Literature DB >> 33555293

Effect of the p53 P72R Polymorphism on Mutant TP53 Allele Selection in Human Cancer.

Cristabelle De Souza1,2,3, Jill Madden4, Devin C Koestler5, Dennis Minn6, Dennis J Montoya1, Kay Minn7, Alan G Raetz1, Zheng Zhu1, Wen-Wu Xiao1, Neeki Tahmassebi1, Harikumara Reddy1, Nina Nelson1, Anthony N Karnezis8, Jeremy Chien1,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: TP53 mutations occur in more than 50% of cancers. We sought to determine the effect of the intragenic P72R single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; rs1042522) on the oncogenic properties of mutant p53.
METHODS: P72R allelic selection in tumors was determined from genotype calls and a Gaussian distributed mixture model. The SNP effect on mutant p53 was determined in p53-negative cancer cell lines. RNA-sequencing, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and survival analysis were performed to describe the SNP effect. All statistical tests were 2-sided.
RESULTS: Among 409 patients with germline heterozygous P72R SNP who harbored somatic mutations in TP53, we observed a selection bias against missense TP53 mutants encoding the P72 SNP (P = 1.64 x 10-13). Exogenously expressed hotspot p53 mutants with the P72 SNP were negatively selected in cancer cells. Gene expression analyses showed the enrichment of p53 pathway genes and inflammatory genes in cancer cells transduced with mutants encoding P72 SNP. Immune gene signature is enriched in patients harboring missense TP53 mutations with homozygous P72 SNP. These patients have improved overall survival as compared with those with the R72 SNP (P = .04).
CONCLUSION: This is the largest study demonstrating a selection against the P72 SNP. Missense p53 mutants with the P72 SNP retain partial wild-type tumor-suppressive functions, which may explain the selection bias against P72 SNP across cancer types. Ovarian cancer patients with the P72 SNP have a better prognosis than with the R72 SNP. Our study describes a previously unknown role through which the rs1042522 SNP modifies tumor suppressor activities of mutant p53 in patients.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33555293      PMCID: PMC8633460          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  43 in total

Review 1.  p53 and human cancer: the first ten thousand mutations.

Authors:  P Hainaut; M Hollstein
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.242

2.  p53 polymorphic variants at codon 72 and the outcome of therapy in randomized breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Pia Wegman; Olle Stal; Marie Stenmark Askmalm; Bo Nordenskjöld; Lars-Erik Rutqvist; Sten Wingren
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Two polymorphic variants of wild-type p53 differ biochemically and biologically.

Authors:  M Thomas; A Kalita; S Labrecque; D Pim; L Banks; G Matlashewski
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  A link between TP53 polymorphisms and metabolism.

Authors:  Che-Pei Kung; Subhasree Basu; Maureen E Murphy
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2016-04-15

5.  TP53 Variations in Human Cancers: New Lessons from the IARC TP53 Database and Genomics Data.

Authors:  Liacine Bouaoun; Dmitriy Sonkin; Maude Ardin; Monica Hollstein; Graham Byrnes; Jiri Zavadil; Magali Olivier
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  TCGA Workflow: Analyze cancer genomics and epigenomics data using Bioconductor packages.

Authors:  Tiago C Silva; Antonio Colaprico; Catharina Olsen; Fulvio D'Angelo; Gianluca Bontempi; Michele Ceccarelli; Houtan Noushmehr
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-06-29

7.  Olaparib-induced Adaptive Response Is Disrupted by FOXM1 Targeting that Enhances Sensitivity to PARP Inhibition.

Authors:  Pingping Fang; Jill A Madden; Lisa Neums; Ryan K Moulder; M Laird Forrest; Jeremy Chien
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.852

8.  iASPP preferentially binds p53 proline-rich region and modulates apoptotic function of codon 72-polymorphic p53.

Authors:  Daniele Bergamaschi; Yardena Samuels; Alexandra Sullivan; Marketa Zvelebil; Hilde Breyssens; Andrea Bisso; Giannino Del Sal; Nelofer Syed; Paul Smith; Milena Gasco; Tim Crook; Xin Lu
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-09-10       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  New functionalities in the TCGAbiolinks package for the study and integration of cancer data from GDC and GTEx.

Authors:  Mohamed Mounir; Marta Lucchetta; Tiago C Silva; Catharina Olsen; Gianluca Bontempi; Xi Chen; Houtan Noushmehr; Antonio Colaprico; Elena Papaleo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  African-centric TP53 variant increases iron accumulation and bacterial pathogenesis but improves response to malaria toxin.

Authors:  Kumar Sachin Singh; Julia I-Ju Leu; Thibaut Barnoud; Prashanthi Vonteddu; Keerthana Gnanapradeepan; Cindy Lin; Qin Liu; James C Barton; Andrew V Kossenkov; Donna L George; Maureen E Murphy; Farokh Dotiwala
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessing Genetic Variants in Matched Biocompartments From Patients With Serous Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Brooke E Sanders; Lisa Ku; Paul Walker; Benjamin G Bitler
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.