Chemical Composition of Scrophularia lucida and the Effects on Tumor Invasiveness in Vitro.

A detannified methanolic extract of Scrophularia lucida L. attenuated the formation of cancer cell-induced circular chemorepellent induced defects (CCIDs) in the lymph endothelial cell barrier, which resemble entry ports for the intravasating tumor into the vasculature as a prerequisite for lymph node metastasis. Therefore, the composition of this extract was studied in an activity-guided approach. Since no data on the secondary metabolites of this plant were available, first phytochemical data were collected in the course of the fractionation of the extract. The study resulted in the identification of 14 substances, among them very rare iridoids, such as scrovalentinoside or koelzioside, and several flavonoids (e.g., nepitrin and homoplantaginin). One of the latter group, 2″-O-acetyl-homoplantaginin, is a new natural compound. In the most active fraction, the flavonoid hispidulin was identified as major component and the assay of the pure compound confirmed a contribution of hispidulin to the CCID-inhibitory effects of S. lucida. The activity of the two major iridoids in this assay was less compared to hispidulin.

Introduction

Species of the genus Scrophularia have been applied for centuries in traditional medicine. The most important one among those, Scrophularia ningpoensis Hemsl., is widely used in traditional Chinese medicine for a broad spectrum of inflammatory diseases (De Santos Galíndez et al., 2002; Tong et al., 2006; Li et al., 2009) and listed in the Chinese Pharmacopeia against febrile diseases with excessive thirst or eruptions, constipation, cough due to exhaustion, conjunctivits, skin disorders, and others (Stöger, 2017). The use in the treatment of inflammatory disorders, wound healing, skin ailments, and health disturbances has been reported for numerous species such as Scrophularia auriculata L. or Scrophularia canina L. from the Mediterranean area (Giner et al., 2000; Guarrera and Lucia, 2007; Passalacqua et al., 2007) as well as for Scrophularia variegata M. Bieb. and Scrophularia striata Boiss. in traditional Iranian medicine (Azadmehr et al., 2013, 2015). A traditional use as an antipyretic and anti-inflammatory agent was described for Scrophularia oldhamii Oliv. and as a diuretic for Scrophularia grossheimii Schischkin (De Santos Galíndez et al., 2002). In Turkish traditional medicine, the species Scrophularia nodosa L. is well-known as a diuretic, to treat hemorrhoids, and also for wound healing, eruptive skin diseases, eczema, psoriasis, and pruritus (Baytop, 1999; Stevenson et al., 2002; Crisan et al., 2009). A use in these indications is also conveyed for the Turkish species Scrophularia depauperata Boiss., Scrophularia cryptophila Boiss. et. Heldr. Boiss., and Scrophularia floribunda Boiss. et. Bal. (Ozbilgin et al., 2014).

Recently, the activity of various extracts from several Scrophularia species has been studied in different cancer models: weak cytotoxic activity of an ethanolic extract from S. striata via induction of apoptosis and G2/M phase arrest was shown in Jurkat human leukemia cells (Azadmehr et al., 2013). In WEHI 164 fibrosarcoma cells, a methanolic extract of this plant exhibited a significant and dose-dependent reduction of the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (Hajiaghaee et al., 2007), which play a role in tissue remodeling and tumor invasion. An apolar fraction from a methanolic extract of Scrophularia orientalis L. significantly reduced the viability of neuroblastoma cells due to a loss of mitochondrial membrane integrity (Lange et al., 2016). In MCF-7 breast cancer cells, weak cytotoxicity of an ethanolic extract from S. variegata was reported (Azadmehr et al., 2015). A dichloromethane extract from Scrophularia oxysepala caused significant cytotoxic and apoptotic effects in MCF-7 cells by influencing the expression of p53, caspase 3, and c-myc, and the cleavage of PARP (Valiyari et al., 2013). The anti-tumor activity of S. oxysepala in breast cancer was confirmed in vivo in an allograft model in mice inoculated with mammary carcinoma 4T1 cells. Animals treated with 50 or 100 mg/kg of an ethanolic extract developed significantly smaller tumors in size and weight (Baradaran et al., 2017). In a study of five Scrophularia species, S. floribunda and Scrophularia lucida L. displayed the highest cytotoxic activity against HL-60 promyeloic leukemia cells. These extracts were also tested in a three-dimensional co-culture cell model consisting of MCF-7 breast cancer spheroids placed on top of telomerase-immortalized human lymph endothelial cell (LEC) monolayers. There, tumor spheroids cause the formation of large cell-free areas in the lymph endothelial barrier, so-called “circular chemorepellent induced defects” (CCIDs), through which tumor cells penetrate the vasculature. This assay mimics intravasation which is an early step within the metastatic cascade resembling the pathological situation in rodents and humans (Madlener et al., 2010; Vonach et al., 2011; Viola et al., 2013). A detannified methanolic extract of S. lucida L. was the most active one in suppressing CCID formation (Giessrigl et al., 2012).

