Literature DB >> 32255853

Comparison of Swabbing Solution Volume and gDNA Extraction Kits on DNA Recovery from Rigid Surface.

Yeon Jeong Ok1, Hee Sang You1,2, Song Hee Lee1,2, Ho Joong Sung1,2, Hee-Gyoo Kang1,2, Sung Hee Hyun1,2.   

Abstract

For bacteria sampling studies, various collection methods have been used to identify bacteria. To obtain accurate information about bacteria, high quality samples should be obtained. In order to obtain a high quality sample, a stable and large number of DNA copies must be collected. This study compared the efficiency of different methods of bacterial gDNA extraction and bacteria collection according to swabbing solution volumes and types. The efficiency of bacterial genomic DNA extraction was compared using a AccuPrep® Genomic DNA Extraction kit, a QIAamp® DNA Mini kit, and a MOBIO® DNeasy PowerSoil kit. The DNA Mini kit was shown to extract the highest amount of gDNA, and sub-experiments were conducted using this kit. Phosphate-buffered saline and phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 were used as collection solutions of various volumes (0, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, and 120 μL) using cotton swabs. Bacteria collection efficiency was highest when 70 μL PBS was used. The target strains collected in this experiment were Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, and these were quantified using the number of colony-forming units, DNA concentrations, and the number of DNA copies. These results can be used to efficiently bacterial collection for experiments in various fields. © Association of Microbiologists of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria collection; CFUS; Cotton swab; DNA concentration; PBS; PBST; gDNA extraction kit

Year:  2020        PMID: 32255853      PMCID: PMC7105554          DOI: 10.1007/s12088-019-00854-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Microbiol        ISSN: 0046-8991            Impact factor:   2.461


  18 in total

Review 1.  The bacterial cell envelope.

Authors:  Thomas J Silhavy; Daniel Kahne; Suzanne Walker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Forensic identification using skin bacterial communities.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Christian L Lauber; Nick Zhou; Daniel McDonald; Elizabeth K Costello; Rob Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DNA extraction from human saliva deposited on skin and its use in forensic identification procedures.

Authors:  Evelyn Anzai-Kanto; Mário Hiroyuki Hirata; Rosario Dominguez Crespo Hirata; Fabio Daumas Nunes; Rodolfo Francisco Haltenhoff Melani; Rogério Nogueira Oliveira
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2005-11-21

Review 4.  The metagenomics of soil.

Authors:  Rolf Daniel
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.

Authors:  B C M Pang; B K K Cheung
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 1.376

6.  Evaluation of tapelifting as a collection method for touch DNA.

Authors:  Timothy J Verdon; R John Mitchell; Roland A H van Oorschot
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.882

7.  The potential use of bacterial community succession in forensics as described by high throughput metagenomic sequencing.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pechal; Tawni L Crippen; M Eric Benbow; Aaron M Tarone; Scot Dowd; Jeffery K Tomberlin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing.

Authors:  Junjie Qin; Ruiqiang Li; Jeroen Raes; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Kristoffer Solvsten Burgdorf; Chaysavanh Manichanh; Trine Nielsen; Nicolas Pons; Florence Levenez; Takuji Yamada; Daniel R Mende; Junhua Li; Junming Xu; Shaochuan Li; Dongfang Li; Jianjun Cao; Bo Wang; Huiqing Liang; Huisong Zheng; Yinlong Xie; Julien Tap; Patricia Lepage; Marcelo Bertalan; Jean-Michel Batto; Torben Hansen; Denis Le Paslier; Allan Linneberg; H Bjørn Nielsen; Eric Pelletier; Pierre Renault; Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten; Keith Turner; Hongmei Zhu; Chang Yu; Shengting Li; Min Jian; Yan Zhou; Yingrui Li; Xiuqing Zhang; Songgang Li; Nan Qin; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Søren Brunak; Joel Doré; Francisco Guarner; Karsten Kristiansen; Oluf Pedersen; Julian Parkhill; Jean Weissenbach; Peer Bork; S Dusko Ehrlich; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Human occupancy as a source of indoor airborne bacteria.

Authors:  Denina Hospodsky; Jing Qian; William W Nazaroff; Naomichi Yamamoto; Kyle Bibby; Hamid Rismani-Yazdi; Jordan Peccia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Human Microbiome Project: a community resource for the healthy human microbiome.

Authors:  Dirk Gevers; Rob Knight; Joseph F Petrosino; Katherine Huang; Amy L McGuire; Bruce W Birren; Karen E Nelson; Owen White; Barbara A Methé; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  1 in total

1.  Next-Generation Sequencing Results Vary Between Cultured and Uncultured Microbes.

Authors:  Hee Sang You; Song Hee Lee; Young Ju Lee; Han Lee; Sang Sun Kang; Sung Hee Hyun
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.188

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.