) A basidiospores B basidia and basidioles C cystidia D cystidioles E a cross section of basidiomata. Scale bars: 5 μm (A); 10 μm (B–E).
China. Yunnan Province: Jingdong County, Taizhong Town, Ailaoshan Ecological Station, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 23 August 2018, CLZhao 8295 (SWFC).The epithet cremeus (Lat.): refers to the cream hymenial surface.Annual, resupinate, ceraceous when fresh, becoming membranaceous upon drying, up to 13 cm long and 5 cm wide, 50–100 µm thick. Hymenial surface smooth, pale cream when fresh, turn cream upon drying. Margin narrow, white to cream.Monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thick-walled, branched, 3–5 µm in diameter, IKI–, cyanophilous; tissues unchanged in KOH. Numerous crystals present among hyphae.Two kinds of cystidia: 1) capitate, hyaline, thin-walled, 20–40 × 3–5 µm, smooth or slightly encrusted; 2) tapering, hyaline, thin-walled, 18–35 × 3–4.5 µm, smooth or slightly encrusted; cystidioles present, hyaline, thin-walled, 15–20 × 2.5–4 µm. Basidia clavate, with four sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 9–18.5 × 3–6 µm.Basidiospores ellipsoid, hyaline, thin-walled to slightly thick-walled, smooth, IKI–, cyanophilous, guttulate, 4.5–5.6(–5.8) × 3.3–4.3(–4.5) µm, L = 5.01 µm, W = 3.94 µm, Q = 1.25–1.3 (n = 90/3).Lignicolous, causing a white rot. China.China. Yunnan Province: Yuxi, Xinping County, Shimenxia Forestry Park, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 21 August 2017, CLZhao 2812; Puer, Jingdong County, Wuliangshan National Nature Reserve, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 5 October 2017, CLZhao 4138 (SWFC).Basidiomata of (holotype). Scale bars: 1 cm (A); 5 mm (B).C.L. Zhao
sp. nov.BDE71C96-59A9-514A-9643-06C9AC9BF430834038Figs 4
, 8
Figure 4.
Basidiomata of (holotype). Scale bars: 1 cm (A); 5 mm (B).
Figure 8.
Microscopic structures of (drawn from the holotype) A basidiospores B basidia and basidioles C cystidia D cystidioles E a cross section of basidiomata. Scale bars: 10 μm (A–E).
China. Yunnan Province: Puer, Jingdong County, Taizhong Town, Ailaoshan National Nature Reserve, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 24 August 2018, CLZhao 8605 (holotype in SWFC).The epithet macrosporus (Lat.): refers to the larger basidiospores.Annual, resupinate, subceraceous when fresh, becoming pruinose upon drying, up to 22 cm long and 3 cm wide, 100–200 µm thick. Hymenial surface reticulate, cream when fresh, turning cream to buff upon drying. Margin narrow, white to buff.Monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thick-walled, branched, 2.5–4 µm in diameter, IKI–, cyanophilous; tissues unchanged in KOH. Numerous crystals present among hyphae.Three kinds of cystidia: 1) capitate, hyaline, thin-walled, 19–35 × 3–7 µm; 2) tapering, hyaline, thin-walled, 13–20 × 2.5–4 µm; 3) moniliform, hyaline, thin-walled, 15–22 × 4.5–6 µm; fusoid cystidioles present, hyaline, thin-walled, 15–20 × 2.5–4 µm. Basidia subclavate to clavate, constricted, hyaline, thin-walled, with four sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 22.2–38 × 4.5–7 µm.Basidiospores ellipsoid, hyaline, slightly thick-walled, smooth, IKI–, cyanophilous, guttulate, (6.4–)6.7–8.9(–9.1) × 4.4–5.4(–5.7) µm, L = 7.84 µm, W = 4.93 µm, Q = 1.48–1.8 (n = 120/4).Lignicolous, causing a white rot. China.China. Yunnan Province: Puer, Jingdong County, Taizhong Town, Ailaoshan National Nature Reserve, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 4 October 2017, CLZhao 3951; Wuliangshan National Nature Reserve, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 6 October 2017, CLZhao 4516, CLZhao 4531 (SWFC).Basidiomata of (holotype). Scale bars: 1 cm (A); 5 mm (B).C.L. Zhao
sp. nov.0199474D-E47D-572B-B13B-F9D111501B5C834039Figs 5
, 9
Figure 5.
Basidiomata of (holotype). Scale bars: 1 cm (A); 5 mm (B).
Figure 9.
Microscopic structures of (drawn from the holotype) A basidiospores B basidia and basidioles C cystidia D cystidioles E a cross section of basidiomata. Scale bars: 5 μm (A); 10 μm (B–E).