The lack of any information about the chemical composition of S. lucida prompted us to perform an activity-guided search for the active principle of this species contributing to the inhibitory effect in the CCID assay.

Experimental

General Experimental Procedures

Hispidulin was obtained from Sigma–Aldrich. All other flavonoids for dereplication were on stock at the Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna.

For TLC, silica gel plates or HPTLC plates RP-8 (Merck, Germany) and the mobile phases (1) CHCl3–CH3COOHconc.– MeOH–H2O (60:32:12:18), (2) EtOAc–HCOOHconc.–CH3 COOHconc.–H2O (100:11:11:20), (3) EtOAc–MeOH–HCOOHconc.–H2O (75:15:4:4), or (4) MeOH–H2O (90:10) were used.

A Shimadzu LC-20AD pump, an SPD M20A diode array detector, a CTO-20AC column oven, and a SIL 20AC HT auto-sampler (Kyoto, Japan) served for analytical HPLC on a Luna 5 μ C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm) column (Phenomenex, United States) at 25°C and a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Mobile phase 1 consisted of (A) aqueous formic acid (pH 3) and (B) acetonitrile-aqueous formic acid (pH 3; 80+2) and the gradient program 1 was 5% B (0 min), 20% B (15 min), 20% B (25 min), 50% B (65 min), and 95% B (80 min). Mobile phase 2 was (A) aqueous formic acid (pH 3) and (B) acetonitrile and the gradient 2 increased from 5% B (0 min) to 95% B (60 min). UV data were recorded from 190 to 400 nm. All solvents of analytical or HPLC-grade (acetonitrile, Chromanorm; methanol, LiChrosolv) were obtained from VWR International (West Chester, PA, United States) and CH3COOHconc. (Rotichrom) from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany).

NMR spectra were recorded on an Avance III 600 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Germany) using a 5 mm broadband observe probe (BBFO Smart probe) with z-axis gradients and automatic tuning and matching accessory; resonance frequency for 1H NMR: 600.13 MHz, for 13C NMR: 150.90 MHz. The measurements were performed for solutions in fully deuterated DMSO or methanol at 298 K. Standard 1D and 2D experiments like double quantum filtered COSY, TOCSY, NOESY, HSQC, and HMBC were used as supplied by the manufacturer. Chemical shifts were referenced internally to the residual, non-deuterated solvent signal for 1H (δ = 2.50 ppm for DMSO, δ = 3.31 ppm for methanol) or to the carbon signal of the solvent for 13C (δ = 39.52 for DMSO, δ = 49.00 ppm for methanol). The analysis of the 1H NMR multiplett structures was assisted by spin simulations using DAISY within the Topspin Software (Bruker BioSpin).

LC–MS analyses were carried out on an UltiMate 3000 RSLC-series system (Dionex, Germering, Germany) coupled to a 3D quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer via an orthogonal ESI source (HCT, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The HPLC parameters were as described above. The eluate flow was split 1:4 before entering the ESI ion source, which was operated as follows: capillary voltage: +3.5/-3.7 kV, nebulizer: 26 psi (N2), dry gas flow: 9 L/min (N2), and dry temperature: 340°C. Positive and negative ion mode multistage mass spectra up to MS4 were obtained in automated data-dependent acquisition mode using helium as collision gas, an isolation window of Δm/z = 4, and a fragmentation amplitude of 1.0 V. In addition, compounds 13 and 14 were measured on the HCT instrument by direct infusion after addition of ammonium acetate as additive to generate [M+NH4]+ ions. HRESIMS spectra of compound 3 were recorded on a maXis HD ESI-Qq-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) by direct infusion. The sum formulas of the detected ions were determined using Bruker Compass DataAnalysis 4.2 based on the mass accuracy (Δm/z ≤ 2 ppm) and isotopic pattern matching (SmartFormula algorithm).

