Literature DB >> 32248258

Imaging assessment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Michael J Magnetta1, David Casalino1, Matthew T Heller2.   

Abstract

Definitive therapy for prostate cancer includes radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. Treatment is elected based on patient preference, biological tumor factors, and underlying health. Post prostatectomy, men are surveyed for disease recurrence with serial PSA measurements, digital rectal exam, and imaging studies depending on nomogram predicted risk of local disease recurrence and distant metastasis. In men with rising PSA levels, pathologically incomplete surgical margins or, if symptoms of metastasis develop, imaging may be obtained to localize disease. In cases of known biochemical recurrence, imaging is used to target biopsy, to contour in salvage radiation therapy and to assess disease response. For local disease recurrence, the most commonly performed exams are pelvic MRI and transrectal US. CT can evaluate for lymph node metastasis, but is suboptimal in the evaluation of the prostatectomy bed. PET/CT and PET/MRI have been used successfully to evaluate for local disease recurrence. The PI-RADSv2.1 manual provides a risk level and lexicon for use in description of prostate carcinoma prior to prostatectomy, but does not address imaging features post-surgery. A detailed description of nodal, bony, and visceral metastasis is given elsewhere. This manuscript outlines the context in which appropriate imaging exams may be obtained and focuses on imaging findings concerning for local disease recurrence after prostatectomy on various imaging modalities including CT, US, MRI, and PET.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Prostate; Prostatectomy; Recurrence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32248258     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02505-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  37 in total

1.  Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fergus V Coakley; Steven Eberhardt; Michael W Kattan; David C Wei; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael S Cookson; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine Tangen; J Brantley Thrasher; Ian Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Mack Roach; Gerald Hanks; Howard Thames; Paul Schellhammer; William U Shipley; Gerald H Sokol; Howard Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Impact of complete bladder neck preservation on urinary continence, quality of life and surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a randomized, controlled, single blind trial.

Authors:  Joanne N Nyarangi-Dix; Jan Philipp Radtke; Boris Hadaschik; Sascha Pahernik; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Evaluation of the prostate bed for local recurrence after radical prostatectomy using endorectal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stanley L Liauw; Sean P Pitroda; Scott E Eggener; Walter M Stadler; Charles A Pelizzari; Michael W Vannier; Aytek Oto
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Radical prostatectomy with preservation of urinary continence: pathology and long-term results.

Authors:  Douglas L Gaker; Barbara L Steel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jochen Walz; Arthur L Burnett; Anthony J Costello; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Robert P Myers; Bernardo Rocco; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations.

Authors:  P C Walsh; H Lepor; J C Eggleston
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.104

9.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Pelvic MRI findings in relapsed prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  D Hernandez; D Salas; D Giménez; P Buitrago; S Esquena; J Palou; P de la Torre; J Pernas; I Gich; G Gómez de Segura; J Craven-Bartle; G Sancho
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.