| Literature DB >> 32218311 |
Igor G Morgunov1, Svetlana V Kamzolova1, Olga V Karpukhina2, Svetlana B Bokieva3, Julia N Lunina1, Anatoly N Inozemtsev2.
Abstract
Within this work, the microbial synthesis of (2R,3S)-isocitric acid (ICA), a metabolite of the nonconventional yeast Yarrowia lipolytica, from biodiesel waste, has been studied. The selected strain Y. lipolytica VKM Y-2373 synthesized ICA with citric acid (CA) as a byproduct. This process can be regulated by changing cultivation conditions. The maximal production of ICA with the minimal formation of the byproduct was provided by the use of a concentration of (NH4)2SO4 (6 g/L); the addition of biodiesel waste to cultivation medium in 20-60 g/L portions; maintaining the pH of the cultivation medium at 6, and degree of aeration between 25% and 60% of saturation. Itaconic acid at a concentration of 15 mM favorably influenced the production of ICA by the selected strain. The optimization of cultivation conditions allowed us to increase the concentration of ICA in the culture liquid from 58.32 to 90.2 g/L, the product yield (Y) by 40%, and the ICA/CA ratio from 1.1:1 to 3:1. Research on laboratory animals indicated that ICA counteracted the negative effect of ammonium molybdate (10-5 М) and lead diacetate (10-7 М) on the learning and spatial memory of rats, including those exposed to emotional stress.Entities:
Keywords: (2R,3S)-isocitric acid; Yarrowia lipolytica; biodiesel waste; heavy metals; learning; memory; optimization; rats; stress
Year: 2020 PMID: 32218311 PMCID: PMC7232500 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8040462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Parameters of growth and (2R,3S)-isocitric acid (ICA) production by Y. lipolytica strains.
| Parameter |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| VKM Y-2373 | UV/NNG | ||
| Biomass (g/L) | 12.67 ± 1.15 | 8.10 ± 1.75 | 9.00 ±1.15 |
| ICA (g/L) | 58.32 ± 4.45 | 44.60 ± 2.15 | 33.60 ± 4.22 |
| CA (g/L) | 53.02 ± 4.15 | 34.31 ± 3.75 | 28.00 ± 2.10 |
| ICA/CA ratio | 1.1:1 | 1.3:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Other acids (% of the sum) | 3.35 | 10.00 | 4.65 |
| Total amount of ICA ( | 446.15 | 309.52 | 302.40 |
| Glycerol + Fatty acids consumed ( | 563.33 | 586.24 | 461.89 |
| Y (g/g) | 0.79 | 0.53 | 0.65 |
| Q (g/L·h) | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.42 |
Effect of nitrogen concentration on the growth of Y. lipolytica VKM Y-2373 and ICA production.
| Parameter | Concentration of (NH4)2SO4 (g/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 10.0 | |
| Biomass (g/L) | 5.87 ± 1.00 | 12.67 ± 1.15 | 18.75 ± 2.15 | 32.67 ± 1.15 |
| ICA (g/L) | 13.3 ± 1.45 | 58.32 ± 3.45 | 70.22 ± 2.45 | 28.15 ± 3.45 |
| CA (g/L) | 13.1 ± 1.15 | 53.02 ± 2.15 | 46.81 ± 2.85 | 23.02 ± 2.15 |
| ICA/CA ratio | 1:1 | 1.1:1 | 1.5:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Total amount of ICA ( | 97.36 | 446.15 | 539.99 | 251.94 |
| Glycerol + Fatty acids consumed ( | 177.00 | 563.33 | 635.28 | 434.38 |
| Y (g/g) | 0.55 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.58 |
| Q (g/L·h) | 0.14 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.35 |
Effect of the initial concentration of biodiesel waste on growth and ICA production by Y. lipolytica VKM Y-2373.
| Parameter | Concentration of Biodiesel Waste (g/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 100 | 150 | |
| Biomass (g/L) | 18.75 ±2.15 | 18.30 ±3.10 | 17.40 ± 2.10 | 16.80 ± 1.10 | 12.90 ± 2.10 | 10.90 ± 3.14 |
| Glycerol uptake rate (g/L·h) | 0.74 ± 0.40 | 0.74 ± 0.40 | 0.74± 0.40 | 0.70 ± 0.26 | 0.560± 0,20 | 0.35 ± 0,15 |
| Fatty acids uptake (g/L·h) | 0.22 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.03 |
| ICA (g/L) | 70.22 ± 2.45 | 80.12 ± 2.00 | 78.20 ± 2.20 | 76.65 ± 3.40 | 32.65 ± 6.12 | 17.65 ± 2.12 |
| CA (g/L) | 46.81 ± 2.85 | 41.00 ± 3.12 | 39.00 ± 2.12 | 37.65 ± 3.12 | 31.00 ± 5.40 | 16.65 ± 2.40 |
| ICA/CA ratio | 1.5:1 | 2:1 | 2:1 | 2:1 | 1.1:1 | 1.1:1 |
| Total amount of ICA ( | 539.99 | 597.60 | 583.20 | 576.00 | 230.40 | 122.40 |
| Glycerol + Fatty acids consumed ( | 635.28 | 602.05 | 593.86 | 606.08 | 419.59 | 222.90 |
| Y (g/g) | 0.85 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.55 | 0.55 |
| Q (g/L·h) | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.32 | 0.17 |
Effect of pH on growth and ICA production by Y. lipolytica VKM Y-2373.