Plant Material

Aerial parts of S. lucida were collected on April 20th 2012, along the Mediterranean coast east of Dalyan and south of Ortaca (latitude: 36.808838, longitude: 28.735583). The material was authenticated by Dr. Özkan Eren, Department of Biology, Adnan Menderes University, using the serial “Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands” (Davis, 1968–1985). Voucher specimen (Herbarium code: AYDN No.: 2601) in duplicates was deposited in the herbarium of Department of Biology, Adnan Menderes University.

Extraction and Isolation

The freeze-dried and pulverized material of S. lucida (1.8 kg) was extracted with methanol at the ratio of 1:10 at room temperature by maceration on a shaker overnight. The combined solutions were evaporated at 40°C resulting in 158 g crude methanol extract; 140 g of the extract were fractionated in four portions, whereby each portion was dissolved in 300 mL MeOH–H2O (10:1) and partitioned three times with 300 mL petroleum ether, each, to remove chlorophyll, waxes, and fatty matters. The MeOH–H2O phase was then diluted with 300 mL H2O and partitioned with three times 600 mL chloroform. After washing the organic layer with 1% aqueous NaCl solution and evaporation, 15.6 g chloroform fraction (CF) was obtained. From the remaining MeOH–H2O fraction, MeOH was removed and the aqueous residue partitioned with three times 280 mL ethyl acetate, resulting in 12.3 g ethyl acetate fraction (EF) and 110.2 g aqueous fraction (AF) after evaporation.

Ten grams of EF were separated by column chromatography (CC; 3 cm × 60 cm) on Sephadex LH-20 under elution with 50% MeOH yielding 15 combined fractions (a–o). In fractions k and l, compound 1 was identified by TLC and LC-DAD. Fractions e (1 g) and g (580 mg) were further fractionated on the same stationary phase under elution with 30% MeOH, resulting in fractions e1–e22 and g1–g19. From fraction e18, 46.5 mg of compound 2 precipitated. Solid phase extraction (Megabond Elut C18 cartridge; 12 mL; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, United States; sequential elution with 20, 30, 40, and 50% MeOH) of fraction e22 resulted in the isolation of compound 3 (7 mg) and the identification of compound 4. A major component from fraction g6 (63.2 mg) was finally purified by another CC on Sephadex LH-20 under elution with H2O to yield 27 mg compound 5. In fraction g10, compounds 6 and 7 were identified, and in fraction g19, compound 8 was confirmed.

A portion of CF (3.9 g) was submitted to CC on silica and elution with CHCl3–MeOH–H2O (75:15:1.5), resulting in 25 fractions, five of which (A–E) were further investigated. In fraction A (62.5 mg), compound 9 was identified as the major component. In fraction B (150.8 mg), three major compounds (10–12) besides 8 were detected and tentatively identified by LC–MS. From fraction C (150.9 mg), compound 13 (144.7 mg) and from fraction D (630.5 mg), compound 14 (532 mg) were obtained. Fraction E (125.9 mg) contained a complex mixture of easy decomposable substances and attempts to isolate those by CC were not successful.

Astragalin (1): Rf in TLC: system 1 = 0.50; system 2 = 0.74.

Homoplantaginin (2): yellowish amorphous powder;1H-NMR and 13C-NMR data: see Table ; +ESIMS m/z 463.1 [M+H]+; +ESIMS2 (463.1→) m/z 301.3 (100); +ESIMS3 (463.1 → 301.3 →) m/z 286.3 (100); +ESIMS4 (463.1 → 301.3 → 286.3 →) m/z 240.1 (10), 186.2 (28), 168.3 (100), 167.1 (11), 121.5 (25), and 120.5 (14); -ESIMS m/z 461.0 [M-H]-; -ESIMS2 (461.0 →) m/z 446.2 (45), 299.2 (100), 298.2 (17), 297.2 (16), 285.2 (20), 284.2 (73), and 283.2 (57); -ESIMS3 (461.0 → 299.2 →) m/z 284.2 (100); and -ESIMS3 (461.0 → 284.2 →) m/z 255.2 (100), 239.1 (10), 227.1 (51), 211.1 (21), 183.1 (11), and 137.2 (11).

