Clinical Course and Outcomes of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: a Preliminary Report of the First 28 Patients from the Korean Cohort Study on COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected pneumonia emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019. In this retrospective multicenter study, we investigated the clinical course and outcomes of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from early cases in Republic of Korea.
METHODS: All of the cases confirmed by real time polymerase chain reaction were enrolled from the 1st to the 28th patient nationwide. Clinical data were collected and analyzed for changes in clinical severity including laboratory, radiological, and virologic dynamics during the progression of illness.
RESULTS: The median age was 40 years (range, 20-73 years) and 15 (53.6%) patients were male. The most common symptoms were cough (28.6%) and sore throat (28.6%), followed by fever (25.0%). Diarrhea was not common (10.7%). Two patients had no symptoms. Initial chest X-ray (CXR) showed infiltration in 46.4% of the patients, but computed tomography scan confirmed pneumonia in 88.9% (16/18) of the patients. Six patients (21.4%) required supplemental oxygen therapy, but no one needed mechanical ventilation. Lymphopenia was more common in severe cases. Higher level of C-reactive protein and worsening of chest radiographic score was observed during the 5-7 day period after symptom onset. Viral shedding was high from day 1 of illness, especially from the upper respiratory tract (URT).
CONCLUSION: The prodromal symptoms of COVID-19 were mild and most patients did not have limitations of daily activity. Viral shedding from URT was high from the prodromal phase. Radiological pneumonia was common from the early days of illness, but it was frequently not evident in simple CXR. These findings could be plausible explanations for the easy and rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the community.

INTRODUCTION

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected pneumonia has been initially identified in Wuhan, China since December 2019.1 A total number of 693,224 laboratory-confirmed cases have been documented globally as of March 30th, 2020, including 33,106 deaths.2 After experiencing the largest outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outside the Arabian Peninsula in 2015,3 the Korean government has maintained a strong quarantine system for emerging infectious diseases imported from foreign countries. The first novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case in Korea was a traveler from Wuhan, China in January 19th, 2020.4 While the spread of COVID-19 was limited before February 20,56 a huge outbreak occurred among a religious group in the southern part of Korea, Daegu, and the number of COVID-19 cases in Korea reached 6,593 on March 6th, 2020.78

While clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19 have been described in China by several investigations,91011121314 most of them focused on SARS-CoV-2-infected pneumonia in China. There is still uncertainty about the clinical course and outcomes of COVID-19, especially outside of China where patients can be detected in the early course of disease by the quarantine system. Recently, the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) reported epidemiological features of the earliest 28 COVID-19 cases in Republic of Korea.15 We performed this study to describe the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in Republic of Korea, including radiological and virologic dynamics during the progression of illness.

METHODS

Study design and participants

Korea National Committee for Clinical Management of COVID-19 (KNCCMC) was organized in early February 2020 and consisted of infectious disease specialists or physicians of each hospital who took care of the confirmed COVID-19 patients. KNCCMC developed a standardized clinical record form (CRF) which was modified from the World Health Organization Global 2019-novel coronavirus clinical characterization CRF.16 Individual cases were reviewed and treatment and discharge plans were discussed during regular video conference calls three time a week. All of cases nationwide were enrolled in this study from the 1st to the 28th patient. Participating hospitals were as follows: Seoul National University Hospital, National Medical Center, and Seoul Medical Center, Seoul; Incheon Medical Center, Incheon; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam; Myongji Hospital, Goyang; Gyeonggi Provincial Medical Center Ansung Hospital, Anseong; Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan; Chonnam National University Hospital and Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Case definitions

According to the definition of the KCDC,7 a suspected COVID-19 patient was defined as someone fulfilling both of the following criteria: 1) a presence of at least one condition among fever; respiratory symptoms such as cough, sore throat, or dyspnea; or radiographic evidence of pneumonia, 2) a recent visit to countries where SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the community has been reported including Wuhan city, China or recent close contact with a confirmed COVID-19 patient within 14 days before illness onset. A confirmed case was defined as a patient with positive results by real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for SARS-CoV-2 in upper respiratory specimen (nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab), with or without lower respiratory specimen (sputum). The patients who had no symptoms but had been screened for COVID-19 due to a strong epidemiologic link were also enrolled when they were laboratory-confirmed.

