| Literature DB >> 32214212 |
Sara Vicente-Muñoz1, Teresa Cobo2,3, Leonor Puchades-Carrasco4,5, Ana B Sánchez-García6, Núria Agustí6, Montse Palacio6,7, Antonio Pineda-Lucena4,5,8,9, Eduard Gratacós6,7.
Abstract
Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) is only identified by amniocentesis, an invasive procedure that limits its clinical translation. Here, we aimed to evaluate whether the vaginal metabolome discriminates the presence/absence of MIAC in women with preterm labor (PTL) and intact membranes. We conducted a case-control study in women with symptoms of PTL below 34 weeks who underwent amniocentesis to discard MIAC. MIAC was defined as amniotic fluid positive for microorganisms identified by specific culture media. The cohort included 16 women with MIAC and 16 control (no MIAC). Both groups were matched for age and gestational age at admission. Vaginal fluid samples were collected shortly after amniocentesis. Metabolic profiles were analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and compared using multivariate and univariate statistical analyses to identify significant differences between the two groups. The vaginal metabolomics profile of MIAC showed higher concentrations of hypoxanthine, proline, choline and acetylcholine and decreased concentrations of phenylalanine, glutamine, isoleucine, leucine and glycerophosphocholine. In conclusion, metabolic changes in the NMR-based vaginal metabolic profile are able to discriminate the presence/absence of MIAC in women with PTL and intact membranes. These metabolic changes might be indicative of enhanced glycolysis triggered by hypoxia conditions as a consequence of bacterial infection, thus explaining the utilization of alternative energy sources in an attempt to replenish glucose.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32214212 PMCID: PMC7096387 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62542-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Maternal characteristics and perinatal outcome.
| MIAC group (n = 16) | No-MIAC group–Control (n = 16) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age | 33.4 (24.2; 37.6) | 31.8 (27.0; 35.7) | 0.386 |
| Caucasian ethnicity | 16 (100) | 15 (93.8) | 1.000 |
| Nulliparity | 8 (50) | 8 (50) | 1.000 |
| Prior PTD | 4 (25) | 3 (18.8) | 1.000 |
| CRP (mg/L) at admission | 3.8 (0.8;7) | 0.6 (0.3; 1.3) | 0.002 |
| WBC (x109/L) at admission | 12280 (10077; 16652) | 12635 (9832; 14600) | 0.546 |
| US CL (mm) at admission | 3 (0; 25) | 15 (8; 23) | 0.097 |
| Positive genital cultures at admission | 8 (50) | 3 (18.8) | 0.135 |
| GA at sampling (weeks) | 25.0 (22.3; 30.3) | 26.9 (26.3; 30.8) | 0.169 |
| AF glucose (mg/d) | 4 (1.2; 14) | 33.5 (24.2; 38.7) | <0.0001 |
| Steroid administration | 13 (81.2) | 15 (93.8) | 0.600 |
| Antibiotic treatment | 16 (100) | 5 (31.2) | <0.0001 |
| Antibiotic treatment prior to vaginal sampling (days) | 0 (0; 0) | 0 (−0.5; 30.5) | 0.839 |
| Tocolysis treatment | 14 (87.5) | 15 (93.8) | 1.000 |
| GA at delivery (weeks) | 26.3 (25.1; 30.5) | 37.1 (34.1; 39.9) | <0.0001 |
| Latency from sampling to delivery (days) | 2.5 (1; 5.7) | 63 (40.2; 79.7) | <0.0001 |
| Birth weight (g) | 870 (667.5; 1363.7) | 2894 (1985; 3407.5) | <0.0001 |
| Male gender | 6 (37.5) | 7 (43.8) | 1.000 |
MIAC: Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity; PTD: Preterm delivery; CRP: C-reactive protein; WBC: White blood cells; US CL: Ultrasound cervical length; GA: Gestational age; AF: Amniotic fluid. Continuous variables were compared using a nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test presented as medians (25th; 75th percentile). Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher exact test and presented as number (%). p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 1Representative 600-MHz 1H-NMR spectrum of a vaginal fluid sample from a woman with presence of MIAC. (A) Full spectrum (δ 8.5–0.5 ppm); (B) Magnification of the spectrum region from δ 5.6–8.4 ppm.
Figure 2Multivariate Statistical model resulting from the analysis of 1H-CPMG spectra for the comparison between control individual (red) vs. women with MIAC (black) and the corresponding internal cross-validation test. (A) OPLS-DA score plot calculated after variable selection (R2Y(cum): 0.535; Q2(cum): 0.405) showing the separation between both groups of samples. (B) Permutation test (n = 100) obtained from the corresponding PLS-DA model with an equivalent number of components used for the OPLS-DA model with values of intercepts R2: 0.402 and Q2: −0.197.
Variations for the statistically significant metabolites involved in the discrimination between women with MIAC (n = 16) and without (n = 16).
| δ 1H (ppm)a | Metabolite(s) | % Variationc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.1845–8.1715 | Hypoxanthine | 0.001 | 85.90 |
| 7.3845–7.3425 | Phenylalanine | 0.032 | −35.14 |
| 3.3405–3.3315 | Proline | 0.003 | 88.83 |
| 3.2135–3.2045 | Glycerophosphocholine | 0.007 | −32.85 |
| 3.2035–3.1955 | Acetylcholine | 0.042 | 30.96 |
| 3.1945–3.1795 | Choline | 0.007 | 71.56 |
| 2.3515–2.3105 | Glutamine | 0.004 | −29.66 |
| 1.0035–0.9914 | Isoleucine | 0.046 | −27.63 |
| 0.9604–0.9374 | Leucine | 0.035 | −33.69 |
aChemical shift range for the integration; bp. value calculated by Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test; crelative variation of the metabolite levels in women with MIAC compared with women without MIAC.