2″-: yellowish amorphous powder;1H-NMR and 13C-NMR data: see Table ; +ESIMS m/z 505.0 [M+H]+; +ESIMS2 (505.0 →) m/z 301.3 (100); +ESIMS3 (505.0 → 301.3 →) m/z 286.3 (100); +ESIMS4 (505.0 → 301.3 → 286.3 →) m/z 186.1 (18), 168.3 (100), 140.2 (20), and 121.4 (11); -ESIMS m/z 503.0 [M-H]-; -ESIMS2 (503.0 →) m/z 488.2 (9), 443.2 (10), 299.2 (100), 298.3 (20), 297.3 (20), 284.2 (45), and 283.2 (36); -ESIMS3 (503.0 → 299.2) m/z 284.2 (100); and -ESIMS4 (503.0 → 299.2 → 284.2 →) m/z 256.1 (59), 255.1 (100), 239.1 (24), 229.0 (28), 228.1 (20), 227.1 (23), 216.0 (27), 211.2 (23), 200.2 (24), 199.2 (38), 183.0 (12), 166.1 (17), 163.1 (13), 150.2 (13), and 141.2 (13). +HRESIMS m/z 505.1340 [M+H]+ (calcd for C24H25O12+, m/z 505.1341, Δ = 0.2 ppm), 527.1159 [M+Na]+ (calcd for C24H24O12Na+, m/z 527.1160, Δ = 0.2 ppm).

Nepitrin (4): Rf in TLC: system 2 = 0.63. LC-DAD data: see Supplementary Material.

Verbascoside (5): whitish amorphous powder; LC-DAD-data: see Supplementary Material; +ESIMS m/z 642.2 [M+NH4]+, 625.1 [M+H]+; +ESIMS2 (642.2 →) m/z 479.1 (18), 471.1 (74), and 325.0 (100); +ESIMS3 (642.2 → 471.1 →) m/z 453.2 (11), 325.0 (100), 309.0 (11), and 162.9 (54); +ESIMS3 (642.2 → 325.0 →) m/z 162.9 (100); +ESIMS4 (642.2 → 325.0 → 162.9 →) m/z 162.9 (16), 144.9 (100), and 134.9 (23); -ESIMS m/z 623.2 [M-H]-; -ESIMS2 (623.2 →) m/z 461.1 (100); and -ESIMS3 (623.2 → 461.1 →) m/z 315.0 (43), 160.8 (12), and 134.9 (100).

Kaempferol-3-: Rf in TLC: system 2 = 0.55. LC-DAD data: see Supplementary Material.

Rutin (7): Rf in TLC: system 2 = 0.48. LC-DAD data: see Supplementary Material.

Luteolin-7-: Rf in TLC: system 2 = 0.71. LC-DAD data: see Supplementary Material.

Hispidulin (9): yellowish amorphous powder; LC-DAD data: see Supplementary Material; +ESIMS m/z 301.1 [M+H]+; +ESIMS2 (301.1 →) m/z 286.0 (100); +ESIMS3 (301.1 → 286.0 →) m/z 256.8 (16), 185.9 (17), 167.9 (100), 140.0 (14), 122.0 (38), 120.9 (30), 119.0 (24), and 112.0 (23); -ESIMS m/z 299.0 [M-H]-; -ESIMS2 (299.0 →) m/z 283.9 (100); and -ESIMS3 (299.0 → 283.9 →) m/z 266.8 (17), 255.8 (56), 254.9 (29), 238.8 (22), 227.7 (64), 226.8 (74), 213.8 (43), 211.8 (55), 210.8 (18), 199.8 (77), 198.9 (10), 198.0 (10), 185.7 (32), 183.7 (28), 182.9 (17), 177.7 (11), 163.8 (24), 149.7 (21), 136.8 (100), and 129.8 (11).