Viral diagnostic methods

Respiratory samples from the patients were sent to the KCDC and RT-PCR for detecting SARS-CoV-2 was performed as in previous study.17 In brief, RNA was extracted from clinical samples with a QIAamp® viral RNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The primer and probe sequences used for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene detection were: 5′-GTGARATGGTCATGTGTGGCGG-3′ (Forward), 5′-CARATGTTAAASACACTATTAGCATA-′3 (Reverse) and 5′-CAGGTGGAACCTCATCAGGAGATGC-3′ (Probe in 5-FAM/3′-BHQ format) and the primer and probe sequences used for E gene detection were: 5′-ACAGGTACGTTAATAGTTAATAGCGT-3′ (Forward), 5′-ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACA-3′ (Reverse) and 5′-ACACTAGCCATCCTTACTGCGCTTCG-3′ (Probe in 5-FAM/3′-BHQ format). Reverse transcription was performed at 50°C for 30 minutes, followed by inactivation of the reverse transcriptase at 95°C for 10 minutes. PCR amplification was performed with 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute using an ABI 7500 Fast instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Clinical data collection and severity evaluation

Primary physicians from each participating hospital retrospectively collected clinical medical record data then two infectious disease physicians from KNCCMC reassessed the accuracy of the raw data. Patients were hospitalized in the isolation units in each hospital from January 19th, 2020, with final follow-up for the study on February 17th, 2020. Epidemiologic, demographic, and clinical information including laboratory and radiologic findings were obtained. Clinical severity and changes according to days after first symptom onset were assessed as follows: 1, no limit of daily activity; 2, limit of daily activity but no need for supplemental O2 therapy; 3, need for supplemental O2 therapy via nasal prong; 4, need for supplemental O2 therapy via facial mask; 5, need for high flow supplemental O2 therapy or non-invasive ventilation; 6, need for invasive ventilation; 7, multi-organ failure or need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy; 8, death.

Chest radiograph scoring was performed as described in a previous study18: in brief, serial chest radiographs were retrospectively reviewed in consensus by four physicians who were unaware of the clinical conditions of the patients. Each lung was divided into the upper, middle, and lower zone, and infiltrations on each zone were scored from 0 to 4, with a total range of 0 to 24.

Ethics statement

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Seoul National University Hospital reviewed and approved the study protocol (IRB registration No. H-2002-042-1100). After that, the IRB at each participating hospital approved it. The board waived the requirement for written consent.

RESULTS

Patients and clinical characteristics

The study population included 28 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19. The median age of the 28 patients was 40 years (interquartile range, 28–54; range, 20–73), and 15 (53.6%) were men. Of the 28 patients, five (17.9%) had one or more coexisting medical condition and diabetes was most common (Table 1). The most common symptoms at the time of admission for isolation were cough (8, 28.6%) and sore throat (8, 28.6%), followed by fever, myalgia, and headache (7, 25.0%). Diarrhea was present in three patients (10.7%) among initial symptoms. Two cases were asymptomatic when they were confirmed as COVID-19.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of 28 patients with COVID-19 at the time of admission for isolation

Characteristics		Values
Age, yr		42.6 ± 13.4
Sex
	Male	15 (53.6)
	Female	13 (46.4)
Comorbidity
	Hypertension	0
	Dyslipidemia	0
	Diabetes without complication	2 (7.1)
	Chronic cardiac disease	0
	Chronic kidney disease	0
	Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease	0
	Asthma	1 (3.6)
	Liver disease, mild	1 (3.6)
	Malignancy	1 (3.6)
	HIV/AIDS	0
Obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m2)		5 (17.9)
Smoking		5/27 (18.5)
Symptom onset to isolation
	0–1 day	6/26 (23.1)
	2–3 days	7/26 (26.9)
	4–5 days	7/26 (26.9)
	≥ 6 days	6/26 (23.1)
Symptoms on admission day
	Fever (> 37.5°C)	7 (25.0)
	Cough	8 (28.6)
	Sputum	6 (21.4)
	Sore throat	8 (28.6)
	Rhinorrhea	2 (7.1)
	Myalgia	7 (25.0)
	Fatigue	3 (10.7)
	Shortness of breath	1 (3.6)
	Headache	7 (25.0)
	Abdominal pain	1 (3.6)
	Diarrhea	3 (10.7)
Blood leukocyte count
	≤ 4.0 × 109/L	7 (25.0)
	> 4.0 × 109/L	21 (75.0)
Lymphocyte count, 109/L		1.563 ± 0.864
	Lymphopenia (≤ 1.0 × 109/L)	7 (25.0)
Platelet count
	≤ 150 × 109/L	15 (53.6)
	> 150 × 109/L	13 (46.4)
Haemoglobin level, g/dL		15.5 ± 5.0
C-reactive protein level ≥ 10 mg/L		11/27 (40.7)
Procalcitonin level ≥ 0.5 ng/mL		0/11
Lactate dehydrogenase ≥ 250 U/L		11/26 (42.3)
Creatinine ≥ 133 μmol/L		0
Alanine aminotransferase > 40 U/L		6 (21.4)
Infiltration in chest X-ray
	None	15 (53.6)
	Unilateral	7 (25.0)
	Bilateral	6 (21.4)
Infiltration in computed tomography
	None	2/18 (11.1)
	Unilateral	8/18 (44.4)
	Bilateral	8/18 (44.4)

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).

COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, HIV = human immunodeficiency viruses, AIDS = acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

Clinical course and outcomes

During the hospitalization, six patients (21.4%) required oxygen supplement therapy: four with nasal cannula and two with face mask. No one required mechanical ventilator or ECMO therapy. Nineteen patients (67.9%) received lopinavir/ritonavir for antiviral therapy. Ultimately, pneumonia was present in 22 patients (78.5%) and the proportion of pneumonia was 91.3% (21/23) among the patients who received a CT scan (Table 2). Seventeen patients (60.7%) developed fever and became afebrile during the hospitalization and the median day of defervescence was 9 days (range, 3–18) after symptom onset (Supplementary Fig. 1). By February 17, 10 patients were off isolation or discharged, and the median day of off-isolation/discharge was 18.5 days after symptom onset (range, 11–27).

Table 2

Clinical course and outcomes of 28 patients with COVID-19

Case No.	Risk factor	Maximum pneumonia extent	Radiology modality	Oxygen supplement by ID	Maximal oxygen (L/min)	Antiviral therapy	Outcome on Feb 17
1	Obesity	Bilateral	CXR/CT	2–15	Mask, 10	LPV/r	Discharge/off isolation on ID 20
2	Age ≥ 55	Bilateral	CXR/CT	-	-	LPV/r	Discharge/off isolation on ID 27
3	-	Bilateral	CXR/CT	11–19	Nasal, 2	LPV/r	Discharge/off isolation on ID 22
4	Age ≥ 55, obesity, smoking	Bilateral	CXR/CT	5–11	Nasal, 6	LPV/r	Discharge/off isolation on ID 19
5	Asthma	Bilateral	CT only	-	-	LPV/r	Isolation without oxygen
6	Age ≥ 55, DM	Bilateral	CT only	-	-	No	Isolation without oxygen
7	-	Unilateral	CXR/CT	-	-	LPV/r	Discharge/off isolation on ID 22
8	Age ≥ 55	Bilateral	CXR/CT	-	-	LPV/r	Discharge/off isolation on ID 18
9	-	Bilateral	CXR/CT	-	-	LPV/r	Isolation without oxygen
10	-	Bilateral	CT only	-	-	No	Isolation without oxygen
11	-	Unilateral	CXR/CT	-	-	No	Discharge/off isolation on ID 13
12	Obesity, smoking	Bilateral	CXR/CT	-	-	LPV/r	Isolation without oxygen
13	-	Bilateral	CT only	-	-	No	Isolation without oxygen
14	-	Bilateral	CT only	-	-	LPV/r	Isolation without oxygen
15	Obesity, smoking	None	CXRa	-	-	No	Isolation without oxygen
16	Malignancy	Bilateral	CXR/CT	7–8	Nasal, 3	LPV/r	Isolation without oxygen
17	-	Unilateral	CT only	-	-	No	Discharge/off isolation on ID 18
18	Obesity	None	CXRa	-	-	LPV/r	Isolation without oxygen
19	Obesity	Bilateral	CXR/CT	-	-	LPV/r	Isolation without oxygen
20	Smoking	Unilateral	CXRa	6–12	Nasal, 5	LPV/r	Isolation with oxygen nasal cannula
21	Age ≥ 55, DM	Bilateral	CT only	-	-	No	Isolation without oxygen
22	Obesity	Unilateral	CXR/CT	-	-	LPV/r	Discharge/off isolation on ID 11
23	Age ≥ 55	Bilateral	CXR/CT	7–15	Mask, 6	LPV/r	Isolation with oxygen facial mask
24	-	None	CXR/CT	-	-	LPV/r	Isolation without oxygen
25	Age ≥ 55	Unilateral	CT only	-	-	LPV/r	Isolation without oxygen
26	Smoking	None	CXRa	-	-	LPV/r	Isolation without oxygen
27	Obesity	None	CXRa	-	-	No	Isolation without oxygen
28	-	None	CXR/CT	-	-	No	Discharge/off isolation on Feb 17

COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, ID = illness day, CT = computed tomography, CXR = chest X-ray, LPV/r = lopinavir/ritonavir, DM = diabetes mellitus.

aOnly CXRs were performed.

