Literature DB >> 23548942

In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial.

Eric J Forman1, Kathleen H Hong, Kathleen M Ferry, Xin Tao, Deanne Taylor, Brynn Levy, Nathan R Treff, Richard T Scott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether performing comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) and transferring a single euploid blastocyst can result in an ongoing pregnancy rate that is equivalent to transferring two untested blastocysts while reducing the risk of multiple gestation.
DESIGN: Randomized, noninferiority trial.
SETTING: Academic center for reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S): Infertile couples (n = 205) with a female partner less than 43 years old having a serum anti-Müllerian hormone level ≥ 1.2 ng/mL and day 3 FSH <12 IU/L. INTERVENTION(S): Randomization occurred when at least two blastocysts were suitable for trophectoderm biopsy. The study group (n = 89) had all viable blastocysts biopsied for real-time, polymerase chain reaction-based CCS and single euploid blastocyst transfer. The control group (n = 86) had their two best-quality, untested blastocysts transferred. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The ongoing pregnancy rate to ≥ 24 weeks (primary outcome) and the multiple gestation rate. RESULT(S): The ongoing pregnancy rate per randomized patient after the first ET was similar between groups (60.7% after single euploid blastocyst transfer vs. 65.1% after untested two-blastocyst transfer; relative risk [RR], 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-1.2). A difference of greater than 20% in favor of two-blastocyst transfer was excluded. The risk of multiple gestation was reduced after single euploid blastocyst transfer (53.4% to 0%), and patients were nearly twice as likely to have an ongoing singleton pregnancy (60.7% vs. 33.7%; RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5). CONCLUSION(S): In women ≤ 42 years old, transferring a single euploid blastocyst results in ongoing pregnancy rates that are the same as transferring two untested blastocysts while dramatically reducing the risk of twins.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23548942     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  123 in total

1.  A greater number of euploid blastocysts in a given cohort predicts excellent outcomes in single embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Scott Morin; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David McCulloh; Jamie Grifo; Santiago Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Cumulus-corona gene expression analysis combined with morphological embryo scoring in single embryo transfer cycles increases live birth after fresh transfer and decreases time to pregnancy.

Authors:  T Adriaenssens; I Van Vaerenbergh; W Coucke; I Segers; G Verheyen; E Anckaert; M De Vos; J Smitz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Morphokinetic Evaluation of Embryo Development in a Mouse Model: Functional and Molecular Correlates.

Authors:  Rachel Weinerman; Rui Feng; Teri S Ord; Richard M Schultz; Marisa S Bartolomei; Christos Coutifaris; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Genotyping single-sperm cells by universal MARSALA enables the acquisition of linkage information for combined pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and genome screening.

Authors:  Haitao Wu; Xiaoting Shen; Lei Huang; Yanhong Zeng; Yumei Gao; Lin Shao; Baomin Lu; Yiping Zhong; Benyu Miao; Yanwen Xu; Yali Wang; Yubin Li; Luoxing Xiong; Sijia Lu; X Sunney Xie; Canquan Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Pregnancy rates after pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy are only superior when trophectoderm biopsy is performed on hatching embryos.

Authors:  Sonali Singh; Elie Hobeika; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Genetics and Epigenetics of Infertility and Treatments on Outcomes.

Authors:  Margareta D Pisarska; Jessica L Chan; Kate Lawrenson; Tania L Gonzalez; Erica T Wang
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Re-analysis of aneuploidy blastocysts with an inner cell mass and different regional trophectoderm cells.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Liying Yan; Sijia Lu; Nan Zhao; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Euploidy in relation to blastocyst sex and morphology.

Authors:  Ange Wang; Jonathan Kort; Barry Behr; Lynn M Westphal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Assessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal?

Authors:  Yael G Kramer; Jason D Kofinas; Katherine Melzer; Nicole Noyes; Caroline McCaffrey; Julia Buldo-Licciardi; David H McCulloh; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.