| Literature DB >> 32260127 |
Zeyneb Chaibeddra1, Salah Akkal2, Houria Ouled-Haddar1, Artur M S Silva3, Ammar Zellagui4, Mohamed Sebti5, Susana M Cardoso3.
Abstract
Scrophularia tenuipes is an Algerian-Tunisian endemic species, which has not been studied yet. Ethyl acetate (EA) and n-butanol (Bu) fractions obtained from Scrophularia tenuipes were investigated for their health benefit properties, in particular with respect to in vivo/in vitro anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities, as well as their potential to inhibit key enzymes with impact in diabetes (α-glucosidase and α-amylase). The fractions had a distinct phytochemical composition, of which EA was richer in total phenolic compounds (225 mg GAE/g) and mostly composed of the phenylethanoid acetyl martynoside. Compared to EA, Bu had higher amounts of total flavonoids, and according to the result obtained from UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn analysis, harpagoside (iridoid) was its major phytochemical. EA fraction was quite promising with regard to the in vivo (at 200 mg/kg, po) anti-inflammatory effect (62% and 52% for carrageenan-induced rat paw edema and xylene-induced ear edema tests, respectively), while Bu fraction exhibited a stronger antioxidant capacity in all tests (IC50 = 68 µg/mL, IC50 = 18 µg/mL, IC50 = 18 µg/mL and A0.50 = 43 µg/mL for DPPH●, ABTS•+, O2•- scavenging assays and cupric-reducing antioxidant capacity method, respectively). Both fractions also showed a strong effect against α-amylase enzyme (IC50 = 8 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL for EA and Bu fraction, respectively).Entities:
Keywords: Scrophularia tenuipes; UHPLC-ESI-DAD-MSn; anti-inflammatory; antidiabetic; antioxidant; iridoids; phenolic; phenylethanoid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32260127 PMCID: PMC7181002 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25071647
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Phenolic compounds of S. tenuipes EA and Bu fractions.
| Peak | Rt (min) | λmax | [M − H]− | ESI MS/MS Product Ions | Probable Compound | EA | Bu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.9 | 294sh, 320 | 179 | 135 | Caffeic acid | d | - |
| 2 | 9.9 | 312 | 309 | 187,118,163 | Coumaroyl- | d | d |
| 3 | 10.5 | 277, 320 | 367 | 349,307,203,161,289,245,191,173 | Feruloylquinic acid | d | - |
| 4 | 10.7 | 272, 334 | 609 | 447, 285,489,429,255 | Kaempferol- | - | 68.0 ± 4.0 |
| 5 | 11.0 | 309 | 163 | 119 | Coumaric acid | 21.4 ± 2.5 | 7.5 ± 0.9 |
| 6 | 12.2 | 282, 334 | 447 | 285,284,327,255; MS3 [285]: 267, 241, 185 | Kampferol- | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 39.3 ± 3.0 |
| 7 | 12.3 | 313 | 509 | 307, 265, 163, 235 | Coumaric ac derivative | d | d |
| 8 | 13.0 | 272, 331 | 447 | 285, 327,255; MS3[285]: 267, 241/239 | Kaempferol- | d | d |
| 9 | 13.6 | 313 | 351 | 333,229,187,273,163,119 | Coumaroyl- | d | d |
| 10 | 13.8 | 313 | 351 | 187, 229, 333, 163, 119 | Coumaroyl- | d | d |
| 11 | 14.9 | 314 | 679 | 637, 499, 351,619, 229, 333, 273 | Coumaroyl- | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.7 |
| 12 | 15.0 | 314 | 679 | 499,351,637,619,333,229,273,517 | Coumaroyl- | 1.5 ±0.2 | 7.7 ± 0.9 |
| 13 | 15.3 | 313 | 351 | 163, 187, 333, 119 | Coumaroyl- | 3.7 ± 0.4 | - |
| 14 | 15.7 | 281 | 493 | 345, 179, 181 | Harpagoside (isom 1) | 7.2 ± 0.6 | 40.4 ± 4.0 |
| 15 | 16.4 | 280 | 493 | 345, 179, 201,147 | Harpagoside (isom 2) | 142.0 ± 15.1 | 316.0 ± 8.0 |
| 16 | 16.9 | 277 | 693 | 651, 633, 505, 517, 475, 457 | Acetyl martynoside | 416.5 ± 17.7 | 90.7 ± 10 |
| TPC (mg GAE/g) | 225.5 ± 0.9 | 181.4 ± 0.5 | |||||
| TF (mg QE/g) | 21.7 ± 3.2 | 64.6 ± 4.8 |
EA, ethyl acetate fraction; Bu, n-butanol fraction; isom, isomer; TPCs, Total phenolic compounds estimated by the Folin–Ciocalteu method and expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g of fraction; TFs, total flavonoids estimated by the aluminum nitrate method and expressed as mg of quercetin equivalents (QEs) per g of fraction; +, detected; - absent.
