| Literature DB >> 32240222 |
Alexander I Chacon1, Alexander Baer1, James K Wheeler1, Jarmila Pittermann1.
Abstract
California's coastal climate is characterized by rainy winters followed by a dry summer season that is supplemented by frequent fog. While rising temperatures and drought caused massive treeEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32240222 PMCID: PMC7117729 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The mean daily temperature in Santa Cruz and Gilroy, California from April to November, 2014.
Precipitation data are shown for Santa Cruz only; Gilroy received slightly less rain. The maritime influence buffered the temperature in Santa Cruz relative to Gilroy.
Fig 6Vessel diameter distributions in stems of Q. agrifolia and A. menziesii (n = 4 stems per species).
Inset micrographs show the typical stem xylem structure of these two species.
Means, standard deviations, and P-values for traits derived from leaf pressure-volume curves, hydraulic and anatomical measures.
The sample size is n = 6 for all traits except vessel density, where n = 4.
| Water potential at the turgor loss point ψTLP (MPa) | -2.58 ± 0.5 | -1.91 ± 0.57 | P = 0.026 |
| Modulus of elasticity, ε (MPa) | 30.58 ± 8.38 | 15.14 ± 3.44 | P < 0.001 |
| Osmotic potential at full turgor, π (MPa) | -2.15 ± 0.65 | -1.26 ± 0.49 | P = 0.008 |
| Relative water content at the turgor loss point, RWC (%) | 92.8 ± 2.29 | 91.98 ± 2.32 | P = 0.49 |
| Huber value (wood:leaf area) | 3.92e-0.5 ± 8.32e-06 | 3.62e-05 ± 2.03e-0.5 | P = 0.24 |
| Specific Conductivity (Ks, kg MPa-1 s-1 m-1) | 2.29 ± 1.06 | 2.06 ± 0.41 | P = 0.64 |
| Vessel Density (vessels m-2) | 9.25e+07 ± 7.45e+07 | 4.73e+08 ± 6.74e+07 | P < 0.001 |
| Leaf δ13C values (‰) | -31.47 ± 0.84 | -31.85 ± 0.61 | P = 0.4 |
Fig 2Seasonal mid-day water potential and stomatal conductance measures for Q. agrifolia and A. menziesii during the 2014 summer and fall season in 2014.
Sample size was n = 3–6 leaves per species per day, although n = 4 leaves for the majority of the measures.
Fig 3Seasonal diurnal measures of water potential and stomatal conductance in Q. agrifolia and A. menziesii.
N = 3 leaves per species per hour.
Fig 4The percent loss of conductivity as a function of xylem pressure (vulnerability curve) in 14.2 cm stems of Q. agrifolia (P50 = -1.96 ± 0.32 MPa) and A. menziesii (P50 = -3.0 ± 0.33 MPa; n = 6 per species).
The inset shows the vulnerability curve on 25.2 cm stems of Q. agrifolia (P50 = -1.79 ± 0.67 MPa; n = 6) as well as the native PLC values for this species.
Fig 5Mean (in black) and minimum to maximum range (in gray) predicted percent loss of conductivity (PLC) for A. menziesii (A) and Q. agrifiolia (B) over the measurement period. The predictions are based on the mean, minimum and maximum water potential recorded at each time point and the mean PLC response of the species from the vulnerability curves, assuming no recovery from embolism. The bottom of each panel indicates the mean ± SD of the water potential measures at each time point during the season.