| Literature DB >> 35983147 |
Yabin Yu1,2, Hua Cheng1, Qian Xu2.
Abstract
At a new stage of "carbon peak" and "carbon neutral," we need to strengthen the internal impetus of institutions and policies to promote ecological civilization construction. The initiative implementation of voluntary environmental behavior (VEB) is an effective way for enterprises to achieve high quality sustainable development. The VEB of enterprises include but are not limited to compliance with voluntary environmental regulations (VER). Different from the existing literature on enterprise VER, most of which are just the verification of ISO14001, the study conducts a comprehensive exploratory research on the theoretical framework of what is driving the VEB of Chinese textile enterprises. First, based on grounded theory, the paper coded the hand-collected environmental text information of Chinese listed textile enterprises from 2004 to 2018 and constructed a complete theoretical analysis framework from motivation to performance evaluation of enterprise VEB. Second, PSM method is taken to verify the conceptual model. As a result, we find the following: (1) in addition to ISO14001, the textile enterprises involve many industry-specific VER. (2) The VEB and VER of Chinese textile enterprises promote each other. (3) Either following VER or implementing VEB can effectively increase the innovation input and then actively improve the innovation quality of Chinese textile enterprises. In this way, the conclusion not only provides analysis ideas for future empirical research, but also offers practical suggestions to Chinese textile enterprises and policy makers for environmental management.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35983147 PMCID: PMC9381237 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9736667
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Number of texts by subindustry.
Figure 2Number of contents by subindustry.
Figure 3Number of texts by ownership.
Figure 4Number of contents by ownership.
Figure 5Number of texts by region.
Figure 6Number of contents by region.
Open coding.
| No. | Category | Example of original material | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Environmental policy | The company earnestly practices the development concept that “lucid waters and lush mountains are golden mountains and silver mountains” | NO.12 |
| 2 | Position in industry | The very few enterprises in the spandex industry can produce this kind of products | NO.14 |
| 3 | Honor | Awarded as “regional green enterprise,” “Henan green enterprise,” and other honorary titles | NO.3 |
| 4 | Development strategy | Combine the company's development strategy with corporate social responsibility, and combine the development planning and practice of social responsibility with the company's own development goals | NO.6 |
| 5 | Quality requirement | We have developed the treatment technology with independent patent, invested more than 110 million yuan, and implemented a number of technical transformation projects, so that the exhaust emission of the process is far below the national standard | NO.4 |
| 6 | Regulation | Establish and improve emergency response plans for environmental emergencies, and formulate environmental self-monitoring plans | NO.1 |
| 7 | Organizational structure | The top management assumes the responsibility for environmental protection and sets up green positions to implement green management of the enterprise | NO.2 |
| 8 | Capital | Investment in environmental protection has increased year by year | NO.23 |
| 9 | Technology | Research and develop technology on new environmental protection and energy saving, such as half-tank dyeing, reclaimed water reuse, and so on | NO.7 |
| 10 | Supply chain | The company preferentially selects the dye and auxiliary suppliers that have passed the European environmental protection certification | NO.8 |
| 11 | Standard | Voluntary product certification: STANDARD100byOEKO-TEX; | NO.21 |
| 12 | Cleaner production | Adhere to the environmental policy of “environmental factory, compliance, full participation, cleaner production, pollution reduction and efficiency, sustainable development” | NO.18 |
| 13 | Environment protection | Production of safe and healthy textile products, leading the positive energy of environmental protection and sustainable development | NO.13 |
| 14 | Transformation and upgrading | The company actively plays the role of a platform for scientific and technological innovation, stimulates the intelligence of scientific researchers, and promotes the industrial transformation and upgrading of the company | NO.4 |
| 15 | Sustainable development | The company continues to deepen the concept of sustainable development within the enterprise and actively integrates environmental responsibility and social responsibility into the internal management system of the enterprise | NO.9 |
| 16 | Circular economy | We will continue to promote clean production and a circular economy and strive to improve the comprehensive utilization of resources | NO.11 |
Axial coding.