Chronological changes of COVID-19

Except for 2 patients who showed no symptoms, six among 26 patients showed clinical deterioration during the hospitalization and needed supplemental oxygen therapy (Supplementary Fig. 2). The others showed little limitation in daily activity during the hospitalization.

While neutrophilia or neutropenia was not common regardless of clinical severity (Fig. 1A and B), lymphopenia (defined as ≤ 1.0 × 109/L) was more common in severe cases (33.3%, 2/6) than mild cases (18.2%, 4/22) during the clinical course (Fig. 1C and D). High levels of C-reactive protein in the blood were more frequently observed in severe cases (Fig. 1E and F) as the clinical course became worse during the 5–7 day period after symptom onset.

Fig. 1

Changes in laboratory data according to severity over time in 28 patients with COVID-19. Changes in peripheral blood neutrophil counts is shown in (A) and (B) according to requirement of O2 therapy, respectively. Changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte counts is shown in (C) and (D). Changes in CRP is shown in (E) and (F).

COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, CRP = C-reactive protein, Pt = patient.

We could evaluate viral kinetics by serial RT-PCR of respiratory specimens from 9 patients from the early course of illness. Viral shedding from upper respiratory tract (URT) and lower respiratory tract (LRT) was shown in Fig. 2A and B as cycle threshold (Ct) value, respectively (Supplementary Table 1). Viral shedding was high during the first 5 days of illness and higher in URT than LRT. It decreased after day 7 of illness.

Fig. 2

Changes in SARS-CoV-2 Ct value of RT-PCR in respiratory specimens and radiologic features over time. Changes of Ct value of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (envelope gene, E) in nasopharyngeal with or without oropharyngeal specimen is shown in (A) in 9 patients with COVID-19. Changes of Ct value of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (E) in lower respiratory specimen (expectorate sputum) is shown in (B). Progression of pneumonia in 28 patients is shown in (C). Each lung was divided into the upper, middle, and lower zones, and infiltrates on each zone were scored from 0 to 4 (maximum CXR score, 24).

SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Ct = cycle threshold, RT-PCR = real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, Pt = patient, CXR = chest X-ray.

Infiltration on initial chest X-ray was observed in 13 patients (46.4%), but pneumonia was confirmed in most patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) scan initially (16/18, 88.9%) (Table 1). The chest radiographic scores remained relatively stable during the first week of illness. However, around day 7 of illness, the scores began to increase in some patients, suggesting progression of pneumonia (Fig. 2C).

DISCUSSION

We report the clinical course and outcomes of the first 28 patients with COVID-19 in Republic of Korea. The clinical severity was mild symptomatic or asymptomatic in 78.6% (22/28) of the patients. The most common prodromal symptoms were sore throat, cough, fever, and myalgia, which was suggestive of common cold. Although radiological pneumonia was detected in the majority (22/28, 78.6%) of the patients, only 27.3% (6/22) of them required supplemental oxygen therapy. Radiological pneumonia was detected as early as from the 1st day of illness onset, and was even identified in patients who did not have any symptoms of the LRT infection, such as cough, sputum, chest pain, or dyspnea. Although they had radiological pneumonia, they did not feel unwell and were able to carry on their daily activities as usual (“walking pneumonia”). The titers of SARS-CoV-2 shedding from the URT were very high from the prodromal phase of illness until day 5 of illness.

In our patient cohort, the clinical features of COVID-19 during the prodromal phase were insidious and mild. Fever was absent in 75.0% of the patients at the time of admission. Throat symptoms, such as pain, discomfort and globus sensation and cough were ranked as relatively common, but only 1/3 had these symptoms. As the prodromal symptoms were mild and did not begin abruptly, most of the patients were not able to tell exactly when they had become ill. And because of this benign nature of the prodromal symptoms, they did not realize that they had been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and went out to carry on usual activities, while spreading the virus inadvertently.

