Literature DB >> 24582043

Effect of the ellipsoid shape of the left ventricular outflow tract on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis.

Clément De Vecchi1, Jérôme Caudron2, Benjamin Dubourg3, Nathalie Pirot1, Valentin Lefebvre3, Fabrice Bauer4, Hélène Eltchaninoff4, Jean-Nicolas Dacher3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed discrepancies between echocardiographic and multidector row CT (MDCT) measurements of aortic valve area (AVA).
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the effect of the ellipsoid shape of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), as shown and measured by MDCT, on the assessment of AVA by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
METHODS: This retrospective single-center study involved 49 patients with severe aortic stenosis referred before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The AVA was deduced from the continuity equation on TTE and from planimetry on cardiac MDCT. Area of the LVOT was calculated as follows: on TTE, from the measurement of LVOT diameter on parasternal long-axis view; on MDCT, from manual planimetry by using multiplanar reconstruction perpendicular to LVOT.
RESULTS: At baseline, correlation of TTE vs MDCT AVA measurements was moderate (R = 0.622; P < .001). TTE underestimated AVA compared with MDCT (0.66 ± 0.15 cm2 vs. 0.87 ± 0.15 cm2; P < .001). After correcting the continuity equation with the LVOT area as measured by MDCT, mean AVA drawn from TTE did not differ from MDCT (0.86 ± 0.2 cm2) and correlation between TTE and MDCT measurements increased (R = 0.704; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Assuming that LVOT area is circular with TTE results in constant underestimation of the AVA with the continuity equation compared with MDCT planimetry. The elliptical not circular shape of LVOT largely explains these discrepancies.
Copyright © 2014 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Continuity equation; Left ventricular outflow tract; MDCT; Transthoracic echocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24582043     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  6 in total

1.  Direct Planimetry of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Area by Simultaneous Biplane Imaging: Challenging the Need for a Circular Assumption of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Shiying Liu; Jessica Churchill; Lanqi Hua; Xin Zeng; Valerie Rhoades; Mayooran Namasivayam; Vinit Baliyan; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Tony Dong; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Jonathan J Passeri; Robert A Levine; Judy Hung
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 2.  The mystery of defining aortic valve area: what have we learnt from three-dimensional imaging modalities?

Authors:  Ebraham Alskaf; Attila Kardos
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2018-02-23

3.  The challenge of co-existent moderate aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic impairment.

Authors:  Russell J Everett; Marc R Dweck; Nicholas L M Cruden
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction.

Authors:  Frédéric Maes; Sophie Pierard; Christophe de Meester; Jamila Boulif; Mihaela Amzulescu; David Vancraeynest; Anne-Catherine Pouleur; Agnès Pasquet; Bernhard Gerber; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 5.  Multimodality imaging in heart valve disease.

Authors:  John B Chambers; Saul G Myerson; Ronak Rajani; Gareth J Morgan-Hughes; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-03-08

Review 6.  Application of Patient-Specific Computational Fluid Dynamics in Coronary and Intra-Cardiac Flow Simulations: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Liang Zhong; Jun-Mei Zhang; Boyang Su; Ru San Tan; John C Allen; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.