Literature DB >> 16260750

Modeled regional climate change and California endemic oak ranges.

Lara M Kueppers1, Mark A Snyder, Lisa C Sloan, Erika S Zavaleta, Brian Fulfrost.   

Abstract

In the coming century, anthropogenic climate change will threaten the persistence of restricted endemic species, complicating conservation planning. Although most efforts to quantify potential shifts in species' ranges use global climate model (GCM) output, regional climate model (RCM) output may be better suited to predicting shifts by restricted species, particularly in regions with complex topography or other regionally important climate-forcing factors. Using a RCM-based future climate scenario, we found that potential ranges of two California endemic oaks, Quercus douglasii and Quercus lobata, shrink considerably (to 59% and 54% of modern potential range sizes, respectively) and shift northward. This result is markedly different from that obtained by using a comparable GCM-based scenario, under which these species retain 81% and 73% of their modern potential range sizes, respectively. The difference between RCM- and GCM-based scenarios is due to greater warming and larger precipitation decreases during the growing season predicted by the RCM in these species' potential ranges. Based on the modeled regional climate change, <50% of protected land area currently containing these species is expected to contain them under a future midrange "business-as-usual" path of greenhouse gas emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16260750      PMCID: PMC1283413          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501427102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Extinction risk from climate change.

Authors:  Chris D Thomas; Alison Cameron; Rhys E Green; Michel Bakkenes; Linda J Beaumont; Yvonne C Collingham; Barend F N Erasmus; Marinez Ferreira De Siqueira; Alan Grainger; Lee Hannah; Lesley Hughes; Brian Huntley; Albert S Van Jaarsveld; Guy F Midgley; Lera Miles; Miguel A Ortega-Huerta; A Townsend Peterson; Oliver L Phillips; Stephen E Williams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California.

Authors:  Katharine Hayhoe; Daniel Cayan; Christopher B Field; Peter C Frumhoff; Edwin P Maurer; Norman L Miller; Susanne C Moser; Stephen H Schneider; Kimberly Nicholas Cahill; Elsa E Cleland; Larry Dale; Ray Drapek; R Michael Hanemann; Laurence S Kalkstein; James Lenihan; Claire K Lunch; Ronald P Neilson; Scott C Sheridan; Julia H Verville
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe.

Authors:  Wilfried Thuiller; Sandra Lavorel; Miguel B Araújo; Martin T Sykes; I Colin Prentice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone?

Authors:  V L Sork; F W Davis; P E Smouse; V J Apsit; R J Dyer; J F Fernandez-M; B Kuhn
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.185

  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Climate change and heat-related mortality in six cities Part 2: climate model evaluation and projected impacts from changes in the mean and variability of temperature with climate change.

Authors:  Simon N Gosling; Glenn R McGregor; Jason A Lowe
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Factors affecting stress tolerance in recalcitrant embryonic axes from seeds of four Quercus (Fagaceae) species native to the USA or China.

Authors:  Ke Xia; Lisa M Hill; De-Zhu Li; Christina Walters
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Rainfall facilitates the spread, and time alters the impact, of the invasive Argentine ant.

Authors:  Nicole E Heller; Nathan J Sanders; Jessica Wade Shors; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The roles of dispersal, fecundity, and predation in the population persistence of an oak (Quercus engelmannii) under global change.

Authors:  Erin Conlisk; Dawn Lawson; Alexandra D Syphard; Janet Franklin; Lorraine Flint; Alan Flint; Helen M Regan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Future of endemic flora of biodiversity hotspots in India.

Authors:  Vishwas Sudhir Chitale; Mukund Dev Behera; Partha Sarthi Roy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of elevated pCO2 on metabolic responses of porcelain crab (Petrolisthes cinctipes) Larvae exposed to subsequent salinity stress.

Authors:  Seth H Miller; Sonia Zarate; Edmund H Smith; Brian Gaylord; Jessica D Hosfelt; Tessa M Hill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Morphological adaptations for digging and climate-impacted soil properties define pocket gopher (Thomomys spp.) distributions.

Authors:  Ariel E Marcy; Scott Fendorf; James L Patton; Elizabeth A Hadly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Climate change and the future of California's endemic flora.

Authors:  Scott R Loarie; Benjamin E Carter; Katharine Hayhoe; Sean McMahon; Richard Moe; Charles A Knight; David D Ackerly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Experimental DNA Demethylation Associates with Changes in Growth and Gene Expression of Oak Tree Seedlings.

Authors:  Luke Browne; Alayna Mead; Courtney Horn; Kevin Chang; Zeynep A Celikkol; Claudia L Henriquez; Feiyang Ma; Eric Beraut; Rachel S Meyer; Victoria L Sork
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Two coastal Pacific evergreens, Arbutus menziesii, Pursh. and Quercus agrifolia, Née show little water stress during California's exceptional drought.

Authors:  Alexander I Chacon; Alexander Baer; James K Wheeler; Jarmila Pittermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.