| Parameter | pH | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | |
| Biomass (g/L) | 20.0 ± 2.65 | 19.0 ± 3.53 | 21.0 ± 2.25 | 18.30 ± 3.10 | 16.30 ± 2.80 | 14.00 ± 2.65 |
| ICA (g/L) | 20.8 ± 3.85 | 42.4 ± 3.15 | 40.4 ± 3.85 | 80.12 ± 2.00 | 76.3 ± 3.40 | 40.73 ± 2.00 |
| CA (g/L) | 34.7 ± 3.45 | 60.8 ± 3.89 | 67.7 ± 3.45 | 41.00 ± 3.12 | 30.5 ± 2.15 | 26.00 ± 3.12 |
| ICA/CA ratio | 0.6:1 | 0.7:1 | 0.6:1 | 2:1 | 2.5:1 | 2.2:1 |
| Total amount of ICA ( | 180.00 | 338.40 | 316.80 | 597.60 | 597.60 | 360.00 |
| Glycerol + Fatty acids consumed ( | 692.00 | 676.00 | 597.00 | 602.05 | 649.56 | 654.00 |
| Y (g/g) | 0.26 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.54 |
| Q (g/L·h) | 0.25 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.50 |
Effect of itaconic acid on growth and ICA production by Y. lipolytica VKM Y-2373.
| Parameter | Itaconic Acid (mM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 15 | 30 | 60 | 100 | |
| Biomass (g/L) | 18.30 ± 3.10 | 19.25 ± 2.10 | 17.70 ± 1.75 | 16.45 ± 1.10 | 11.45 ± 3.20 |
| ICA (g/L) | 80.12 ± 2.00 | 90.2 ± 1.10 | 84.1 ± 2.00 | 68.75 ± 2.00 | 40.0 ± 3.65 |
| CA (g/L) | 41.00 ± 3.12 | 29.6 ± 1.10 | 27.8 ± 1.70 | 20.8 ± 2.70 | 12.5 ± 0.65 |
| ICA/CA ratio | 2:1 | 3:1 | 3:1 | 3.3:1 | 3.2:1 |
| Total amount of ICA ( | 597.60 | 648.00 | 576.00 | 511.20 | 273.60 |
| Glycerol + Fatty acids consumed (S) (g) | 602.05 | 584.43 | 586.53 | 620.65 | 588.86 |
| Y (g/g) | 0.94 | 1.11 | 0.98 | 0.82 | 0.46 |
| Q (g/L·h) | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.38 |
| Enzyme activity (U/mg protein) | |||||
| Citrate synthase | 2.910 | 2.800 | 2.750 | 2.350 | 2.10 |
| Aconitate hydratase | 0.805 | 0.830 | 0.730 | 0.730 | 0.630 |
| NAD-ICDH | 0.060 | 0.064 | 0.031 | 0.022 | 0.020 |
| Isocitrate lyase | 0.081 | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Effect of aeration on growth and ICA production by Y. lipolytica VKM Y-2373.
| Parameter | Without Fe2+ | With Fe2+ = 1.2 mg/L | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pO2 (% Saturation) | pO2 (% Saturation) | |||||
| 5–10 | 25–30 | 55–60 | 5–10 | 25–30 | 55–60 | |
| Biomass (g/L) | 3.50 ± 1.10 | 15.00 ± 1.10 | 19.25 ± 2.10 | 11.50 ± 1.10 | 16.25 ± 1.10 | 17.55 ± 1.55 |
| ICA (g/L) | 8.42 ± 2.50 | 72.22 ± 1.50 | 90.2 ± 1.10 | 24.00 ± 3.50 | 80.4 ± 4.10 | 85.72 ± 4.35 |
| CA (g/L) | 6.25 ± 14.00 | 24.44 ± 2.00 | 29.6 ± 1.10 | 8.10 ± 1.00 | 26.8 ± 1.10 | 28.6 ± 2.10 |
| ICA/CA ratio | 1.3:1 | 3:1 | 3:1 | 3:1 | 3:1 | 3:1 |
| Total amount of ICA (P) (g) | 72.00 | 475.20 | 648.00 | 168.00 | 604.8 | 604.8 |
| Glycerol + Fatty acids consumed (S) (g) | 681.84 | 529.43 | 584.43 | 636.38 | 615.86 | 572.75 |
| Y (g/g) | 0.11 | 0.89 | 1.11 | 0.26 | 0.98 | 1.06 |
| Q (g/L·h) | 0.10 | 0.66 | 0.90 | 0.23 | 0.84 | 0.84 |
Experimental sequence.
| Days | 1–4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Process | Formation of the CAAR | CAAR smash | CAAR restoration | Spatial transformation of the CAAR |
Effect of ICA and heavy metal salts on the conditioned active avoidance response (CAAR) (% of the number of trials) before and after its spatial transformation.
| Variant | Before | After | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21–25 | 1–5 | 6–10 | 11–15 | 16–20 | |
| Control | 100 * | 60 ± 29.6 | 70 ± 17.3 | 70 ± 17.3 | 94 ± 6.3 |
| ICA | 94 ± 13.5 * | 78 ± 14.8 a | 92 ± 10.3 a | 94 ± 9.7 a | 100 |
| ICA + Pb | 86 ± 16.5 | 80 ± 24.9 | 82 ± 14.8 | 94 ± 9.7 | 80 ± 18.7 |
| Mo | 68 ± 10.4 a | 75 ± 27.8 | 65 ± 20.7 | 73 ± 21.2 | 88 ± 14.9 |
| ICA+Mo | 95 ± 9.3 b | 90 ± 14.1 c | 98 ± 6.3 a,b | 88 ± 21.5 a,b | 100 b |
Data are the mean and standard deviations of 5 trials. * p < 0.05 relative the values after spatial transformation; a p < 0.05 relative the control; b relative the values with Mo; c p < 0.05 relative the values with ICA.