| Literature DB >> 32258137 |
Nan Jiang1, Yinghua Juan2, Lulu Tian3, Xiaodong Chen1, Wentao Sun2, Lijun Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Freeze-thaw influences soil-dissolved nitrogen (N) pools due to variations in bacterial communities in temperate regions. The availability of soil water is important to soil biogeochemical cycles under frozen conditions. However, it is unclear how soil water content (SWC) mediates the effects of freeze-thaw on soil-dissolved N pools and bacterial communities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32258137 PMCID: PMC7086428 DOI: 10.1155/2020/6867081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Soil N pools (mg N kg−1 dry soil) and the net N mineralization rate (NNMR, mg N kg−1 day−1) for each freeze-thaw (FT) treatment (mean (standard deviation)) and results from two-way ANOVA among soil water content (SWC), FT, and their interactions (SWC × FT).
| NO3− | NH4+ | DTN | MBN | NNMR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W10C | 28.74 (0.19)a | 7.21 (0.15)b | 45.97 (0.13)bc | 3.12 (0.66)c | 2.60 (0.02)b |
| W10F | 28.78 (1.01)a | 8.49 (0.41)a | 46.65 (0.44)ab | 3.22 (0.30)c | 2.78 (0.19)a |
| W15C | 24.79 (0.30)b | 2.77 (0.43)d | 43.32 (1.09)e | 7.82 (0.40)a | 1.40 (0.07)d |
| W15F | 25.03 (0.33)b | 4.25 (0.50)c | 47.29 (0.43)a | 7.37 (0.31)a | 1.64 (0.08)c |
| W30C | 28.39 (0.39)a | 7.43 (0.25)b | 44.78 (1.05)d | 2.71 (0.13)c | 2.58 (0.09)b |
| W30F | 20.91 (0.41)c | 8.15 (0.04)a | 45.04 (0.61)cd | 5.06 (0.31)b | 1.61 (0.05)c |
| Two-way | ANOVA | ||||
| SWC | 162.3∗∗ | 436.1∗∗ | 8.2∗ | 302.4∗∗ | 290.9∗∗ |
| FT | 132.4∗∗ | 70.4∗∗ | 31.6∗∗ | 17.8∗∗ | 20.1∗∗ |
| SWC × FT | 148.2∗∗ | 2.8 | 16.3∗∗ | 29.3∗∗ | 99.2∗∗ |
Letters indicate the significant difference in each index among the FT treatments (Duncan's HSD test, n = 4, P < 0.05). Asterisks (∗∗P < 0.001 and ∗P < 0.01) indicate the significant influence of FT, SWC, and their interactions in two-way ANOVA.
Figure 1Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot of the soil properties in each soil sample. Ellipses have been drawn for each treatment with a confidence limit of 0.95.
Figure 2Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot of bacterial community composition in each soil sample. The position of each point is the mean of four replicates. Error bars indicate the standard error.
Figure 3The relative abundance of dominant bacterial phyla (averagely >1%) in each treatment. The letters within each row indicate the significant differences among all treatments (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.05).
Figure 4Spearman's correlations between OTUs and soil properties. Only significant correlations to (a) at least one N index or to (b) one or both of the soil water content (SWC) and freeze-thaw treatment (FT) are shown (P < 0.05). MBN: microbial biomass N; NNMR: net N mineralization rate; DTN: dissolved total N; SWC: soil water content; FT: freeze-thaw treatment.
Correlations (squared correlation coefficient retrieved from the redundancy analysis) between bacterial community composition and soil N properties.
| NO3− | NH4+ | DTN | MBN | NNMR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community composition | 0.66∗∗∗ | 0.32∗ | 0.50∗∗∗ | 0.55∗∗∗ | 0.30∗ |
Asterisks (∗∗∗P < 0.001 and ∗P < 0.01) indicate the significant influence.
Parameters of partial correlation networks.
| Number of links ( | Number of nodes ( | Characteristic path length ( | Network diameter ( | Density ( | Clustering coefficient ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 333 | 149 | 4.159 | 4.47 | 0.03 | 0.363 |