Buergeriside C1 isomer (10): +ESIMS m/z 307.1 [M-H2O+H]+, 347.1 [M+Na]+; +ESIMS2 (307.1 →) m/z 160.9 (100); +ESIMS3 (307.1 → 160.9 →) m/z 132.9 (100); -ESIMS m/z 359.2 [M+Cl]-, 369.1 [M+HCOO]-; and -ESIMS2 (369.1 →) m/z 323.0 (48), 262.9 (26), 218.8 (34), 190.8 (12), 176.8 (100), and 144.9 (27).

Buergeriside C1 isomer (11):+ESIMS m/z 307.1 [M-H2O+H]+, 347.1 [M+Na]+; +ESIMS2 (307.1 →) m/z 161.0 (100); +ESIMS3 (307.1 → 161.0 →) m/z 133.0 (100); -ESIMS m/z 359.3 [M+Cl]-, 369.1 [M+HCOO]-; and -ESIMS2 (369.1 →) m/z 323.9 (22), 323.0 (74), 236.8 (12), 219.7 (15), 218.8 (28), 190.8 (36), 176.9 (43), 145.9 (11), 144.8 (100), and 126.9 (7).

6-O-(2″-Acetyl-3″,4″-: +ESIMS m/z 833.3 [M+Na]+; +ESIMS2 (833.3 →) m/z 803.2 (11), 773.2 (35), 751.3 (100), 495.1 (30); -ESIMS m/z 845.5 [M+Cl]-, 855.3 [M+HCOO]-; -ESIMS2 (855.3 →) m/z 810.2 (65), 809.3 (100), and 533.2 (14); and -ESIMS3 (855.3 → 809.3 →) m/z 767.2 (36), 750.2 (28), 749.2 (37), 662.1 (39), 661.2 (100), 648.1 (41), 647.2 (36), 629.2 (11), 620.2 (16), 619.2 (21), 618.3 (12), 617.0 (17), 533.1 (16), 353.0 (11), 311.0 (18), and 293.0 (11).

Koelzioside (13): whitish amorphous powder;1H-NMR and 13C-NMR shifts: see Supplementary Material; +ESIMS m/z 828.4 [M+NH4]+; +ESIMS2 (828.4 →) m/z 449.1 (100); +ESIMS3 (828.4 → 449.1 →) m/z 389.0 (11), 301.0 (47), 241.0 (25), and 131.0 (100); and -ESIMS m/z 845.3 [M+Cl]-, 855.3 [M+HCOO]-.

Scrovalentinoside (14): whitish amorphous powder;1H-NMR and 13C-NMR shifts: see Supplementary Material; +ESIMS m/z 770.3 [M+NH4]+; +ESIMS2 (770.3 →) m/z 770.3 (14), 591.2 (5), 573.1 (4), and 391.1 (100); +ESIMS3 (770.3 → 391.1 →) m/z 391.1 (28), 271.1 (6), 213.0 (21), 161.0 (100), 153.0 (71), 133.0 (7), and 111.1 (19); and -ESIMS m/z 787.3 [M+Cl]-, 797.3 [M+HCOO]-.

Cell Culture

Cultivation of human MCF-7 breast cancer cells was carried out in MEM medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% NEAA (all from Invitrogen Life Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany) and of telomerase immortalized human LECs in EGM2 MV medium (Clonetics CC-4147, Allendale, NJ, United States) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

3-D Co-cultivation of MCF-7 Cancer Cells With LECs

MCF-7 cells were transferred to 30 mL MEM medium containing 6 mL of a 1.6% methylcellulose solution (0.3% final concentration; cat. no. M-512, 4000 centipoises; Sigma–Aldrich, Munich, Germany). To each well of a 96-well plate (Greiner Bio-one, Cellstar 650185, Kremsmünster, Austria), 150 μL of the cell suspension was transferred for spheroid formation within 48 h. Then, MCF-7 spheroids were washed in PBS and transferred to CellTrackerTM green (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany) stained LEC monolayers that had been seeded into 24-well plates (Costar 3524, Sigma) in 2 mL EGM2 MV medium (Vonach et al., 2011).

