| Literature DB >> 32215049 |
Xulong Liu1, Jinghui Feng1, Jingmin Luan1, Chenxi Dong1, Hefei Fu1, Zhenying Wu2.
Abstract
Infrared thermography (IRT), as a noncontact tool for temperature measurement, is widely applied in the study of acupuncture modernization. The aim of this study was to assess the intra- and interrater reliability of infrared image analysis of facial acupoints of subjects with facial paralysis and determine the factors influencing the variability of the measured values. A total of 26 patients with facial paralysis on one side, aged 26 to 53 years, participated voluntarily in the study. Facial infrared thermal images of all participants were analyzed by two trained raters at two different time points at a one-week interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the intra- and interrater reliability of IRT measurements. The ICC values varied depending on the analyzed acupoints. The reliability of temperature measurement ranged from moderate to excellent (intrarater, ICC ranged from 0.669 to 0.990; interrater, ICC ranged from 0.661 to 0.987). The reliability of temperature difference measurement ranged from low to excellent (intrarater, ICC ranged from 0.412 to 0.882; interrater, ICC ranged from 0.334 to 0.828). The main influencing factor of reliability is the incomplete consistency in selecting acupoint positions when repeatedly positioning the same acupoint manually. Despite low reliability of temperature difference measurement at some acupoints, some auxiliary measures can be used to reduce the error of manual positioning. Thus, infrared thermal imaging still has the potential to assist in objective and quantitative research on acupuncture.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32215049 PMCID: PMC7077041 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9079037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Distribution of the 12 regions of interest on the infrared thermography of the face.
Mean and standard deviation results of acupoint temperature values from 26 participants in two sessions collected by two different raters.
| Acupoint | Rater 1, | Rater 2, | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Session 1 | Session 2 | Session 1 | Session 2 | |
| L GB14 | 34.52 ± 0.77 | 34.51 ± 0.76 | 34.52 ± 0.74 | 34.55 ± 0.76 |
| R GB14 | 34.54 ± 0.84 | 34.56 ± 0.86 | 34.56 ± 0.69 | 34.68 ± 0.76 |
| L LI20 | 34.65 ± 0.74 | 34.66 ± 0.76 | 34.87 ± 0.73 | 34.98 ± 0.73 |
| R LI20 | 34.82 ± 0.71 | 34.76 ± 0.72 | 34.91 ± 0.69 | 35.04 ± 0.70 |
| L ST4 | 34.32 ± 0.79 | 34.31 ± 0.79 | 34.30 ± 0.79 | 34.34 ± 0.79 |
| R ST4 | 34.54 ± 0.71 | 34.46 ± 0.67 | 34.49 ± 0.75 | 34.46 ± 0.72 |
| L EX-HN5 | 33.12 ± 0.94 | 33.34 ± 0.82 | 33.02 ± 0.85 | 33.08 ± 0.79 |
| R EX-HN5 | 33.29 ± 0.83 | 33.35 ± 0.78 | 33.29 ± 0.70 | 33.39 ± 0.74 |
| L ST6 | 32.37 ± 1.06 | 32.31 ± 1.08 | 32.78 ± 1.07 | 32.56 ± 0.94 |
| R ST6 | 32.54 ± 0.96 | 32.63 ± 0.95 | 32.82 ± 0.96 | 32.75 ± 0.94 |
| L ST7 | 33.16 ± 0.78 | 33.14 ± 0.78 | 33.07 ± 0.83 | 32.64 ± 1.02 |
| R ST7 | 33.55 ± 0.72 | 33.56 ± 0.76 | 33.19 ± 0.69 | 32.97 ± 0.72 |
Comparison of mean and standard deviation of side-to-side temperature difference absolute values of facial acupoints from 26 participants with Bell's palsy.
| Acupoint | Rater 1, Δ | Rater 2, Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Session 1 | Session 2 | Session 1 | Session 2 | |
| GB14 | 0.27 ± 0.20 | 0.35 ± 0.30 | 0.25 ± 0.20 | 0.27 ± 0.23 |
| LI20 | 0.27 ± 0.26 | 0.24 ± 0.20 | 0.23 ± 0.20 | 0.22 ± 0.21 |
| ST4 | 0.34 ± 0.28 | 0.36 ± 0.29 | 0.33 ± 0.32 | 0.33 ± 0.29 |
| EX-HN5 | 0.33 ± 0.41 | 0.37 ± 0.39 | 0.55 ± 0.44 | 0.47 ± 0.37 |
| ST6 | 0.42 ± 0.33 | 0.51 ± 0.48 | 0.68 ± 0.65 | 0.48 ± 0.34 |
| ST7 | 0.61 ± 0.46 | 0.62 ± 0.48 | 0.54 ± 0.45 | 0.55 ± 0.43 |
Intrarater reliability of temperature measurement of facial acupoints from 26 participants with Bell's palsy.
| Acupoint | Rater 1 | Rater 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV (%) | ICC | Scale | CV (%) | ICC | Scale | |
| L GB14 | 2.19 | 0.989 | Excellent | 2.15 | 0.990 | Excellent |
| R GB14 | 2.42 | 0.986 | Excellent | 2.07 | 0.952 | Excellent |
| L LI20 | 2.13 | 0.916 | Excellent | 2.08 | 0.960 | Excellent |
| R LI20 | 2.04 | 0.959 | Excellent | 1.99 | 0.946 | Excellent |
| L ST4 | 2.29 | 0.964 | Excellent | 2.28 | 0.972 | Excellent |
| R ST4 | 1.98 | 0.941 | Excellent | 2.12 | 0.860 | Substantial |
| L EX-HN5 | 2.64 | 0.846 | Substantial | 2.46 | 0.745 | Moderate |
| R EX-HN5 | 2.39 | 0.906 | Excellent | 2.14 | 0.873 | Substantial |
| L ST6 | 3.27 | 0.986 | Excellent | 3.08 | 0.874 | Substantial |
| R ST6 | 2.90 | 0.969 | Excellent | 2.86 | 0.701 | Moderate |
| L ST7 | 2.34 | 0.915 | Excellent | 2.88 | 0.669 | Moderate |
| R ST7 | 2.19 | 0.861 | Substantial | 2.13 | 0.714 | Moderate |
CV : coefficient of variation; ICC : intraclass correlation coefficient.
