Fu-Guo Cai1, Wei Hong1, Yu Ye1, Ye-Song Liu2. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shangrao People's Hospital (Affiliated Shangrao Hospital to Nanchang University), Shangrao, China. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yancheng Third People's Hospital (The Affiliated Yancheng Hospital of Southeast University Medical School), Yancheng, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical removal of the primary lesion is a common treatment for chronic tonsillitis, recurrent tonsillitis, and tonsillar hypertrophy, and is the most widely performed surgery in otorhinolaryngology. With the development and progress of medical science and technology, the methods of tonsillectomy have gradually diversified, and it is of great significance to seek the best tonsillectomy method. This meta-analysis explored the advantages and disadvantages of coblation tonsillectomy (CT) and electrocautery tonsillectomy (ET). METHODS: The keywords "coblation", "radiofrequency ablation", "electrocautery", and "tonsillectomy" were used to search the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the 2 procedures since the establishment of the database were included. After screening and bias risk assessment, a meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 10 articles met the inclusion criteria and entered the final meta-analysis. There were 1,056 participants, including 547 patients who underwent CT and 509 patients who underwent ET. There was no significant difference in the operation time between CT and ET [standard mean difference (SMD) =0.39, 95% CI: -0.35 to 1.13, Z=1.044, P=0.296]. CT resulted in less intraoperative blood loss than ET (SMD =-2.62, 95% CI: -4.83 to -0.41, Z=-2.322, P=0.020). The postoperative pain score of CT was less than ET, but the difference was not statistically significant (SMD =-0.28, 95% CI: -0.58 to 0.01, Z=-1.866, P=0.062). CT resulted in less time to return to normal diet after surgery than ET, and the difference was statistically significant (SMD =-0.36, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.12, Z=-2.918, P=0.004). DISCUSSION: CT resulted in less intraoperative blood loss and faster postoperative recovery than ET, but there was no significant difference in operation time, postoperative pain, and the incidence rate of postoperative complications between the 2 groups. 2022 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Surgical removal of the primary lesion is a common treatment for chronic tonsillitis, recurrent tonsillitis, and tonsillar hypertrophy, and is the most widely performed surgery in otorhinolaryngology. With the development and progress of medical science and technology, the methods of tonsillectomy have gradually diversified, and it is of great significance to seek the best tonsillectomy method. This meta-analysis explored the advantages and disadvantages of coblation tonsillectomy (CT) and electrocautery tonsillectomy (ET). METHODS: The keywords "coblation", "radiofrequency ablation", "electrocautery", and "tonsillectomy" were used to search the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the 2 procedures since the establishment of the database were included. After screening and bias risk assessment, a meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 10 articles met the inclusion criteria and entered the final meta-analysis. There were 1,056 participants, including 547 patients who underwent CT and 509 patients who underwent ET. There was no significant difference in the operation time between CT and ET [standard mean difference (SMD) =0.39, 95% CI: -0.35 to 1.13, Z=1.044, P=0.296]. CT resulted in less intraoperative blood loss than ET (SMD =-2.62, 95% CI: -4.83 to -0.41, Z=-2.322, P=0.020). The postoperative pain score of CT was less than ET, but the difference was not statistically significant (SMD =-0.28, 95% CI: -0.58 to 0.01, Z=-1.866, P=0.062). CT resulted in less time to return to normal diet after surgery than ET, and the difference was statistically significant (SMD =-0.36, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.12, Z=-2.918, P=0.004). DISCUSSION: CT resulted in less intraoperative blood loss and faster postoperative recovery than ET, but there was no significant difference in operation time, postoperative pain, and the incidence rate of postoperative complications between the 2 groups. 2022 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Kelly E Stoker; Debra M Don; D Richard Kang; Michael S Haupert; Anthony Magit; David N Madgy Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.497