| Literature DB >> 32218284 |
Jincen Xiao1, Jih-Yu Mao1, Sihao Huang2, Tao Qing1.
Abstract
Employee green behavior has received considerable attention in recent years because of its contribution to an organization's environmental performance. However, little is known about how personal and organizational factors can simultaneously affect employee voluntary green behavior. The present study draws on person-environment fit theory to investigate how and when employee voluntary green behavior can be facilitated by employee-organization fit. Based on a time-lagged survey study of 413 employees from three different manufactures of chemical products, the present study discovers a positive relationship between employee-organization fit and employee voluntary green behavior, and this relationship is mediated by perceived insider status. Moreover, the relationship between perceived insider status and voluntary green behavior is strengthened when employees perceive a green organizational climate. Insights for theory, practice, and future research are also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: cross-level moderated mediation; green organizational climate; perceived insider status; person-environment fit theory; voluntary green behavior
Year: 2020 PMID: 32218284 PMCID: PMC7177816 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The proposed model of current research. Note: T1 means the data were collected at Time 1, T2 means the data were collected at Time 2.
Measurement model fit results.
| Models |
|
| RMSEA | CFI | TLI | SRMR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesized 4-factor model | 328.81 | 164 | — | 0.05 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.01 |
| Alternative 3-factor model | 402.08 | 167 | 73.27 *** (3) | 0.06 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.01 |
| Alternative 3-factor model | 469.92 | 167 | 141.11 *** (3) | 0.07 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.01 |
| Alternative 3-factor model | 537.96 | 167 | 209.15 *** (3) | 0.07 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.01 |
| Alternative 2-factor model | 602.30 | 169 | 273.22 *** (5) | 0.08 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.01 |
| Alternative 2-factor model | 616.15 | 169 | 287.34 *** (5) | 0.08 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.01 |
| Alternative 1-factor model | 711.61 | 170 | 382.80 *** (6) | 0.09 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.01 |
Notes: N = 413. EOF = employee-organization fit; PIS = perceived insider status; GOC = green organizational climate; VGB = voluntary green behavior; χ = chi-square; df = degrees of freedom; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual. All models are compared with the hypothesized 4-factor model. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2The graphical representation of the measurement model for the hypothesized 4-factor model. Notes: f1 = employee-organization fit; f2 = perceived insider status; f3 = green organizational climate; f4 = voluntary green behavior. Values in parentheses are standard error estimates.
Means, standard deviations, correlations, and reliabilities of studied variables.
| Variables | Mean |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.62 | 0.49 | — | ||||||||
|
| 35.72 | 9.45 | −0.04 | — | |||||||
|
| 1.83 | 0.72 | 0.05 | −0.35 *** | — | ||||||
|
| 11.22 | 8.99 | −0.02 | 0.86 *** | −0.36 *** | — | |||||
|
| 3.90 | 0.71 | 0.01 | 0.15 ** | 0.04 | 0.12 * | (0.86) | ||||
|
| 4.20 | 0.82 | 0.04 | 0.14 ** | 0.05 | 0.10 * | 0.46 *** | (0.91) | |||
|
| 4.24 | 0.77 | 0.12* | 0.17 *** | 0.03 | 0.21 *** | 0.11 * | 0.32 *** | (0.76) | ||
|
| 4.17 | 0.89 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.22 *** | 0.42 *** | 0.27 *** | (0.91) | |
|
| 4.38 | 0.75 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.24 *** | 0.28 *** | 0.38 *** | 0.28 *** | (0.88) |
Notes: N = 413. SD = standard deviation. Cronbach’s α are presented along the diagonal. Gender: 1 = female; 2 = male. Education: 1 = junior college or below; 2 = bachelor; 3 = postgraduate. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Mplus path analysis results.
