Literature DB >> 15538205

Radical prostatectomy with preservation of urinary continence: pathology and long-term results.

Douglas L Gaker1, Barbara L Steel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A continence sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy is described and evaluated. Results are compared with those of patients who underwent a standard anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy previously by the same surgeon.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 275 consecutive patients underwent a continence sparing radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon (DLG) between 1996 and 2003. The technique is described in detail.
RESULTS: Total continence (no pad or device) was found immediately upon catheter removal in 36% of patients, within 14 days in 69% and within 7 weeks in 78%, compared to 1%, 6% and 41% of 80 patients who underwent the standard operation. Median time to total continence was 1 day for the new group versus 63 days for the standard surgery group. Positive margins were found in 6.9% of the new group versus 11% of the first 80 patients. Of the former patients 80% have a prostate specific antigen of less than 0.2 ng/ml at an average followup of 12.5 years. With the new procedure 90% of patients have a prostate specific antigen of less than 0.2 ng/ml with an average followup of 5.2 years. There was no operative mortality or unusual complication. The typical patient was discharged home 1 to 3 days postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the continence mechanism at the level of the bladder neck and proximal prostatic urethra results in earlier return of continence without adversely affecting cancer control. It is a relatively simple way to improve surgical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15538205     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000144071.24113.1c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  A novel method of bladder neck imbrication to improve early urinary continence following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  K Beattie; J Symons; S Chopra; C Yuen; R Savdie; R Thanigasalam; A M Haynes; J Matthews; P C Brenner; K Rasiah; R L Sutherland; P D Stricker
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-07-26

Review 2.  Evidence-based consensus recommendations to improve the quality of life in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Francesc Casas; Josep María Borràs; Ferran Ferrer; Núria Guanyabens; Rafael Gutiérrez del Pozo; Concha León; José López Torrecilla; Begoña Mellado; Joan Morote; Manel Puig; María José Ribal; Carme Ruscalleda; Agustí Serra; Valentí Valls; Almudena Zapatero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Imaging assessment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael J Magnetta; David Casalino; Matthew T Heller
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

4.  A Randomized Control Trial Of Anti-Inflammatory Regional Hypothermia On Urinary Continence During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Linda M Huynh; Douglas Skarecky; James Porter; Christian Wagner; Jorn Witt; Timothy Wilson; Clayton Lau; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Outcome of nephrostomy balloon dilation for vesicourethral anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Chong-Yu Zhang; Yu Zhu; Kin Li; Laphong Ian; Sonfat Ho; Waihong Pun; Hiofai Lao; Vitalino Carvalho; Ding-Yi Liu; Zhou-Jun Shen
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Bladder neck sparing in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michal Smolski; Rachel C Esler; Rafal Turo; Gerald N Collins; Neil Oakley; Richard Brough
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.