The defining clinical characteristic of COVID-19 was an early development of radiological pneumonia. During the prodromal phase, only 1/3 of our patients developed any clinical features suggesting pneumonia, such as cough, sputum, or chest discomfort. Chest radiographs on hospitalization did not reveal any infiltrates in more than 50% of patients. However, chest CT scans, which were performed on hospitalization or within 1–2 days, showed infiltrates in the lungs suggesting viral pneumonia in 16/18 (88.9%) patients (Table 1). If we had not taken CT scans of the lungs, we would have easily missed the pneumonia diagnosis.4 The radiological pneumonia from CT scan was detected as early as day 1 of illness onset. The most common findings of CT scans were bilateral, ground-glass opacity in the periphery of the lungs as described in previous studies.91112 Despite radiological pneumonia, the patients were clinically stable and mobile during the first week of illness (“walking pneumonia”). We assessed the progression of COVID-19 pneumonia using the chest radiograph scoring, and it remained stable during the first week of illness, but increased around the day 7 of illness. This pattern of pneumonia progression was also noted in patients with MERS-CoV infection.18 The early onset of the lung infiltrates and few clinical manifestations of LRT infection may suggest that the virus can invade into the LRT, evading innate immune mechanisms and replicate before adaptive immune response begins to play a role. A tissue biopsy and immunohistopathological studies of the lungs may elucidate this unique and interesting clinical feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Gastrointestinal manifestations were relatively uncommon in our patient cohort. While 10% of the patients had diarrhea, 3% had vomiting, and 3% had abdominal pain at presentation, all of them revealed other common symptoms of acute respiratory illness. Overall, diarrhea was present in 39% (11/28) of patients during hospitalization from the admission in this study. As diarrhea is an adverse effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, we reassessed the frequency of diarrhea according to the patients being treated with lopinavir/ritonavir or not, and 53% (10/19) and 11% (1/9) of our patients had diarrhea, respectively (data not shown). In Chinese patients, the frequency of diarrhea ranged 2%–10%.91112 It is important to note that receptor binding is a major determinant of tissue tropism for a coronavirus.19 A recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 used angiotensin converting enzyme II as a cellular entry receptor,2021 as SARS-CoV.19 Therefore, it is plausible that SARS-CoV-2 may be able to replicate in the gastrointestinal epithelial cells and be excreted in the stool. Recently, China CDC reported that they isolated SARS-CoV-2 from a stool sample taken 15 days after illness onset of a laboratory confirmed patient.22 The possibilities of fecal-to-oral transmission and opportunistic aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 remain to be determined.23

It is important to note that the virus titers in the respiratory specimens peaked on early days after illness onset (Fig. 2A and B). Of the seven infectors of our cohort, two transmitted the virus on the first day of illness, one on the 8th day of illness, and 4 via household transmission. The Ct values of the URT specimens ranged from 18–25 in the 4 infectors within the 5 days of illness: 18.74, 18.33, 25.12, and 21.5 for each patient. Our data suggest that the viral shedding from the URT may reach its peak during the first 3-5 days after illness onset. A recent study on virus shedding kinetics is also in line with our finding.24 This “shift to the left” pattern of virus shedding kinetics is strikingly different from that of SARS-CoV, which shows an inverted V pattern, with its peak at day 10 of illness.25 Also of note is that 57.1% (4/7) of infectors had cough or sputum, in contrast to only 23.8% (5/21) of non-infectors having cough. These findings suggest that the transmissions of SARS-CoV-2 may occur easily and begin from the prodromal phase of illness, just like common cold or influenza viruses. Considering that the median time from symptom onset to isolation of the patients was 3 days, and that high titers of virus shedding began from day 1 of illness with the peak around day 3–5 of illness, early detection and isolation strategy may be relatively less effective in containing the virus in COVID-19.

The clinical outcomes of most patients in this study were not complicated. As of 17 February 2020, no patient required supplemental oxygen therapy with mechanical ventilation nor any organ-supporting treatments in intensive care unit. A total of 10 cases have fully recovered from the infection and have been discharged from hospital. Of the 18 confirmed cases who are still in hospital, most are stable or improving.

There are some limitations in our study. Only 28 patients from our cohort were included in this study. However, we gathered and analyzed the detailed clinical information about all of the first 28 cases nationwide in Republic of Korea. Moreover, some cases were confirmed during the surveillance test for COVID-19 after exposure to SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of elderly patients and frequency of underlying conditions were small, and therefore the first 28 patients from the early phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in Korea had relatively favorable outcomes.26 Most of the enrolled patients would be healthier than the population of recent larger outbreaks showing worse outcomes, mostly in the elderly group. The results regarding outcomes in this study should be interpreted cautiously. In most cases, we did not perform virologic tests for coinfection of other respiratory viruses such as influenza.

Our study suggests that (1) the prodromal symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection were mild, (2) radiological pneumonia was very common, and developed from the early days of illness, (3) pneumonia may progress at day 7 of illness, (4) high titers of the virus shed from the URT during the prodromal phase (5), and the median time from symptom onset to defervescence was 10 days and to off-isolation 18.5 days.