Literature DB >> 32234756

TP53 Mutations Predict Sensitivity to Adjuvant Gemcitabine in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Next-Generation Sequencing Results from the CONKO-001 Trial.

Marianne Sinn1,2, Bruno V Sinn3,4, Denise Treue3,5, Ulrich Keilholz6, Frederik Damm7, Rosa Schmuck8,9, Philipp Lohneis3,10, Frederick Klauschen3,9, Jana K Striefler7, Marcus Bahra8, Hendrik Bläker3, Sven Bischoff7, Uwe Pelzer7, Helmut Oettle11, Hanno Riess7, Jan Budczies3,9,12, Carsten Denkert3,4,13.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the CONKO-001 phase III trial to identify clinically relevant prognostic and predictive mutations and conducted a functional validation in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) sequencing data. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients of the CONKO-001 trial received curatively intended surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine (Gem) or observation only (Obs). Tissue samples of 101 patients were evaluated by NGS of 37 genes. Cox proportional hazard models were applied for survival analysis. In addition, functional genomic analyses were performed in an NGS and RNA-sequencing dataset of 146 pancreatic tumors from TCGA.
RESULTS: The most common mutations in the CONKO cohort were KRAS (75%), TP53 (60%), SMAD4 (10%), CDKNA2 (9%), as well as SWI/SNF (12%) complex alterations. In untreated patients, TP53 mutations were a negative prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS; HR mut vs. WT 2.434, P = 0.005). With respect to gemcitabine treatment, TP53 mutations were a positive predictive factor for gemcitabine efficacy [TP53mut: HR for DFS Gem vs. Obs, 0.235 (0.130 - 0.423; P < 0.001); TP53wt: HR for DFS Gem vs. Obs, 0.794 (0.417 - 1.513; P = 0.483)] with a significant test for interaction (P = 0.003). In the TCGA dataset, TP53 mutations were associated with shortened DFS.
CONCLUSIONS: In CONKO-001, the benefit from adjuvant gemcitabine was confined to the TP53mut patient group. This potentially clinical relevant observation needs to be confirmed in independent prospective studies. The sensitivity of TP53mut PDAC to gemcitabine in CONKO-001 provides a lead for further mechanistic investigations. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32234756     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  11 in total

1.  Circulating TP53 mutations are associated with early tumor progression and poor survival in pancreatic cancer patients treated with FOLFIRINOX.

Authors:  Fleur van der Sijde; Zakia Azmani; Marc G Besselink; Bert A Bonsing; Jan Willem B de Groot; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Brigitte C M Haberkorn; Marjolein Y V Homs; Wilfred F J van IJcken; Quisette P Janssen; Martijn P Lolkema; Saskia A C Luelmo; Leonie J M Mekenkamp; Dana A M Mustafa; Ron H N van Schaik; Johanna W Wilmink; Eveline E Vietsch; Casper H J van Eijck
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  Effect of the p53 P72R Polymorphism on Mutant TP53 Allele Selection in Human Cancer.

Authors:  Cristabelle De Souza; Jill Madden; Devin C Koestler; Dennis Minn; Dennis J Montoya; Kay Minn; Alan G Raetz; Zheng Zhu; Wen-Wu Xiao; Neeki Tahmassebi; Harikumara Reddy; Nina Nelson; Anthony N Karnezis; Jeremy Chien
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Targeted Sequencing of Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas from Patients with Metachronous Pulmonary Metastases.

Authors:  Viktor Hlavac; Beatrice Mohelnikova-Duchonova; Martin Lovecek; Jiri Ehrmann; Veronika Brynychova; Katerina Kolarova; Pavel Soucek
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  circular RNAs 0000515 and 0011385 as potential biomarkers for disease monitoring and determining prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hanqing Wu; Bo Wang; Li Wang; Yinkai Xue
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Genetic Alterations Predict Long-Term Survival in Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head.

Authors:  Sami-Alexander Safi; Lena Haeberle; Wolfgang Goering; Verena Keitel; Georg Fluegen; Nikolas Stoecklein; Alexander Rehders; Wolfram Trudo Knoefel; Irene Esposito
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  The genetic landscape of pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma in China and prognosis stratification.

Authors:  Yefan Yang; Ying Ding; Yuxi Gong; Sha Zhao; Mingna Li; Xiao Li; Guoxin Song; Boya Zhai; Jin Liu; Yang Shao; Liuqing Zhu; Jiaohui Pang; Yutong Ma; Qiuxiang Ou; Xue Wu; Zhihong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  APR-246-The Mutant TP53 Reactivator-Increases the Effectiveness of Berberine and Modified Berberines to Inhibit the Proliferation of Pancreatic Cancer Cells.

Authors:  James Andrew McCubrey; Stephen L Abrams; Linda S Steelman; Lucio Cocco; Stefano Ratti; Alberto M Martelli; Paolo Lombardi; Agnieszka Gizak; Przemysław Duda
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-02-08

Review 8.  Targeting P53 as a Future Strategy to Overcome Gemcitabine Resistance in Biliary Tract Cancers.

Authors:  Chiao-En Wu; Yi-Ru Pan; Chun-Nan Yeh; John Lunec
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-10-23

9.  Pancreatic head vs pancreatic body/tail cancer: Are they different?

Authors:  Kai Sun; Charisma Mylavarapu; Aubrey Crenshaw; Yuqi Zhang; Enshuo Hsu; Jiaqiong Xu; Marilyn Niravath; Stephen L Jones; Adriana Ordonez; Maen Abdelrahim
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-03-15

10.  The Landscape of Genetic Alterations Stratified Prognosis in Oriental Pancreatic Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Shiwei Guo; Xiaohan Shi; Suizhi Gao; Qunxing Hou; Lisha Jiang; Bo Li; Jing Shen; Huan Wang; Shuo Shen; GuoXiao Zhang; Yaqi Pan; Wuchao Liu; Xiongfei Xu; Kailian Zheng; Zhuo Shao; Wei Jing; Ling Lin; Gang Li; Gang Jin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.