Circular Chemorepellent-Induced Defect (CCID) Assay

After 4 h of incubation of the co-cultures of MCF-7 spheroids (3,000 cells/spheroid) and the LEC monolayer, the size of CCIDs in the LEC monolayer underneath the MCF-7 spheroids was photographed with an Axiovert (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) fluorescence microscope to visualize CellTrackerTM (green) stained LECs underneath the spheroids (Madlener et al., 2010). CCID areas were calculated with the Axiovision Re. 4.5 software (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). MCF-7 spheroids were treated with solvent (ethanol) as negative control. The CCID areas of at least 15 spheroids per experiment were measured.

Results and Discussion

From the methanolic extract of the aerial parts from S. lucida, apolar compounds were depleted by extraction with petroleum ether. After subsequent partition with chloroform and ethyl acetate, the two organic fractions and the residue of the aqueous phase were tested in the CCID assay. The crude methanol extract significantly and linearly inhibited CCID formation between concentrations of 0.25–1 mg/mL (Figure ). At a concentration of 0.25 mg/mL, the CF seemed to be even more effective than 0.25 mg/mL of the methanol extract; however, this difference was not significant. The EF was only active at 1 mg/mL and the AF was inactive at the tested concentrations. Therefore, the CF was chosen for further separation by CC on silica and five of the resulting sub-fractions (A–E) were active in the CCID assay with sub-fraction A exhibiting the strongest inhibition (Figure ). The EF was separated by size exclusion chromatography followed by solid phase extraction or another subsequent size exclusion chromatography. Due to the lower activity of the EF in the CCID assay, these sub-fractions were submitted to chemical investigations only.

MCF-7 spheroids pre-treated for 30 min with solvent (Co) or indicated concentration of different fractions, placed on top of LEC monolayers, and co-cultivated for 4 h when CCIDs were analyzed. Three independent experiments with at least 15 replicates were analyzed. Error bars indicate means ± SEM and asterisks significance (t-test).

MCF-7 spheroids pre-treated for 30 min with solvent (Co) or indicated concentration of different subfractions, placed on top of LEC monolayers, and co-cultivated for 4 h when CCIDs were analyzed. Three independent experiments with at least 15 replicates were analyzed. Error bars indicate means ± SEM and asterisks significance (t-test).

The processes resulted in the elucidation of 14 compounds, one of which is a new natural product (Figure ). The 13 known compounds were identified by chromatographic, mass spectrometric and/or spectroscopic dereplication with authentic samples or data from literature. This led to the elucidation of seven flavonoids. The widespread natural compounds astragalin (1), luteolin-7-O-glucoside (8), kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside (6), and rutin (7) were confirmed by TLC- and LC-DAD comparison with the authentic substances. To the best of our knowledge, only the two latter have been reported in the genus Scrophularia until now, namely, in Scrophularia ilwensis C. Koch (Calis et al., 1993). Two further, less prevalent flavonoids, nepitrin (4) and homoplantaginin (2), had been isolated from S. ningpoensis (Li et al., 2009) and nepitrin also from S. striata (Monsef-Esfahani et al., 2010) before. 1H-NMR- and 13C-NMR data of 2 correlated excellently with the data published earlier for homoplantaginin (Wang et al., 1998; Dawa et al., 2009). Hispidulin (9) was detected for the first time in a Scrophularia species and elucidated by LC-DAD comparison and LC–MS data.

Structures of compounds 1–14. Glcp, glucopyranosyl; Rhap, rhamnopyranosyl; Ac, acetyl.

A new flavonoid (3) was identified by thorough MS and NMR experiments: a molecular formula of C24H24O12 was determined from the HRESIMS data. Fragmentation of the [M+H]+ ion at m/z 505.0 showed the loss of a 204 Da to yield a Y0 ion at m/z 301.3, which again lost a in MS3, typical for a methoxy group bound to an aromatic system. The MS2, MS3, and MS4 spectra were nearly identical to those of homoplantaginin. Fragmentation of the [M-H]- ion at m/z 503.0 confirmed this information. In addition, the loss of 60 Da (CH3COOH) in MS2 indicated acetylation of the glucose of homoplantaginin. The signals of 3 in the 1H-NMR spectrum excellently correlated with those of compound 2 (Table ), despite a large downfield shift of the proton at C-2″ in the sugar for 1.55 ppm. The signals of the protons at C-1″ and C-3″ were shifted downfield for 0.24 and 0.22 ppm, respectively, as well. Additionally, from the singlet at δ = 2.038 ppm, linkage of an acetyl group was deduced. The connection of an additional acetyl group in position 2″ of homoplantaginin was confirmed by the 13C-NMR data. The signals of C-1″ and C-3″ were shifted upfield for 2.28 and 2.95 ppm, respectively. Signals of an acetyl group occurred at δ = 169.26 ppm (quarternary C) and δ = 20.82 ppm (methyl C). An HMBC crosspeak from the CH3 protons to the C-2″ finally proofed the connectivity. Thus, compound 3 was unambiguously identified as 2″-O-acetyl-homoplantaginin.