| No. | Main category | Open category | Category connotation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | External factor | Environmental policy | Environmental policy is an important external factor that drives enterprises to carry out VEB |
| Position in industry | Companies are also more motivated to be proactive about environmental behavior if they are in a leading position in the industry | ||
|
| |||
| 2 | Internal factor | Honor | The honor that an enterprise can obtain in the field of environmental protection also promotes its VEB |
| Development strategy | If environmental protection is regarded as an important aspect of corporate strategy, VEB is an important way to implement the strategy | ||
| Quality requirement | The quality requirements of enterprises will drive enterprises not only to meet the minimum environmental requirements, but also to constantly improve | ||
|
| |||
| 3 | VEB | Regulation | By establishing internal environmental protection regulations, the VEB are regulated |
| Organizational structure | Ensure the effective implementation of VEB by establishing environmental protection departments (e.g., environmental protection committee) within the enterprise | ||
| Capital | Continuously increase the investment in environmental protection to ensure that VEB get sufficient financial support | ||
| Technology | A series of technical transformation projects such as reclaimed water reuse and half-cylinder dyeing are adopted to improve the environmental protection capability of enterprises | ||
| Supply chain | When selecting suppliers, enterprises will consider whether the supplier has environmental protection certification or the products have environmental protection | ||
|
| |||
| 4 | VER | Environmental management certification | ISO14001 |
| Product certification | GRS 4.0 RVA, STANDARD100byOEKO-TEX, FSC-STD-40-004 V3-0, T/CCFA 02007-2008 | ||
|
| |||
| 5 | Performance | Whether VEB of enterprises meets the expectations or needs to be measured by environmental performance | |
| Direct | Cleaner production | For manufacturing textile enterprises, cleaner production is the first step to connect VEB with green performance | |
| Environment protection | Environmental protection is the direct target of enterprises' VEB | ||
| Transformation and upgrading | As a traditional manufacturing industry, constantly adapting to the development of the times, the pursuit of transformation and upgrading is also one of the ultimate goals | ||
| Indirect | Sustainable development | Green development is sustainable, and VEB of enterprises can help them achieve sustainable development | |
| Circular economy | With increasingly scarce resources, enterprises through VEB can achieve energy saving and consumption reduction of circular economy | ||
Selective coding.
| Relational structure | Connotation of relational structure |
|---|---|
| Motivation (External/Internal) ⟶ VEB/VER | Internal and external factors such as policy, position in industry, honor, development strategy, and quality requirements are all important factors influencing the implementation of VEB and compliance with VER |
| VEB ⟶ VER/VER ⟶ VEB | Enterprises' implementation of VEB and compliance with VER are mutually reinforcing. Enterprises with active implementation of VEB are more willing to comply with VER (such as voluntary environmental product certification). Companies that have followed VER (such as ISO14001) will be more active in implementing VEB |
| VEB/VER ⟶ Performance | The effect of implementing VEB and complying with VER will be reflected in the environmental performance of enterprises and the sustainability of their future development |
| External Motivation⟶VEB/VER⟶Performance | The external motivation such as policy environment and the position in industry of enterprises will affect the implementation of VEB and compliance with VER, which will be reflected in the environmental performance and economic effect of enterprises |
| Internal Motivation ⟶ VEB/VER ⟶ Performance | The internal motivation such as corporate honor, development strategy, and quality requirement will affect the implementation of VEB and compliance with VER and then be reflected in the environmental performance and economic effect of the enterprise |
| Motivation ⟶ VEB/VER ⟶ Performance | Internal and external factors interact with each other to influence the implementation of VEB and compliance with VER, which are reflected in the environmental performance and economic effects of enterprises |
Figure 7Theoretical framework for the motivation and influence path of VEB/VER.
VEB vs. VER.
| VEB (no. of text) | VER (ISO14001) | |
|---|---|---|
| VEB (no. of text) | 1 | |
| VER (ISO14001) | 0.201 | 1 |
Figure 8Number of text vs. ISO14001.
PSM results.
| Psmatch2:Treatment | Psmatch2: common support | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assignment | Off support | On support | |
| Untreated | 0 | 1,190 | 1,190 |
| Treated | 1 | 474 | 475 |
| Total | 1 | 1,664 | 1,665 |
Figure 9Density function before matching.
Figure 10Density function after matching.
Balance test before and after covariable matching.
| Variable | Unmatched | Mean | %bias | %reduct bias |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matched | Treated | Control |
|
| ||||
| Ind | U | 2.1747 | 2.0311 | 14.8 | 2.72 | 0.007 | 1 | |
| M | 2.173 | 2.2737 | −10.3 | 29.9 | −1.53 | 0.125 | 0.86 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Own | U | 0.76632 | 0.79076 | −5.9 | −1.09 | 0.274 | . | |
| M | 0.76582 | 0.727 | 9.3 | −58.8 | 1.37 | 0.17 | . | |
|
| ||||||||
| Reg | U | 5.7747 | 5.7874 | −0.3 | −0.05 | 0.961 | 0.98 | |
| M | 5.7848 | 6.0593 | −5.7 | −2068.4 | −0.87 | 0.383 | 0.95 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Size | U | 4.90 | 2.70 | 27.5 | 5.27 | 0 | 1.42 | |
| M | 4.60 | 3.80 | 10.1 | 63.3 | 1.77 | 0.077 | 0.85 | |
|
| ||||||||
| IIR | U | 0.12716 | 0.15176 | −3.1 | −0.48 | 0.628 | 0.06 | |
| M | 0.12686 | 0.12862 | −0.2 | 92.9 | −0.1 | 0.923 | 0.79 | |
|
| ||||||||
| ROA | U | 0.05293 | 0.04712 | 7 | 1.21 | 0.226 | 0.49 | |
| M | 0.05299 | 0.06321 | −12.4 | −76 | −1.85 | 0.064 | 0.45 | |
Figure 11Matching validity test.
