Literature DB >> 25701645

Post-treatment surveillance of head and neck cancer: pitfalls in the interpretation of FDG PET-CT/MRI.

Christian Martin Meerwein1, Marcelo A Queiroz2, Spyros Kollias3, Martin Hüllner2, Patrick Veit-Haibach2, Gerhard Frank Huber1.   

Abstract

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: We investigated non-malignancy-associated (¹⁸F)fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake in the head and neck cancer (HNC) post-treatment follow-up with positron emission tomography - computed tomography / magnetic resonance imaging (PET-CT/MRI). A retrospective study on HNC patients undergoing follow-up or re-staging PET-CT/MRI examinations was performed. Thereby, FDG-positive regions were morphologically correlated to the CT and MRI images and a statement regarding tumour persistence/recurrence.
METHODS: FDG-positive lesions were assessed according to their anatomical localisation and categorised as true positive, true negative, false positive or false negative findings. The gold standard for verification of an FDG-positive lesion was the cytological or histopathological examination of the region of interest. The most likely aetiology was assessed according to the following categories: (1.) physiological uptake (2.) post-surgical, inflammatory uptake, (3.) post-irradiation, inflammatory uptake and (4.) reactive, not otherwise specified.
RESULTS: Tumour recurrence / tumour persistence was found in 14/87 patients (16.1%). A total of 159 non-malignancy-associated FDG-positive lesions were found. Every PET-CT/MRI examination revealed 2.1 ± 1.5 FDG-positive lesions in the head and neck. A total of 107 FDG-positive lesions (67.3%) were categorised as physiological, 52 FDG-positive lesions (32.7%) as inflammatory (post-surgical: n = 14, 8.8%; post-irradiation: n = 9, 5.7%; reactive, not otherwise specified: n = 29, 18.2%). Eight patients (11.8%) underwent invasive diagnostic procedures to clarify indistinct findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-treatment follow-up of HNC patients requires interdisciplinary management and familiarity with the patient's past medical history. Awareness of common confounders of FDG positivity often allows clarification of indistinct lesions. However, a substantial number of approximately 12% of FDG-positive lesions remain unclear unless invasive diagnostic procedures are performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25701645     DOI: 10.4414/smw.2015.14116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  4 in total

1.  Fluorine-18 labeled poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase1 inhibitor as a potential alternative to 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography in oral cancer imaging.

Authors:  Paula Demétrio de Souza França; Sheryl Roberts; Susanne Kossatz; Navjot Guru; Christian Mason; Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Marcio Abrahão; Heiko Schöder; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel; Thomas Reiner
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Second-look PET-CT following an initial incomplete PET-CT response to (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robin J D Prestwich; Moses Arunsingh; Jim Zhong; Karen E Dyker; Sriram Vaidyanathan; Andrew F Scarsbrook
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Safety and Feasibility of PARP1/2 Imaging with 18F-PARPi in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Paula Demétrio De Souza França; Reiko Nakajima; Eva Burnazi; Sheryl Roberts; Christian Brand; Milan Grkovski; Audrey Mauguen; Mark P Dunphy; Ronald A Ghossein; Serge K Lyashchenko; Jason S Lewis; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel; Nancy Y Lee; Thomas Reiner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  FDG-PET/CT for oral focus assessment in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Dominic Raphael Schwaninger; Martin Hüllner; Dominique Bichsel; Barbara Giacomelli-Hiestand; Nicole Selina Stutzmann; Panagiotis Balermpas; Silvio Valdec; Bernd Stadlinger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.606

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.