M Orth1, J C Rothwell. 1. Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Institute of Neurology, London, UK. m.orth@ion.ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the variability of the duration of the contralateral cortical silent period (CSP) between individuals and to assess the effect of different transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse waveforms. METHODS: In Expt. 1, CSP duration, and the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and area were measured in the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) of 11 subjects on 3 separate occasions using a TMS intensity of 150% active motor threshold (AMT). In Expt. 2, the stimulation intensity was varied between 100% AMT and 150% AMT. In both sets of experiments, 3 types of TMS pulse were used: monophasic posterior-anterior (PA) induced current in the brain, monophasic anterior-posterior induced current (AP), and biphasic PA/AP stimulation. RESULTS: Experiment 1: Between-subject variation in CSP duration was high. In addition, the duration after PA stimulation was significantly shorter than after AP or PA/AP stimulation. However, there was a good correlation between CSP duration and the area, or amplitude, of the MEP. This meant that calculating the ratio of duration/amplitude or duration/area reduced intersubject variability and eliminated differences between TMS pulses. Experiment 2: increasing stimulation intensity increased the mean value of all parameters, but with significantly lower values for PA than other forms of stimulation. The ratios of duration/amplitude or duration/area did not differ between current flow directions and were relatively constant for intensities 130-150% AMT. CONCLUSIONS: Between-subject variation in the duration of the CSP is high. A given intensity of stimulation (expressed in %AMT) produces a shorter CSP for PA stimulation than for AP or PA/AP stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: If the ratio (CSP duration)/(MEP size) is calculated, then intersubject variability is reduced, and TMS pulse type differences are eliminated.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the variability of the duration of the contralateral cortical silent period (CSP) between individuals and to assess the effect of different transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse waveforms. METHODS: In Expt. 1, CSP duration, and the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and area were measured in the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) of 11 subjects on 3 separate occasions using a TMS intensity of 150% active motor threshold (AMT). In Expt. 2, the stimulation intensity was varied between 100% AMT and 150% AMT. In both sets of experiments, 3 types of TMS pulse were used: monophasic posterior-anterior (PA) induced current in the brain, monophasic anterior-posterior induced current (AP), and biphasic PA/AP stimulation. RESULTS: Experiment 1: Between-subject variation in CSP duration was high. In addition, the duration after PA stimulation was significantly shorter than after AP or PA/AP stimulation. However, there was a good correlation between CSP duration and the area, or amplitude, of the MEP. This meant that calculating the ratio of duration/amplitude or duration/area reduced intersubject variability and eliminated differences between TMS pulses. Experiment 2: increasing stimulation intensity increased the mean value of all parameters, but with significantly lower values for PA than other forms of stimulation. The ratios of duration/amplitude or duration/area did not differ between current flow directions and were relatively constant for intensities 130-150% AMT. CONCLUSIONS: Between-subject variation in the duration of the CSP is high. A given intensity of stimulation (expressed in %AMT) produces a shorter CSP for PA stimulation than for AP or PA/AP stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: If the ratio (CSP duration)/(MEP size) is calculated, then intersubject variability is reduced, and TMS pulse type differences are eliminated.
Authors: Janine Reis; Leonardo G Cohen; Phillip L Pearl; Brita Fritsch; Nikolai H Jung; Irene Dustin; William H Theodore Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Giacinta Miscio; Eva Milano; Juan Aguilar; Giulio Savia; Guglielmo Foffani; Alessandro Mauro; Laura Mordillo-Mateos; Javier Romero-Ganuza; Antonio Oliviero Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 1.972