| Literature DB >> 32213841 |
Paweł Więch1, Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska1, Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej1, Justyna Kilian1, Ewa Lenart-Domka1,2, Agnieszka Bejer1, Elżbieta Domka-Jopek1, Bernard Sozański1, Bartosz Korczowski3.
Abstract
The monitoring of children with cerebral palsy (CP) should include a precise assessment of the nutritional status to identify children and adolescents at risk of nutrition disorders. Available studies assessing the nutritional status of children with CP mainly focus on the relationship between body composition and the coexistence of motor dysfunctions, frequently overlooking the role of muscle tone. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the relationship between body composition and muscle tone in children with CP. In a case-control study (n = 118; mean age 11 y; SD = 3.8), the children with CP presented various stages of functional capacities, corresponding to all the levels in gross motor function classification system (GMFSC), and muscle tone described by all the grades in Ashworth scale. The control group consisted of healthy children and adolescents, strictly matched for gender and age in a 1:1 case-control manner. The children with CP were found with significantly lower mean values of fat-free mass (FFM kg = 29.2 vs. 34.5, p < 0.001), muscle mass (MM kg = 18.6 vs. 22.6, p < 0.001), body cell mass (BCM kg = 15.1 vs. 18.3, p < 0.001), and total body water (TBW L = 23.0 vs. 26.7, p < 0.001). The same differences in body composition were identified with respect to gender (p < 0.01 respectively). Moreover, children with higher muscle tone (higher score in Ashworth scale) were found with significantly lower values of fat mass (FM), FFM, MM, BCM, and TBW (p < 0.05). The findings showed lower parameters of body composition in the children with CP compared to the healthy children, and a decrease in the parameters coinciding with higher muscle tone in the study group. This observation suggests that it is necessary to measure muscle tone while assessing nutritional status of children with CP.Entities:
Keywords: Ashworth Scale; electric bioimpedance; nutritional assessment; rehabilitation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32213841 PMCID: PMC7146599 DOI: 10.3390/nu12030864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Anthropometric parameters of the study and control groups—estimation of difference between CP and controls using ANCOVA model with age as covariate.
| Parameter | CP vs. Controls | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | Girls | |||||
| Effect Size (95% CI) | Effect Size (95% CI) | |||||
| Weight (kg) | −6.6 (−9.9; −3.2) | 16.25 |
| −5.8 (−9.7; −1.8) | 7.99 |
|
| Height (cm) | −5.8 (−8.7; −3.0) | 14.87 |
| −7.0 (−10.3; −3.7) | 17.32 |
|
| BMI (kg/m2) | −1.6 (−2.6; −0.6) | 10.16 |
| −0.8 (−2.4; 0.7) | 1.08 | 0.3022 |
| R-resistance | 83.7 (54.7; 112.7) | 31.99 |
| 41.4 (−2.0; 84.7) | 3.49 | 0.0652 |
| Xc-reactance | 4.3 (1.0; 7.6) | 6.44 |
| 0.4 (−3.1; 4.0) | 0.06 | 0.8075 |
| BMR | −452 (−621; −283) | 27.45 |
| −306 (−494; −118) | 10.21 |
|
Abbreviations: BMI—body mass index; BMR-basal metabolic rate; * Bold characters indicate significant values (p < 0.05), ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Comparison of BIA results in study and control groups—estimation of difference between CP and controls using ANCOVA model with age as covariate.
| Parameter | CP vs. Controls | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect Size (95% CI) | |||
| FM (kg) | −0.9 (−2.4; 0.5) | 1.57 | 0.2109 |
| FMpct (%) | −0.4 (−2.9; 2.0) | 0.12 | 0.7314 |
| FFM (kg) | −5.3 (−7.0; −3.5) | 34.87 |
|
| FFMpct (%) | 0.3 (−2.1; 2.7) | 0.06 | 0.8135 |
| MM (kg) | −4.0 (−5.4; −2.6) | 32.49 |
|
| MMpct (%) | −1.4 (−3.3; 0.5) | 1.99 | 0.1602 |
| BCM (kg) | −3.3 (−4.4; −2.1) | 31.58 |
|
| BCMpct (%) | −1.9 (−3.1; −0.8) | 10.45 |
|
| BCMI (kg/m2) | −0.8 (−1.2; −0.5) | 20.24 |
|
| TBW (l) | −3.6 (−4.9; −2.3) | 30.70 |
|
| TBWpct (%) | 1.2 (−1.2; 3.6) | 0.93 | 0.3366 |
| PA (°) | −0.3 (−0.5; −0.1) | 6.35 |
|
Abbreviations: FM—fat mass; FFM—fat free mass; MM—muscle mass; BCM—body cell mass; BCMI—body cell mass index; TBW—total body water; PA—phase angle; * Bold characters indicate significant values (p < 0.05).
