Objective: We assessed feasibility of an educational program designed to enhance stakeholder knowledge and perceptions of pharmacogenomics at a federally qualified health center (FQHC). Design: FQHCs have a rich history of providing care to the underserved, but often are not represented by studies evaluating cutting-edge concepts. We used a novel educational platform to provide participatory genomic testing and classroom education. We assessed participant knowledge and perceptions using questionnaires between May and July 2018. Setting: We partnered with a FQHC affiliated with an academic medical center in Chicago. Participants: Using convenience sampling, we recruited 20 providers and 10 community members for a feasibility study. Providers included physicians, physician extenders, community health workers, and patient health navigators. Community members were patients, supporters, and/or FQHC advisory board members. Intervention: Participants had the option to undergo personal genomic testing. Online educational modules included basic genetics, cardiovascular pharmacogenomics, and personalized medicine. Education concluded in a 2-hour live course with case-based discussions. Main Outcome Measures: Our main outcome was testing pilot feasibility. Baseline knowledge and perceptions were compared with post-intervention assessments using descriptive statistics, t tests (or Wilcoxon rank-sum) for continuous variables and chi-squared (or Fisher's exact) for categorical variables. Results: We found that attitudes toward the intervention were positive and remained so after intervention. Our intervention was both feasible and acceptable. Genomics knowledge increased for nearly all participants. Conclusions: We have determined that a pharmacogenomics educational program tailored for an underrepresented community is feasible and acceptable. Outcomes will advise methodology for larger implementation studies.
Objective: We assessed feasibility of an educational program designed to enhance stakeholder knowledge and perceptions of pharmacogenomics at a federally qualified health center (FQHC). Design: FQHCs have a rich history of providing care to the underserved, but often are not represented by studies evaluating cutting-edge concepts. We used a novel educational platform to provide participatory genomic testing and classroom education. We assessed participant knowledge and perceptions using questionnaires between May and July 2018. Setting: We partnered with a FQHC affiliated with an academic medical center in Chicago. Participants: Using convenience sampling, we recruited 20 providers and 10 community members for a feasibility study. Providers included physicians, physician extenders, community health workers, and patient health navigators. Community members were patients, supporters, and/or FQHC advisory board members. Intervention: Participants had the option to undergo personal genomic testing. Online educational modules included basic genetics, cardiovascular pharmacogenomics, and personalized medicine. Education concluded in a 2-hour live course with case-based discussions. Main Outcome Measures: Our main outcome was testing pilot feasibility. Baseline knowledge and perceptions were compared with post-intervention assessments using descriptive statistics, t tests (or Wilcoxon rank-sum) for continuous variables and chi-squared (or Fisher's exact) for categorical variables. Results: We found that attitudes toward the intervention were positive and remained so after intervention. Our intervention was both feasible and acceptable. Genomics knowledge increased for nearly all participants. Conclusions: We have determined that a pharmacogenomics educational program tailored for an underrepresented community is feasible and acceptable. Outcomes will advise methodology for larger implementation studies.
Authors: Solomon M Adams; Kacey B Anderson; James C Coons; Randall B Smith; Susan M Meyer; Lisa S Parker; Philip E Empey Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Allison L Cirino; Stephanie Harris; Neal K Lakdawala; Michelle Michels; Iacopo Olivotto; Sharlene M Day; Dominic J Abrams; Philippe Charron; Colleen Caleshu; Christopher Semsarian; Jodie Ingles; Harry Rakowski; Daniel P Judge; Carolyn Y Ho Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Vence L Bonham; Toby Citrin; Stephen M Modell; Tené Hamilton Franklin; Esther W B Bleicher; Leonard M Fleck Journal: J Health Polit Policy Law Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.265
Authors: Mercedes R Carnethon; Jia Pu; George Howard; Michelle A Albert; Cheryl A M Anderson; Alain G Bertoni; Mahasin S Mujahid; Latha Palaniappan; Herman A Taylor; Monte Willis; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 29.690