Literature DB >> 32245901

Safety and Feasibility of PARP1/2 Imaging with 18F-PARPi in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

Heiko Schöder1,2, Paula Demétrio De Souza França3,4, Reiko Nakajima3, Eva Burnazi5, Sheryl Roberts3, Christian Brand3, Milan Grkovski6, Audrey Mauguen7, Mark P Dunphy3,2, Ronald A Ghossein8, Serge K Lyashchenko3,2,5, Jason S Lewis3,2,5,9, Joseph A O'Donoghue6, Ian Ganly10, Snehal G Patel10, Nancy Y Lee11, Thomas Reiner1,2,12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed a first-in-human clinical trial. The aim of this study was to determine safety and feasibility of PET imaging with 18F-PARPi in patients with head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent oral and oropharyngeal cancer were injected with 18F-PARPi (331 ± 42 MBq), and dynamic PET/CT imaging was performed between 0 and 25 minutes postinjection. Static PET/CT scans were obtained at 30, 60, and 120 minutes postinjection. Blood samples for tracer concentration and metabolite analysis were collected. Blood pressure, ECG, oxygen levels, clinical chemistry, and complete blood count were obtained before and after tracer administration.
RESULTS: 18F-PARPi was well-tolerated by all patients without any safety concerns. Of the 11 patients included in the analysis, 18F-PARPi had focal uptake in all primary lesions (n = 10, SUVmax = 2.8 ± 1.2) and all 18F-FDG-positive lymph nodes (n = 34). 18F-PARPi uptake was seen in 18F-FDG-negative lymph nodes of 3 patients (n = 6). Focal uptake of tracer in primary and metastatic lesions was corroborated by CT alone or in combination with 18F-FDG. The overall effective dose with 18F-PARPi PET was 3.9 mSv - 5.2 mSv, contrast was high [SUVmax(lesion)/SUVmax(trapezius muscle) = 4.5] and less variable than 18F-FDG when compared with the genioglossus muscle (1.3 vs. 6.0, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging of head and neck cancer with 18F-PARPi is feasible and safe. 18F-PARPi detects primary and metastatic lesions, and retention in tumors is longer than in healthy tissues. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32245901      PMCID: PMC7421489          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  19 in total

1.  Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome.

Authors:  Mathias Uhlén; Linn Fagerberg; Björn M Hallström; Cecilia Lindskog; Per Oksvold; Adil Mardinoglu; Åsa Sivertsson; Caroline Kampf; Evelina Sjöstedt; Anna Asplund; IngMarie Olsson; Karolina Edlund; Emma Lundberg; Sanjay Navani; Cristina Al-Khalili Szigyarto; Jacob Odeberg; Dijana Djureinovic; Jenny Ottosson Takanen; Sophia Hober; Tove Alm; Per-Henrik Edqvist; Holger Berling; Hanna Tegel; Jan Mulder; Johan Rockberg; Peter Nilsson; Jochen M Schwenk; Marica Hamsten; Kalle von Feilitzen; Mattias Forsberg; Lukas Persson; Fredric Johansson; Martin Zwahlen; Gunnar von Heijne; Jens Nielsen; Fredrik Pontén
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  False-positive uptake of 18F-FDG in hypoglossal nerve palsy following chemoradiotherapy for tongue base cancer.

Authors:  Zenia Chow; Jody McIvor; Olivia McDonnell; Ziyad Khaleel
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Survival outcomes after treatment of cancer of the oral cavity (1985-2015).

Authors:  Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Pablo H Montero; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Jatin P Shah; Richard J Wong; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Do we need a different staging system for tongue and gingivobuccal complex squamous cell cancers?

Authors:  Piyush Gupta; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Pablo H Montero; Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel; Ian Ganly
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 5.337

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seong-Jang Kim; Kyoungjune Pak; Keunyoung Kim
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  Post-treatment surveillance of head and neck cancer: pitfalls in the interpretation of FDG PET-CT/MRI.

Authors:  Christian Martin Meerwein; Marcelo A Queiroz; Spyros Kollias; Martin Hüllner; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Gerhard Frank Huber
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Non-invasive PET Imaging of PARP1 Expression in Glioblastoma Models.

