| Literature DB >> 32218178 |
Amanda J Morris1, Anita D Christie1,2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a mentally fatiguing task on neuromuscular function in young and older women. Neuromuscular measures were obtained prior to and following 20 minutes of a mentally fatiguing task. Maximal force output significantly decreased after the mental fatigue task (p = 0.02) and this was not different between age groups (p = 0.32). Increases in cortical silent period duration approached significance in both young and older groups (p = 0.06), suggesting that mental fatigue may cause increased cortical inhibition. Measures of peripheral neuromuscular function (contractile properties of the muscle, M-wave) did not change (p ≥ 0.09), suggesting that changes in force production with mental fatigue are more likely due to supraspinal than peripheral mechanisms. These findings provide further evidence of an interaction between mental fatigue and physical function.Entities:
Keywords: aging; mental fatigue; neuromuscular function
Year: 2020 PMID: 32218178 PMCID: PMC7226096 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10040191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Participant characteristics.
| YW ( | OW ( | ES ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, year * | 22.4 ± 2.9 | 74.1 ± 6.3 | 8.5 |
| Height, in | 65.4 ± 3.4 | 64.1 ± 2.1 | 0.29 |
| Weight, kg | 56.2 ± 12.8 | 60.5 ± 8.8 | 0.25 |
| MFI * | 48.1 ± 25.5 | 55.0 ± 14.9 | 0.21 |
| PSQI | 5.3 ± 2.8 | 4.5 ± 2.1 | 0.21 |
| SFR | 3.3 ± 1.6 | 2.0 ± 1.2 | 0.59 |
Values are means ± SD. n, no. of participants; YW, young women; OW, older women; MFI, Multidimensional Fatigue Index; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; SFR, subjective fatigue rating; CSP, cortical silent period; MEP, motor evoked potential; MMax, maximal M-wave; ES, effect size. Higher values indicate more fatigue or poorer sleep quality. * Significant difference between age groups p < 0.05.
Figure 1Overview of experimental timeline. Black solid arrow: electrical stimulation. Black dashed arrow: transcranial magnetic stimulation. Subjective ratings of fatigue were provided before and after the protocol.
Figure 2Baseline (BL) and mental fatigue (MF) maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force values. (A) There was a significant decrease (p = 0.02) in MVC with MF. (B) MVC force after MF protocol. Data presented as percent of BL MVC after MF.
Neuromuscular measures before and after mental fatigue.
| YF ( | OF ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Mental Fatigue | Baseline | Mental Fatigue | ES ( | ES ( | |
| PTF, N | 13.7 ± 5.5 | 12.0 ± 2.6 | 16.5 ± 2.2 | 13.5 ± 5.0 | 0.56 | 0.61 |
| TTP, ms | 86.4 ± 16.8 | 88.8 ± 13.5 | 94.9± 7.7 | 84.8 ± 12.0 | 0.18 | 0.31 |
| HRT, ms | 98.5 ± 10.9 | 89.0 ± 14.8 | 105.9 ± 23.0 | 91.8 ± 23.7 | 0.28 | 0.65 |
| MMax, mv * | 6.0 ± 1.2 | 5.6 ± 1.3 | 4.0 ± 0.8 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.40 |
| CSP, ms | 74.4 ± 6.3 | 81.4 ± 9.7 | 101.4 ± 27.0 | 114.7 ± 30.2 | 1.6 | 0.56 |
| MEP, %MMax | 27.8 ± 8.0 | 23.0 ± 7.9 | 42.9 ± 15.2 | 45.8 ± 17.1 | 1.6 | 0.08 |
Values are means ± SD. PTF, peak twitch force; TTP, time to peak twitch force; HRT, half relaxation time; MMax, m-wave; MEP, motor evoked potential; CSP, cortical silent period; ES, effect size. * indicates a significant difference between ages at baseline p = 0.001.
Figure 3(A) Subjective fatigue ratings. Higher values indicate higher feelings of fatigue. After the mental fatigue task (MF), ratings were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than ratings at baseline (BL). Older women reported lower fatigue than younger adults (p = 0.004). (B) Psychomotor vigilance task reaction time. MF times were significantly slower than BL (p = 0.02).
False starts and lapses during the PVT.
| YF ( | OF ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Mental Fatigue | Baseline | Mental Fatigue | ES ( | ES ( | |
| False Starts * † | 0.38 ± 0.52 | 0.25 ± 0.46 | 2.13 ± 1.5 | 0.75 ± 1.18 | 1.2 | 0.76 |
| Lapses | 0.13 ± 0.35 | 0.63 ± 1.06 | 1.44 ± 1.5 | 0.63 ± 1.36 | 0.61 | 0.16 |
Values are means ± SD. PVT, psychomotor vigilance task; n, no. of participants; YW, young women; OW, older women ES, effect size. * Significant difference between age groups p = 0.01; † Significant difference across time p = 0.02.