Literature DB >> 25324109

Recognition of time-compressed speech does not predict recognition of natural fast-rate speech by older listeners.

Sandra Gordon-Salant1, Danielle J Zion1, Carol Espy-Wilson2.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether recognition of time-compressed speech predicts recognition of natural fast-rate speech, and whether this relationship is influenced by listener age. High and low context sentences were presented to younger and older normal-hearing adults at a normal speech rate, naturally fast speech rate, and fast rate implemented by time compressing the normal-rate sentences. Recognition of time-compressed sentences over-estimated recognition of natural fast sentences for both groups, especially for older listeners. The findings suggest that older listeners are at a much greater disadvantage when listening to natural fast speech than would be predicted by recognition performance for time-compressed speech.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25324109      PMCID: PMC6377055          DOI: 10.1121/1.4895014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Time-Compressed Speech Identification Is Predicted by Auditory Neural Processing, Perceptuomotor Speed, and Executive Functioning in Younger and Older Listeners.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

2.  Does Time Compression Decrease Intelligibility for Female Talkers More Than for Male Talkers?

Authors:  Eric M Johnson; Shae D Morgan; Sarah Hargus Ferguson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Neural Presbyacusis in Humans Inferred from Age-Related Differences in Auditory Nerve Function and Structure.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Jayne B Ahlstrom; James W Dias; Lilyana B Kerouac; Carolyn M McClaskey; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 4.  Improving older adults' understanding of challenging speech: Auditory training, rapid adaptation and perceptual learning.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Gregory Ellis; Kendra Marks; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Functional Age-Related Changes Within the Human Auditory System Studied by Audiometric Examination.

Authors:  Oliver Profant; Milan Jilek; Zbynek Bures; Vaclav Vencovsky; Diana Kucharova; Veronika Svobodova; Jiri Korynta; Josef Syka
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  The Role of Phonological, Auditory Sensory and Cognitive Skills on Word Reading Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Study.

Authors:  Cristina Ferraz Borges Murphy; Eliane Schochat; Doris-Eva Bamiou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-12

8.  Speech Perception in Older Adults: An Interplay of Hearing, Cognition, and Learning?

Authors:  Liat Shechter Shvartzman; Limor Lavie; Karen Banai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-17

9.  The recognition of time-compressed speech as a function of age in listeners with cochlear implants or normal hearing.

Authors:  Anna R Tinnemore; Lauren Montero; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.702

10.  Don't speak too fast! Processing of fast rate speech in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Hélène Guiraud; Nathalie Bedoin; Sonia Krifi-Papoz; Vania Herbillon; Aurélia Caillot-Bascoul; Sibylle Gonzalez-Monge; Véronique Boulenger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.