Authors:  Brandon Carney; Giuseppe Carlucci; Beatriz Salinas; Valentina Di Gialleonardo; Susanne Kossatz; Axel Vansteene; Valerie A Longo; Alexander Bolaender; Gabriela Chiosis; Kayvan R Keshari; Wolfgang A Weber; Thomas Reiner
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  PET-CT Surveillance versus Neck Dissection in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Hisham Mehanna; Wai-Lup Wong; Christopher C McConkey; Joy K Rahman; Max Robinson; Andrew G J Hartley; Christopher Nutting; Ned Powell; Hoda Al-Booz; Martin Robinson; Elizabeth Junor; Mohammed Rizwanullah; Sandra V von Zeidler; Hulya Wieshmann; Claire Hulme; Alison F Smith; Peter Hall; Janet Dunn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Metastatic Lymph Node Burden and Survival in Oral Cavity Cancer.

Authors:  Allen S Ho; Sungjin Kim; Mourad Tighiouart; Cynthia Gudino; Alain Mita; Kevin S Scher; Anna Laury; Ravi Prasad; Stephen L Shiao; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Zachary S Zumsteg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 50.717

10.  PET Imaging of PARP Expression Using 18F-Olaparib.

Authors:  Thomas C Wilson; Mary-Ann Xavier; James Knight; Stefan Verhoog; Julia Baguña Torres; Michael Mosley; Samantha L Hopkins; Sheena Wallington; Phillip D Allen; Veerle Kersemans; Rebekka Hueting; Sean Smart; Véronique Gouverneur; Bart Cornelissen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  13 in total

1.  A one-pot radiosynthesis of [18 F]PARPi.

Authors:  Thomas C Wilson; Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty; Thomas Reiner
Journal:  J Labelled Comp Radiopharm       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 1.921

2.  PARP1: A Potential Molecular Marker to Identify Cancer During Colposcopy Procedures.

Authors:  Paula Demétrio de Souza França; Navjot Guru; Abigail R Kostolansky; Audrey Mauguen; Giacomo Pirovano; Susanne Kossatz; Sheryl Roberts; Marcio Abrahão; Snehal G Patel; Kay J Park; Thomas Reiner; Elizabeth Jewell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Sulfur [18F]Fluoride Exchange Click Chemistry Enabled Ultrafast Late-Stage Radiosynthesis.

Authors:  Qinheng Zheng; Hongtao Xu; Hua Wang; Wen-Ge Han Du; Nan Wang; Huan Xiong; Yuang Gu; Louis Noodleman; K Barry Sharpless; Guang Yang; Peng Wu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  Insight into the Development of PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Oncology.

Authors:  Joseph Lau; Etienne Rousseau; Daniel Kwon; Kuo-Shyan Lin; François Bénard; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Preclinical and first-in-human-brain-cancer applications of [18F]poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor PET/MR.

Authors:  Robert J Young; Paula Demétrio De Souza França; Giacomo Pirovano; Anna F Piotrowski; Philip J Nicklin; Christopher C Riedl; Jazmin Schwartz; Tejus A Bale; Patrick L Donabedian; Susanne Kossatz; Eva M Burnazi; Sheryl Roberts; Serge K Lyashchenko; Alexandra M Miller; Nelson S Moss; Megan Fiasconaro; Zhigang Zhang; Audrey Mauguen; Thomas Reiner; Mark P Dunphy
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2020-09-15

6.  Two experts and a newbie: [18F]PARPi vs [18F]FTT vs [18F]FPyPARP-a comparison of PARP imaging agents.

Authors:  Sophie Stotz; Johannes Kinzler; Anne T Nies; Matthias Schwab; Andreas Maurer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  DNA Repair Enzyme Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1/2 (PARP1/2)-Targeted Nuclear Imaging and Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nghia T Nguyen; Anna Pacelli; Michael Nader; Susanne Kossatz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Perspective on the Use of DNA Repair Inhibitors as a Tool for Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Liesbeth Everix; Shankari Nair; Cathryn H S Driver; Ingeborg Goethals; Mike M Sathekge; Thomas Ebenhan; Charlot Vandevoorde; Julie Bolcaen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Radiosynthesis and Evaluation of Talazoparib and Its Derivatives as PARP-1-Targeting Agents.

Authors:  Dong Zhou; Huaping Chen; Cedric Mpoy; Sadia Afrin; Buck E Rogers; Joel R Garbow; John A Katzenellenbogen; Jinbin Xu
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-05-18

10.  [18F]PARPi Imaging Is Not Affected by HPV Status In Vitro.

Authors:  Navjot Guru; Paula Demétrio De Souza França; Giacomo Pirovano; Cien Huang; Snehal G Patel; Thomas Reiner
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.