| Literature DB >> 28791014 |
Helena Pulido-Olmo1,2, Elena Rodríguez-Sánchez1, José Alberto Navarro-García1, María G Barderas3, Gloria Álvarez-Llamas4, Julián Segura1, Marisol Fernández-Alfonso2, Luis M Ruilope1,5,6, Gema Ruiz-Hurtado1.
Abstract
The protocol describes a novel, rapid, and no-wash one-step immunoassay for highly sensitive and direct detection of the complexes between matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) based on AlphaLISA® technology. We describe two procedures: (i) one approach is used to analyze MMP-9-TIMP-1 interactions using recombinant human MMP-9 with its corresponding recombinant human TIMP-1 inhibitor and (ii) the second approach is used to analyze native or endogenous MMP-9-TIMP-1 protein interactions in samples of human plasma. Evaluating native MMP-9-TIMP-1 complexes using this approach avoids the use of indirect calculations of the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio for which independent MMP-9 and TIMP-1 quantifications by two conventional ELISAs are needed. The MMP-9-TIMP-1 AlphaLISA® assay is quick, highly simplified, and cost-effective and can be completed in less than 3 h. Moreover, the assay has great potential for use in basic and preclinical research as it allows direct determination of native MMP-9-TIMP-1 complexes in circulating blood as biofluid.Entities:
Keywords: AlphaLISA®; immunoassay; matrix metalloproteinase-9; protein interaction; tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1
Year: 2017 PMID: 28791014 PMCID: PMC5523156 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Troubleshooting guide.
| Step | Problem | Possible reason | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3, 15, 18 | Low number of acceptor or donor beads in wells | Poor bead suspension | Mix the stock bead suspension gently, avoid foaming when vortexing bead solutions before use |
| 13 | Deteriorated stored AlphaLISA® acceptor beads | Storage of AlphaLISA® acceptor beads longer than 6 months or incorrectly stored | Conjugated acceptor beads must be properly stored at 4°C in an opaque vial, carefully closed to avoid degradation or evaporation. Do not store conjugated acceptor beads longer than 6 months |
| 14, 17, 18 | Lower signal than expected | Low incubation temperature | Component binding is optimal at 20–25°C, check lab temperature to ensure that it is within this range |
| Short incubation time | Ensure correct incubation time | ||
| High degree of signal variability | Uneven well evaporation | Use a top cover plate during incubations | |
| Air bubbles in some wells | Use electronic pipettes, avoid foam when vortexing bead solutions before use | ||
| 14A | Hook effect | The bead system (donor and acceptor beads) have become to be saturated when the maximum binding capacity is reached and an excess of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 or tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 is able to dissociate the interaction between the two beads provoking a decreased RLU signal | The hook point in our assay is reached at 300 ng/mL MMP-9 and TIMP-1. Since the hook effect is a common intrinsic phenomenon present in any no-wash sandwich-type assay as this, we recommend to use MMP-9 and TIMP-1 concentration below this hook point |
| 14 B | Signal intensity is very high | Concentration of MMP-9–TIMP-1 complexes of the sample is too high | Dilute samples |
| No signal, lower signal than expected or high background signal | Contamination or deterioration of assay buffer | Prepare fresh assay buffer before use | |
| 14, 15, 16, 18 | High degree of signal variability | Mixing problems | Gently tap the plate against a hard surface to ensure all reagents are at the bottom of the well |
| 18 | No signal or lower signal than expected | Donor beads have been exposed to light | Use non-light exposed beads. Always protect beads from light |
| High background signal | Donor beads have been exposed to light | During incubation, use a black top cover or place the plate in a drawer | |
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the conjugation protocol between the AlphaLISA® acceptor bead and the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 antibody. Once the acceptor beads and the MMP-9 antibody are coupled, it is important to block free acceptor bead-binding sites to avoid further interactions with other antibodies. One conjugation between 1 mg AlphaLISA® acceptor beads and 0.1 mg MMP-9 antibody reaches for a total 2,000 different interaction assays during 12 months.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of AlphaLISA® protein interaction determination protocol using recombinant matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 proteins or endogenous MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in human plasma. MMP-9 and TIMP-1 recombinant proteins need 1 h incubation at room temperature to promote the interaction. The subsequent step consists of the incubation of the sample or the recombinant proteins with the conjugated acceptor beads and the biotinylated anti-TIMP-1 antibody for an additional 1 h. Finally, after the incubation of the mixture with the donor beads for 30 min, the plaque should be read at 680 nm.
