Literature DB >> 17320457

Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.

B C M Pang1, B K K Cheung.   

Abstract

Touched evidence is often submitted to forensic laboratories for DNA analysis. Classical stain recovery technique, involving one wet cotton swab, is commonly used for recovering the touched evidence. Double swab technique, using a wet cotton swab followed by a dry cotton swab, was compared with the classical technique for recovering the touched evidence. The wet cotton swabs and the dry cotton swabs were individually extracted. DNA extracts were quantified and amplified at 15 polymorphic loci. DNA recovered in some of the second dry swabs contained sufficient amount of DNA to yield a DNA profile. This study shows that the double swab technique improves the quality of the resulting DNA profiles. The double swab technique for recovering touched evidence at crime scenes is recommended.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17320457     DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2006.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)        ISSN: 1344-6223            Impact factor:   1.376


  12 in total

1.  Simultaneous analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, mRNA and miRNA from backspatter from inside parts of firearms generated by shots at "triple contrast" doped ballistic models.

Authors:  Melanie Grabmüller; Christian Schyma; Jan Euteneuer; Burkhard Madea; Cornelius Courts
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Validation of the PLEX-ID™ mass spectrometry mitochondrial DNA assay.

Authors:  David H Warshauer; Jonathan King; Arthur J Eisenberg; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  An evaluation of the transfer of saliva-derived DNA.

Authors:  David H Warshauer; Pamela Marshall; Shamika Kelley; Jonathan King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Comparison of Swabbing Solution Volume and gDNA Extraction Kits on DNA Recovery from Rigid Surface.

Authors:  Yeon Jeong Ok; Hee Sang You; Song Hee Lee; Ho Joong Sung; Hee-Gyoo Kang; Sung Hee Hyun
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.461

5.  mRNA-based skin identification for forensic applications.

Authors:  Mijke Visser; Dmitry Zubakov; Kaye N Ballantyne; Manfred Kayser
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Forensic trace DNA: a review.

Authors:  Roland Ah van Oorschot; Kaye N Ballantyne; R John Mitchell
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-12-01

7.  Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.

Authors:  Michael S Adamowicz; Dominique M Stasulli; Emily M Sobestanovich; Todd W Bille
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rapid DNA analysis for automated processing and interpretation of low DNA content samples.

Authors:  Rosemary S Turingan; Sameer Vasantgadkar; Luke Palombo; Catherine Hogan; Hua Jiang; Eugene Tan; Richard F Selden
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2016-03-17

9.  Utilizing Moist or Dry Swabs for the Sampling of Nasal MRSA Carriers? An In Vivo and In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Philipp Warnke; Annette Devide; Mirjam Weise; Hagen Frickmann; Norbert Georg Schwarz; Holger Schäffler; Peter Ottl; Andreas Podbielski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A distant relationship?-investigation of correlations between DNA isolated from backspatter traces recovered from firearms, wound profile characteristics, and shooting distance.

Authors:  Jan Euteneuer; Annica Gosch; Philipp Cachée; Cornelius Courts
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.