Interrater reliability of temperature measurement of facial acupoints from 26 participants with Bell's palsy.
| Acupoint | Session 1 | Session 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV (%) | ICC | Scale | CV (%) | ICC | Scale | |
| L GB14 | 2.16 | 0.981 | Excellent | 2.18 | 0.987 | Excellent |
| R GB14 | 2.19 | 0.936 | Excellent | 2.32 | 0.935 | Excellent |
| L LI20 | 2.11 | 0.912 | Excellent | 2.16 | 0.922 | Excellent |
| R LI20 | 2.00 | 0.942 | Excellent | 2.06 | 0.946 | Excellent |
| L ST4 | 2.29 | 0.963 | Excellent | 2.28 | 0.942 | Excellent |
| R ST4 | 2.09 | 0.875 | Substantial | 2.00 | 0.951 | Excellent |
| L EX-HN5 | 2.68 | 0.842 | Substantial | 2.43 | 0.842 | Substantial |
| R EX-HN5 | 2.27 | 0.823 | Substantial | 2.25 | 0.818 | Substantial |
| L ST6 | 3.30 | 0.704 | Moderate | 3.11 | 0.765 | Substantial |
| R ST6 | 2.94 | 0.773 | Substantial | 2.86 | 0.850 | Substantial |
| L ST7 | 2.42 | 0.719 | Moderate | 2.84 | 0.848 | Substantial |
| R ST7 | 2.16 | 0.661 | Moderate | 2.39 | 0.718 | Moderate |
CV : coefficient of variation; ICC : intraclass correlation coefficient.
Intra- and interrater reliability of temperature difference measurement of bilateral facial acupoints from 26 participants with Bell's palsy.
| Acupoint | Intrarater reliability | Interrater reliability | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rater 1 | Rater 2 | Session 1 | Session 2 | |||||
| ICC | Scale | ICC | Scale | ICC | Scale | ICC | Scale | |
| GB14 | 0.882 | Substantial | 0.830 | Substantial | 0.721 | Moderate | 0.710 | Moderate |
| LI20 | 0.466 | Moderate | 0.595 | Moderate | 0.828 | Substantial | 0.523 | Moderate |
| ST4 | 0.768 | Substantial | 0.666 | Moderate | 0.650 | Moderate | 0.810 | Substantial |
| EX-HN5 | 0.558 | Moderate | 0.643 | Moderate | 0.336 | Low | 0.423 | Moderate |
| ST6 | 0.798 | Substantial | 0.421 | Moderate | 0.477 | Moderate | 0.356 | Low |
| ST7 | 0.706 | Moderate | 0.412 | Moderate | 0.334 | Low | 0.599 | Moderate |
ICC : intraclass correlation coefficient; CI : confidence interval.
Figure 2Bland–Altman plot for intrarater agreement between two sets of the temperature values collected during the two sessions, 6.57% of all readings done fell outside the 95% agreement limits.
Figure 3Bland–Altman plot for interrater agreement between two sets of the temperature values collected by two different raters, 6.25% of all readings done fell outside the 95% agreement limits.
Figure 4Bland–Altman plot for intrarater agreement between two sets of the side-to-side temperature differences (ΔT) collected during the two sessions, 7.69% of all readings done fell outside the 95% agreement limits.
Figure 5Bland–Altman plot for interrater agreement between two sets of the side-to-side temperature differences (∆T) collected by two different raters, 7.37% of all readings done fell outside the 95% agreement limits.
The inconsistent rate of temperature values of facial acupoints and temperature difference values between left and right acupoints in patients with Bell's palsy during repeated measurements.
| Acupoint | Intrarater disagreement | Interrater disagreement | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Δ |
| Δ | |
| GB14 | 1.92% (2/104) | 1.92% (7/52) | 3.85% (4/104) | 19.2% (10/52) |
| LI20 | 5.77% (6/104) | 5.77% (3/52) | 15.4% (16/104) | 17.3% (9/52) |
| ST4 | 9.62% (10/104) | 19.2% (10/52) | 3.85% (4/104) | 17.3% (9/52) |
| EX-HN5 | 19.2% (20/104) | 25% (13/52) | 20.2% (21/104) | 34.6% (18/52) |
| ST6 | 19.2% (20/104) | 32.7% (17/52) | 32.7% (34/104) | 30.8% (16/52) |
| ST7 | 22.1% (23/104) | 23.1% (12/52) | 48.1% (50/104) | 25% (13/52) |
Note: Subscript 1-2 represents the first measurement and the second measurement. The Tsk of each acupoint area contains skin temperature values in two regions of interest (ROIs) on the left and right sides of the face. ΔT represents the absolute value of the temperature difference between the two ROIs on the left and right sides of an acupoint. In this study, the inconsistency between the two Tsk values in two repeated measurements is defined as that the absolute value of the difference between the two measurements is greater than 0.5°C. The inconsistency between the two ΔT values is defined as a ΔT of less than 0.5°C, while the other measured ΔT is greater than 0.5°C. Tsk1-2 > 0.5 and ΔT1-2 > 0.5 refers to the ratio between the number of inconsistent measurements and the total number of measurements in the repeated measurements.