Overview of how to prepare working solutions of recombinant matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 for AlphaLISA® immunoassay interaction.
| Working solutions (ng/mL) | Recombinant TIMP-1 (rTIMP-1) | Recombinant MMP-9 (rMMP-9) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rTIMP-1 (μL) | Buffer (μL) | rMMP-9 (μL) | Buffer (μL) | |
| 10,000 | 0.4 µL of 1 mg/mL stock solution | 39.6 | 4 µL of 0.1 mg/mL stock solution | 36 |
| 3,000 | 40 µL of 0.003 mg/mL intermediate stock solution | 0 | 1.2 µL of 0.1 mg/mL stock solution | 38.8 |
| 1,000 | 13.3 µL of 0.003 mg/mL intermediate solution | 26.7 | 4 µL of 10,000 ng/mL working solution | 36 |
| 300 | 4 µL of 0.003 mg/mL intermediate solution | 36 | 4 µL of 3,000 ng/mL of working solution | 36 |
| 0 | 0 µL | 40 | 0 μL | 40 |
Figure 3Principle of the AlphaLISA® matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9–tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 interaction immunoassay.
Figure 4AlphaLISA® matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9–tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 interaction immunoassay for detecting recombinant MMP-9 (rMMP-9) and TIMP-1 proteins. (A) Schematic illustration of the cross-titration MMP-9–TIMP-1 template. MMP-9 and TIMP-1 concentrations from 0 to 1,000 ng/mL were used for the optimization of the technique. (B) Results of the rMMP-9–TIMP-1 interaction immunoassay expressed as binding RLU (relative luminescence units) using different concentrations of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 (0, 30, 100, 300, and 1,000 ng/mL). (C) Curve 0–1,000 ng/mL of MMP-9 with a fixed dose of 300 ng/mL TIMP-1. (D) Curve 0–1,000 ng/mL of TIMP-1 with a fixed dose of 300 ng/mL MMP-9. (C,D) assays were repeated twice. Hook point is reached at 300 ng/mL MMP-9 and 300 ng/mL TIMP-1.
Figure 5Comparison between specific matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9–tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 interactions determined by AlphaLISA® immunoassay and MMP-9, TIMP-1, and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio levels estimated by classical ELISAs in human plasma samples from hypertensive patients with normoalbuminuria versus albuminuria. (A) AlphaLISA® MMP-9–TIMP-1 interaction immunoassay expressed as binding RLU (relative luminescence units) in normoalbuminuric (n = 16) and albuminuric (n = 20) patients. (B) Receiver-operating characteristics curve for AlphaLISA® MMP-9–TIMP-1 immunoassay (AUC = 0.778, 95% CI 0.63–0.93). This curve was used for comparing the ability of the AlphaLISA® MMP-9–TIMP-1 immunoassay to predict albuminuria in hypertensive patients. AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval. (C) MMP-9 and (D) TIMP-1 levels quantified by standard ELISAs. (E) MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio estimation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus albuminuric patients. (F) Gelatinase MMP-9 activity in human plasma, upper panel, representative gelatin zymography gel, bottom panel, densitometric analysis expressed as % of change versus normoalbuminuria. In panels (A,C,D,E), results are expressed as median values (horizontal line) and the interquartile ranges (box). In panel (F), results are expressed in bar graph as mean values ± SEM.