Figure 1Chromatographic representation of Scrophularia tenuipes fractions at 280 nm. Numbers in the figure correspond to the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn peaks described in Table 1.
Anti-inflammatory activities of S. tenuipes fractions.
| Treatment | Paw-Edema Volume (mL) | Ear-Edema Weight (mg) | BSA Denaturation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | |||
| Control | 2.40 ± 0.01a | 1.68 ± 0.02a | 1.40 ± 0.02a | 4.00 ± 0.03a | - |
| EA | 1.19 ± 0.32b | 0.91 ± 0.09b | 0.52 ± 0.14b | 1.90 ± 0.05b | 80.72 ± 0.75a |
| Bu | 1.96 ± 0.21c | 1.33 ± 0.49c | 1.08 ± 0.54c | 3.00 ± 0.07c | NA |
| Diclofenac | 0.54 ± 0.05d | 0.3 ± 0.01d | 0.25 ± 0.05d | 1.00 ± 0.05d | 94.04 ± 0.49b |
BSA, bovine serum albumin; Bu, n-butanol fraction; EA, ethyl acetate fraction; NA—not active. In vivo studies were performed with 200 mg/kg (fractions) or 10 mg/kg (diclofenac); Anti-denaturation effect of BSA was evaluated with 2 mg/mL (fractions) or 1 mg/mL (diclofenac). Values are means ± SEM. Means followed by different letters (a,b,c,d) in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Tukey’s test or T-test (BSA denaturation).
Antioxidant activities of S. tenuipes fractions.
| ABTS•+ | DPPH• | O2•– | Cupric Reduction (A0.50, µg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EA | 20.3 ± 0.3a | 111.2 ± 1.4a | 18.9 ± 1.2a | 53.4 ± 0.6a |
| Bu | 18.7 ± 0.5b | 69.0 ± 0.2b | 18.5 ± 2.8a | 43.3 ± 1.3b |
| Diclofenac | - | - | - | - |
| BHA | 1.8 ± 0.1c | 5.7 ± 0.4c | - | 3.6 ± 0.2c |
| BHT | 1.3 ± 0.3d | 22.3 ± 1.2d | - | 9.6 ± 0.9d |
| α-tocopherol | - | - | ˂3.1b | - |
| Tanic acid | - | - | ˂3.1b | - |
EA, ethyl acetate fraction; Bu, n-butanol. Values are means of three independent assays ± SD. Means followed by different letters (a,b,c,d) in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Tukey’s test.
Inhibitory activities of S. tenuipes fractions towards α-amylase and α-glucosidase.
| α-Amylase | α-Glucosidase | |
|---|---|---|
| EA | 8.3 ± 0.2a | ≥1000a |
| Bu | 11.0 ± 0.5b | ≥1000a |
| Acarbose | 45.2 ± 1.3c | 275.4 ± 1.6b |
EA, ethyl acetate fraction; Bu, n-butanol fraction; Values are means of three independent assays ± SD. Means followed by different letters (a,b,c) in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Tukey’s test.