The phenylpropanoid verbascoside, which had been detected in many species of the Scrophulariaceae family (see, e.g., Zhang et al., 2013; Pasdaran et al., 2016, 2017; Venditti et al., 2016), was isolated from S. lucida as well and identified by HPLC-DAD and MS.

The genus is well-known for synthesizing a broad range of iridoids (De Santos Galíndez et al., 2002) and two such compounds were isolated from and two further ones tentatively identified in the CF.

The major iridoid was scrovalentinoside (14). The compound was elucidated by MS and NMR experiments (see Supplementary Material). The spectroscopic data were in excellent accordance with those published after isolation of the compound from S. auriculata L. ssp. pseudoauriculata (Senn.) Bolós et Vigo (Giner et al., 1998) and from S. nodosa L. (Miyase and Mimatsu, 1999). A second iridoid was unambiguously elucidated as koelzioside (13) based on MS experiments and the analogy of the 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR data as reported for the compound, until now only known from Scrophularia koelzii L. (Bhandari et al., 1992) and Scrophularia deserti Del. (Ahmed et al., 2003). Tentatively identified by thorough LC–MS experiments were two isomers of buergeriside C1 (10 and 11), known from Scrophularia buergeriana (Miquel) (Kim and Kim, 2000), and 6-O-(2″-acetyl-3″,4″-di-O-trans-cinnamoyl)-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-catalpol (scropolioside B, 12), reported in Scrophularia scopolii [Hoppe ex] Pers. var. scopolii (Calis et al., 1988). Compounds 10 and 11 both showed a UV spectrum typical for a para-substituted cinnamic acid derivative and yielded identical fragment ions, although the relative intensities were different in the MS2 spectra of the [M+COOH]- ion of 10 and 11. Fragmentation of the [M-H2O+H]+ ion yielded the acylium ion of methoxycinnamic acid (Z0), while CID of the [M+COOH]- ion produced deprotonated methoxycinnamic acid (Y0), dehydrated deoxyhexose (B1), and typical cross-ring cleavage of the deoxyhexose. From the compounds described for the genus Scrophularia, this pattern only fits to buergeriside C1, why we have tentatively identified 10 and 11 as buergeriside C1 isomers. The UV spectrum of 12 points toward cinnamic acid. Fragmentation of the [M-H]- ion (resulting from CID of the [M+COOH]- ion) yielded the neutral loss of 60, 148, and 162 Da, fitting to an acetylated, cinnamoylated, and hexosylated compound. Scropolioside B is the only previously described compound in the genus Scrophularia being in accordance with these data. All iridoids detected in S. lucida are very rare natural compounds.

The quantitative determination by HPLC of the major compounds in the methanolic extract revealed 3% homoplantaginin, 1.4% scrovalentinoside, and 0.7% koelzioside.

In an earlier study, 20 μg/mL of the methanolic extract of S. lucida was reported to induce 70% apoptosis and to almost completely inhibit proliferation of HL-60 cells in S-phase within 48 and 72 h, respectively (Giessrigl et al., 2012). Here, we demonstrate that 250 μg/mL of the methanolic extract inhibits 60% CCID formation in the MCF-7/LEC model within 4 h and the CF of the methanolic extract inhibited CCIDs almost similarly (with insignificant difference; Figure ). Sub-fraction A of the CF was the most active one and other four fractions (B–E) also exhibited significant CCID-inhibitory properties (Figure ).

