Literature DB >> 32246822

Potential False-Negative Nucleic Acid Testing Results for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Thermal Inactivation of Samples with Low Viral Loads.

Yang Pan1,2,3, Luyao Long4,5,6, Daitao Zhang1,2,3, Tingting Yuan7, Shujuan Cui1,2,3, Peng Yang1,2,3, Quanyi Wang1,2,3, Simei Ren4,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has spread widely throughout the world since the end of 2019. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) has played an important role in patient diagnosis and management of COVID-19. In some circumstances, thermal inactivation at 56°C has been recommended to inactivate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) before NAT. However, this procedure could theoretically disrupt nucleic acid integrity of this single-stranded RNA virus and cause false negatives in real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests.
METHODS: We investigated whether thermal inactivation could affect the results of viral NAT. We examined the effects of thermal inactivation on the quantitative RT-PCR results of SARS-CoV-2, particularly with regard to the rates of false-negative results for specimens carrying low viral loads. We additionally investigated the effects of different specimen types, sample preservation times, and a chemical inactivation approach on NAT.
RESULTS: Our study showed increased Ct values in specimens from diagnosed COVID-19 patients in RT-PCR tests after thermal incubation. Moreover, about half of the weak-positive samples (7 of 15 samples, 46.7%) were RT-PCR negative after heat inactivation in at least one parallel testing. The use of guanidinium-based lysis for preservation of these specimens had a smaller impact on RT-PCR results with fewer false negatives (2 of 15 samples, 13.3%) and significantly less increase in Ct values than heat inactivation.
CONCLUSION: Thermal inactivation adversely affected the efficiency of RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Given the limited applicability associated with chemical inactivators, other approaches to ensure the overall protection of laboratory personnel need consideration. © American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; false negative; nucleic acid test; thermal inactivation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32246822      PMCID: PMC7184485          DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  86 in total

1.  Rapid, Affordable, and Scalable SARS-CoV-2 Detection From Saliva.

Authors:  Andrew Hayden; Marcy Kuentzel; Sridar V Chittur
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2021-09

Review 2.  Frontliners on the Move: A Quantitative Analysis of the Prevalence of COVID-19 Reinfection Among Healthcare Workers.

Authors:  Nithin C Kurra; Krithika Sriram; Nikhila Gandrakota; Jai Sivanandan Nagarajan; Sujoy Khasnavis; Manju Ramakrishnan; Suhani Dalal; Shayan A Irfan; Sarah Khan; Hariniska Jk; Dhruv Patel; Gayathri Samudrala
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-01

3.  Methods of Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 for Downstream Biological Assays.

Authors:  Edward I Patterson; Tessa Prince; Enyia R Anderson; Aitor Casas-Sanchez; Shirley L Smith; Cintia Cansado-Utrilla; Tom Solomon; Michael J Griffiths; Álvaro Acosta-Serrano; Lance Turtle; Grant L Hughes
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  False negative results and tolerance limits of SARS-CoV-2 laboratory tests.

Authors:  Hikmet Can Çubukçu; Abdurrahman Coşkun
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Digital PCR assay for the effective detection of COVID-19 patients with SARS-CoV-2 low viral load.

Authors:  Yong Sun; Chengchao Ding; Qingqing Chen; Jiajia Xie; Junling Yu; Yonglin Shi; Chengcheng Jiang; Zhuhui Zhang; Hongliang He; Yinglu Ge; Wenting Li; Jun He; Yong Gao
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.623

Review 6.  Laboratory tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection: basic principles and examples.

Authors:  Khaled R Alkharsah
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-27

7.  Use of guanidine thiocyanate-based nucleic acid extraction buffers to inactivate poliovirus in potentially infectious materials.

Authors:  Michelle J Honeywood; Stacey Jeffries-Miles; Kimberly Wong; Chelsea Harrington; Cara C Burns; M Steven Oberste; Michael D Bowen; Everardo Vega
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.623

8.  Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Jonathan J Deeks; Jacqueline Dinnes; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; René Spijker; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Ada Adriano; Sophie Beese; Janine Dretzke; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Isobel M Harris; Malcolm J Price; Sabine Dittrich; Devy Emperador; Lotty Hooft; Mariska Mg Leeflang; Ann Van den Bruel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-25

9.  Resource-efficient internally controlled in-house real-time PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Janine Michel; Markus Neumann; Eva Krause; Thomas Rinner; Therese Muzeniek; Marica Grossegesse; Georg Hille; Franziska Schwarz; Andreas Puyskens; Sophie Förster; Barbara Biere; Daniel Bourquain; Cristina Domingo; Annika Brinkmann; Lars Schaade; Livia Schrick; Andreas Nitsche
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 10.  Analytical Performance of COVID-19 Detection Methods (RT-PCR): Scientific and Societal Concerns.

Authors:  Roberto Verna; Walter Alallon; Masami Murakami; Catherine P M Hayward; Abdel Halim Harrath; Saleh H Alwasel; Nairo M Sumita; Ozkan Alatas; Valeria Fedeli; Praveen Sharma; Andrea Fuso; Daniela Maria Capuano; Maria Capalbo; Antonio Angeloni; Mariano Bizzarri
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.