China. Yunnan Province: Puer, Jingdong County, Wuliangshan National Nature Reserve, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 5 October 2017, CLZhao 4167 (SWFC).The epithet wuliangshanensis (Lat.): refers to the locality (Wuliangshan) of the type specimens.Annual, resupinate, subcoriaceous when fresh, becoming coriaceous upon drying, up to 15 cm long and 5 cm wide, 50–150 µm thick. Hymenial surface smooth to more or less tuberculate, white to cream when fresh, turning cream to buff upon drying. Margin narrow, concolorous with hymenial surface.Monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections, hyaline, thick-walled, branched, 2–3 µm in diameter, IKI–, cyanophilous; tissues unchanged in KOH. Numerous crystals present among hyphae.Two kinds of cystidia: 1) capitate, hyaline, thin-walled, 22–37 × 3–6 µm; 2) tapering, hyaline, thin-walled, 21–35 × 4–6.5 µm; fusoid cystidioles present, hyaline, thin-walled, 16–21 × 2.5–3.5 µm. Basidia clavate, hyaline, thin-walled, with four sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 12–20 × 3–4.3 µm.Basidiospores ellipsoid, hyaline, slightly thick-walled, smooth, IKI–, cyanophilous, guttulate, (3.3–)3.5–5.3(–5.5) × 2.8–4(–4.2) µm, L = 4.3 µm, W = 3.56 µm, Q = 1.22–1.31 (n = 120/4).Lignicolous, causing a white rot. China.China. Yunnan Province: Puer, Jingdong County, Wuliangshan National Nature Reserve, on angiosperm trunk, 5 October 2017, CLZhao 4108, CLZhao 4144; on angiosperm stump, 5 October 2017, CLZhao 4206; on fallen branch of angiosperm, 6 October 2017, CLZhao 4475 (SWFC).Basidiomata of (holotype). Scale bars: 1 cm (A); 5 mm (B).Microscopic structures of (drawn from the holotype) A basidiospores B basidia and basidioles C cystidia D cystidioles E a cross section of basidiomata. Scale bars: 5 μm (A); 10 μm (B–E).Microscopic structures of (drawn from the holotype) A basidiospores B basidia and basidioles C cystidia D cystidioles E a cross section of basidiomata. Scale bars: 5 μm (A); 10 μm (B–E).Microscopic structures of (drawn from the holotype) A basidiospores B basidia and basidioles C cystidia D cystidioles E a cross section of basidiomata. Scale bars: 10 μm (A–E).Microscopic structures of (drawn from the holotype) A basidiospores B basidia and basidioles C cystidia D cystidioles E a cross section of basidiomata. Scale bars: 5 μm (A); 10 μm (B–E).
Discussion
Miettinen et al. (2016) analyzed a phylogenetic classification in (, ) and showed that the macromorphology of basidiomata and hymenophore construction did not reflect monophyletic groups. The phylogeny we obtained (Fig. 1) shows that the macromorphological and micromorphological characters are not consistent with monophyletic groups.In our phylogeny, was sisiter to , but morphologically differs from by having ellipsoid to oblong, narrower basidiospores (4.5–6 × 3–3.5 µm, Yurchenko et al. 2017). formed a monophyletic lineage with strong supports (100% BS, 100% BP, 1.00 BPP; Fig. 1) and then was sister to a clade comprised of , , and . However differs in odontioid hymenophore and presence of minute peg-like fascicles of hyphae (Yurchenko and Wu 2014). was sister to , but morphologically differs in having porulose hymenophore and suballantoid to allantoid, narrower basidiospores (7–9 × 3–3.8 µm, Yurchenko et al. 2017). grouped closely with , but differs from by having thin-walled generative hyphae and presence of capitate cystidia (17–38 × 3.5–6 µm, Yurchenko et al. 2017).Five species were reported from China prior to this study, (Sheng H. Wu) Riebesehl & Langer, (H.X. Xiong, Y.C. Dai & Sheng H. Wu) Riebesehl & Langer, , and (Yurchenko & Sheng H. Wu) Riebesehl & Langer. differs from four new species by its odontioid hymenophore (Riebesehl and Langer 2017); by grandinioid hymenophore with arachnoid-farinaceous hymenial surface (Xiong et al. 2009); by minutely odontioid hymenial surface and small emerging fascicles of flexuous hyphae (Yurchenko and Wu 2014); by much thinner basidiomata and non-encrusted, subicular hyphae, shorter cystidia and shorter basidia (Yurchenko et al. 2013).s.l. is an extensively studied group of (Dai 2012; Viner et al. 2018; Riebesehl et al. 2019), but the Chinese species diversity is still not well known, especially in subtropical and tropical areas. The four new species here described are from the subtropics.
Authors: Lisa M Rosenthal; Karl-Henrik Larsson; Sara Branco; Judy A Chung; Sydney I Glassman; Hui-Ling Liao; Kabir G Peay; Dylan P Smith; Jennifer M Talbot; John W Taylor; Else C Vellinga; Rytas Vilgalys; Thomas D Bruns Journal: Mycologia Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 2.696