Hispidulin turned out to be the major component in sub-fraction A, whereas koelzioside and scrovalentinoside, the main components in sub-fractions C and D, respectively, showed significantly less activity. To evaluate the potential of hispidulin in suppressing CCID formation, the pure compound was tested as well-demonstrating an IC50 of 88.7 μM confirming a contribution of hispidulin to the effects of the methanolic extract. This further implicated that other components present in sub-fraction A must have synergized strongly with hispidulin as only 250 μg/mL of sub-fraction A inhibited ∼90% CCID formation (compared to 26.6 mg/mL of purified hispidulin, which inhibited just 50%). Conceivably, residual amounts of sub-fraction B still been present in sub-fraction A caused this synergy. Hispidulin, in vitro and in vivo, had been shown to inhibit proliferation and to induce apoptosis of various cancer lines (Yu et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015). The compound exhibited cytotoxicity toward HepG2 liver cancer cells but not normal liver cells (Gao et al., 2014). It also inhibited pancreas cancer cell mobility and invasion in vitro as well as neovascularization in C57/BL6 mice (He et al., 2011). Additionally, colon cancer cell intravasation through blood endothelial barriers was hindered in vitro (Holzner et al., 2017).

Conclusion

In the activity-guided search for components of S. lucida inhibitory in the CCID assay, we showed that intravasation of breast cancer cells through the lymph endothelial wall, which is the major route of breast cancer dissemination, is significantly inhibited by hispidulin and other compounds present in the CF of S. lucida methanolic extract.

In addition, this is the first study characterizing the chemical composition of S. lucida. It resulted in the proof or tentative identification of several rare iridoids and flavonoids for the first time in the genus Scrophularia and a new compound, 2″-O-acetyl-homoplantaginin, was unambiguously elucidated.

For a more profound assessment of the potential of S. lucida to inhibit metastasis in breast cancer, testing in an appropriate animal model is necessary as a next step.

Author Contributions

VL, LS, and TL performed the phytochemical fractionation of the extract and isolation of secondary metabolites. JE performed the CCID assay of hispidulin. HK performed all NMR measurements and structure elucidation. MZ performed all MS and LC–MS measurements and structure elucidation. CN performed the CCID assays of the extracts and fractions. GK supervised all pharmacological experiments. AÖ collected the plant material, was responsible for correct identification, and prepared the extract. LK supervised all phytochemical work. LK, HK, MZ, CN, and GK compiled the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Table 1

1H NMR and 13C NMR data of compounds 2 and 3 in DMSO-d6.

		Compound 2			Compound 3
Position		1H (ppm)	JH.H (Hz)	13C (ppm)	1H (ppm)	JH.H (Hz)	13C (ppm)
2	C	–	–	164.3	–	–	164.4
3	CH	6.86	s	102.7	6.87	s	102.7
4	C	–	–	182.3	–	–	182.3
4a	C	–	–	105.7	–	–	106.1
5	C	–	–	152.5	–	–	152.6
	OH	12.96	s	–	12.97	s	–
6	C	–	–	132.5	–	–	132.5
	CH3	3.77	s	60.3	3.65	s	60.2
7	C	–	–	156.5	–	–	155.9
8	CH	7.02		94.3	7.03	s	94.7
8a	C	–	–	152.1	–	–	152.0
1′	C	–	–	121.0	–	–	120.9
2′/6′	CH	7.95	d 8.8	128.6	7.94	d 8.9	128.6
3′/5′	CH	6.94	d 8.8	116.0	6.94	d 8.9	116.0
4′	C	–	–	161.4	–	–	161.5
1″	CH	5.11	d 7.1	100.2	5.35	d 8.1	97.9
2″	CH	3.34	dd 7.1/9.6	73.2	4.89	dd 8.1/9.6	73.3
	C	–	–		–	–	169.3
	CH3	–	–		2.04	s	20.8
3″	CH	3.32	dd 9.6/9.2	76.7	3.54	dd 9.6/9.1	73.8
4″	CH	3.21	dd 9.2/9.6	69.5	3.31	dd 9.1/9.7	69.6
5″	CH	3.47	ddd 9.6/ 6.0/2.1	77.3	3.58	ddd 9.7/6.0/2.1	77.5
6″a	CH2	3.73	dd 2.1/11.6	60.6	3.77	dd 2.1/11.8	60.4
b		3.49	dd 6.0/11.6		3.53	dd 6.0/11.8
Further OH signals		10.40 5.43 5.12 4.63			10.43 5.39 4.77