The treatment effect of PSM (VER, innovation input).
| Variable | Sample | Treated | Controls | Difference | S.E. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rdexp | Unmatched | 52062112.4 | 23180778.3 | 28881334.1 | 3778724.08 | 7.64 |
| ATT | 50154694.9 | 35042009 | 15112685.9 | 4712594.03 | 3.21 |
PSM results (VER).
| Psmatch2: | Psmatch2:Common support | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment assignment | On support | |
| Untreated | 1,190 | 1,190 |
| Treated | 475 | 475 |
| Total | 1,665 | 1,665 |
PSM results (VEB).
| Psmatch2: | Psmatch2: Common support | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment assignment | Off support | On support | |
| Untreated | 0 | 1,448 | 1,448 |
| Treated | 1 | 216 | 217 |
| Total | 1 | 1,664 | 1,665 |
Figure 12VER density function before matching.
Figure 13VER density function after matching.
Figure 14VEB density function before matching.
Figure 15VEB density function after matching.
Balance test before and after covariable matching (VER).
| Variable | Unmatched | Mean | %bias | %reduct |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matched | Treated | Control | bias |
|
| |||
|
| U | 2.1747 | 2.0311 | 14.8 | 2.72 | 0.007 | 1 | |
| M | 2.1747 | 2.272 | −10 | 32.3 | −1.48 | 0.138 | 0.86 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| U | 0.76632 | 0.79076 | −5.9 | −1.09 | 0.274 | ||
| M | 0.76632 | 0.72758 | 9.3 | −58.5 | 1.37 | 0.17 | ||
|
| ||||||||
|
| U | 5.7747 | 5.7874 | −0.3 | −0.05 | 0.961 | 0.98 | |
| M | 5.7747 | 6.0576 | −5.9 | −2134.5 | −0.9 | 0.368 | 0.95 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| U | 4.90 | 2.70 | 27.5 | 5.27 | 0 | 1.42 | |
| M | 4.90 | 4.00 | 11 | 59.9 | 1.6 | 0.11 | 1.09 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| U | 0.12716 | 0.15176 | −3.1 | −0.48 | 0.628 | 0.06 | |
| M | 0.12716 | 0.12831 | −0.1 | 95.3 | −0.06 | 0.95 | 0.79 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| U | 0.05293 | 0.04712 | 7 | 1.21 | 0.226 | 0.49 | |
| M | 0.05293 | 0.06317 | −12.4 | −76.5 | −1.86 | 0.063 | 0.45 | |
Balance test before and after covariable matching (VEB).
| Variable | Unmatched | Mean | %bias | %reduct |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matched | Treated | Control | bias |
|
| |||
|
| U | 1.9908 | 2.0843 | −9.7 | −1.32 | 0.188 | 0.95 | |
| M | 1.9861 | 2.0485 | −6.5 | 33.3 | −0.69 | 0.488 | 1.09 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| U | 0.75115 | 0.78867 | −8.9 | −1.25 | 0.211 | . | |
| M | 0.75 | 0.68295 | 15.9 | −78.7 | 1.55 | 0.123 | . | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| U | 4.9816 | 5.904 | −19.4 | −2.64 | 0.008 | 0.94 | |
| M | 5 | 5.2383 | −5 | 74.2 | −0.53 | 0.6 | 0.97 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| U | 8.00 | 2.60 | 50.5 | 10.04 | 0 | 5.83 | |
| M | 7.50 | 7.10 | 3.3 | 93.4 | 0.28 | 0.779 | 0.64 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| U | 0.09037 | 0.15289 | −8.6 | −0.92 | 0.359 | 0.05 | |
| M | 0.08955 | 0.08489 | 0.6 | 92.6 | 0.22 | 0.826 | 0.92 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| U | 0.05615 | 0.04768 | 10.3 | 1.32 | 0.187 | 0.64 | |
| M | 0.05631 | 0.06367 | −9 | 13.2 | −0.84 | 0.404 | 0.46 | |
Figure 16VER matching validity test.
Figure 17VEB matching validity test.
The treatment effect of PSM (VER, innovation quality).
| Variable | Sample | Treated | Controls | Difference | S.E. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green | Unmatched | 0.953684211 | 0.36302521 | 0.590659 | 0.074602684 | 7.92 |
| ATT | 0.953684211 | 0.462365003 | 0.491319207 | 0.10055091 | 4.89 |
The treatment effect of PSM (VEB, innovation quality).
| Variable | Sample | Treated | Controls | Difference | S.E. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green | Unmatched | 1.29953917 | 0.416436464 | 0.883102706 | 0.09960144 | 8.87 |
| ATT | 1.30555556 | 0.420138889 | 0.885416667 | 0.160373379 | 5.52 |