| Variables | Main Effect | Mediation Effect | Moderation Effect | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voluntary Green Behavior | Perceived Insider Status | Voluntary Green Behavior | Voluntary Green Behavior | |
|
| 3.84 *** (0.15) | 3.97 *** (0.21) | 2.56 *** (0.23) | 3.94*** (0.18) |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.05 (0.08) | 0.17 ** (.06) | -0.01 (0.06) | −0.03 (0.08) |
|
| −0.01 *** (0.00) | −0.01 (0.01) | -0.01 ** (0.00) | −0.01 ** (0.00) |
|
| 0.05 (0.08) | 0.10 * (0.05) | 0.01 (0.09) | 0.01 (0.10) |
|
| 0.01 (0.01) | 0.02 *** (0.01) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.01) |
|
| 0.16 * (0.10) | −0.07 *** (0.02) | 0.18 * (0.10) | 0.18 (0.09) |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.20 ** (0.07) | 0.30 *** (0.03) | 0.10 (0.05) | 0.09 (0.06) |
|
| 0.33 *** (0.03) | 0.33 *** (0.03) | ||
|
| 0.12 * (0.06) | |||
|
| ||||
|
| 0.17 *** (0.02) | |||
|
| (0.08, 0.12) | |||
Notes: N = 413. Unstandardized coefficient estimates are reported. Values in parentheses are standard error estimates. Gender: 1 = female; 2 = male. Education: 1 = junior college or below; 2 = bachelor; 3 = postgraduate. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3The interactive effect of perceived insider status and green organizational climate on voluntary green behavior.
First-stage, second-stage, and conditional indirect effect results.
| Outcome | Moderator | Stage | Effect | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green Organizational Climate | First ( | Second ( | Indirect ( | 95% CI of Indirect Effect | |
| Voluntary green behavior | High (+1 | 0.30 *** (0.03) | 0.41 *** (0.03) | 0.12 *** (0.01) | (0.10, 0.15) |
| Low (−1 | 0.30 *** (0.03) | 0.25 *** (0.03) | 0.08 *** (0.01) | (0.05, 0.10) | |
| Difference | — | 0.16 *** (0.02) | 0.05 *** (0.003) | (0.04, 0.06) | |
Notes: N = 413. SD = standard deviation. Values in parentheses are standard error estimates. Pmx = path from employee-organization fit to perceived insider status; Pym = path from perceived insider status to voluntary green behavior. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are derived from the Monte Carlo simulation (with 20,000 sample repetitions) using an online utility [71]. *** p < 0.001.
Measurement Items.
| Variables | Items |
|---|---|
| Employee-Organization Fit | 1. The things that I value in life are very similar to the things that my organization values. |
| 2. My personal values match my organization’s values and culture. | |
| 3. My organization’s values and culture provide a good fit with the things that I value in life. | |
| Perceived Insider Status | 1. I feel very much a part of my work organization. |
| 2. My work organization makes me believe that I am included in it. | |
| 3. I feel like I am an ‘outsider’ at this organization (R). | |
| 4. I don’t feel included in this organization (R). | |
| 5. I feel I am an ‘insider’ in my work organization. | |
| 6. My work organization makes me frequently feel ‘left-out’ (R). | |
| Green Organizational Climate | The extent to which your company is: |
| 1. Worried about its environmental impact. | |
| 2. Interested in supporting environmental causes. | |
| 3. Believes it is important to protect the environment. | |
| 4. Concerned with becoming more environmentally friendly. | |
| 5. Would like to be seen as environmentally friendly. | |
| Voluntary Green Behavior | Thinking about your work, to what extent do you…? |
| 1. Avoid unnecessary printing to save papers. | |
| 2. Use personal cups instead of disposable cups. | |
| 3. Use stairs instead of elevators when going from floor to floor in the building. | |
| 4. Reuse papers to take notes in the office. | |
| 5. Recycle reusable things in the workplace. | |
| 6. Sort recyclable materials into their appropriate bins when other group members do not recycle them. | |
| Environmental Attitude | 1. It is still the case that the major part of the population does not act in an environmentally conscious way. |
| 2. There are limits to economic growth which our industrialized world has crossed or will reach very soon. | |
| 3. Environmental-protection measures should be carried out even if this reduces the number of jobs in the economy. | |
| 4. Thinking about the environmental conditions our children and grandchildren have to live under, worries me. | |
| 5. When I read newspaper articles about environmental problems or view such TV-reports, I am indignant and angry. | |
| 6. If we continue as before, we are approaching an environmental catastrophe. | |
| 7. It is still true that politicians do far too little for environmental protection. | |
| 8. For the benefit of the environment we should be prepared to restrict our momentary style of living |
Notes: R in the parentheses means reverse code for that item.