Comparison of BIA results in study and control groups according to gender - estimation of difference between CP and controls using ANCOVA model with age as covariate.
| Parameter | CP vs. Controls | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | Girls | |||||
| Effect Size (95% CI) | Effect Size (95% CI) | |||||
| FM (kg) | −0.5 (−2.3; 1.3) | 0.35 | 0.5542 | −1.7 (−4.1; 0.8) | 1.74 | 0.1908 |
| FMpct (%) | −0.3 (−3.4; 2.8) | 0.04 | 0.8427 | −0.6 (−4.3; 3.0) | 0.12 | 0.7330 |
| FFM (kg) | −5.9 (−8.1; −3.7) | 27.22 |
| −4.1 (−6.2; −2.0) | 14.18 |
|
| FFMpct (%) | 0.1 (−2.9; 3.1) | 0.00 | 0.9486 | 0.6 (−3.0; 4.3) | 0.12 | 0.7330 |
| MM (kg) | −4.5 (−6.2; −2.8) | 27.85 |
| −3.0 (−4.9; −1.2) | 10.55 |
|
| MMpct (%) | −1.8 (−4.1; 0.5) | 2.24 | 0.1364 | −0.7 (−3.9; 2.4) | 0.21 | 0.6502 |
| BCM (kg) | −3.7 (−5.1; −2.3) | 26.94 |
| −2.5 (−4.1; −1.0) | 10.27 |
|
| BCMpct (%) | −2.1 (−3.5; −0.7) | 8.29 |
| −1.6 (−3.5; 0.4) | 2.55 | 0.1145 |
| BCMI (kg/m2) | −1.0 (−1.5; −0.6) | 24.95 |
| −0.4 (−1.1; 0.2) | 1.69 | 0.1976 |
| TBW (l) | −4.2 (−5.8; −2.6) | 27.00 |
| −2.6 (−4.0; −1.2) | 12.69 |
|
| TBWpct (%) | 1.1 (−1.9; 4.1) | 0.48 | 0.4900 | 1.4 (−2.1; 4.8) | 0.62 | 0.4345 |
| PA (°) | −0.3 (−0.6; −0.1) | 6.96 |
| −0.2 (−0.6; 0.2) | 0.79 | 0.3752 |
Abbreviations: FM—fat mass; FFM—fat free mass; MM—muscle mass; BCM—body cell mass; BCMI—body cell mass index; TBW—total body water; PA—phase angle. * Bold characters indicate significant values (p < 0.05).
Selected components of body composition in the children with CP relative to muscle tone level according to Ashworth scale.
| Parameter | Ashworth Index (2–4 vs. 0–1 pts) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect Size (95% CI) | |||
| FM (kg) | −2.7 (−4.8; −0.5) | 5.88 |
|
| FMpct (%) | −0.9 (−4.7; 3.0) | 0.18 | 0.6680 |
| FFM (kg) | −3.3 (−5.8; −0.9) | 6.96 |
|
| FFMpct (%) | 1.1 (−2.8; 4.9) | 0.31 | 0.5793 |
| MM (kg) | −2.1 (−4.1; 0.0) | 3.97 |
|
| MMpct (%) | 0.8 (−2.4; 4.0) | 0.25 | 0.6178 |
| BCM (kg) | −1.7 (−3.4; 0.0) | 3.97 |
|
| BCMpct (%) | −0.1 (−2.2; 1.9) | 0.01 | 0.9046 |
| BCMI (kg/m2) | −0.4 (−1.0; 0.2) | 1.63 | 0.2049 |
| TBW (l) | −2.7 (−4.6; −0.9) | 8.34 |
|
| TBWpct (%) | 0.1 (−3.8; 3.9) | 0.00 | 0.9790 |
| PA (°) | 0.0 (−0.4; 0.4) | 0.04 | 0.8477 |
Abbreviations: FM—fat mass; FFM—fat free mass; MM—muscle mass; BCM—body cell mass; BCMI—body cell mass index; TBW—total body water; PA—phase angle; * Bold characters indicate significant values (p < 0.05); the significance of the inter-group differences was assessed using analysis of covariance which took into account age as an accompanying variable. Analysis is based on a dichotomous distinction of two groups, according the score in Ashworth Scale (one group with scores of 0–1; the other group with scores of 2–4).
Figure 1Effects of muscle tone in muscle mass and total body water in the children with CP. Abbreviations: MM—muscle mass; effect of muscle tone in body composition of children with CP shown using linear regression.
Selected components of body composition in the children with CP relative to motor function level according to GMFCS.
| Parameter | GMFCS (level III-V vs. I-II) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect Size (95% CI) | |||
| FM (kg) | −1.2 (−3.8; 1.3) | 0.90 | 0.3453 |
| FMpct (%) | 2.7 (−1.8; 7.1) | 1.38 | 0.2430 |
| FFM (kg) | −6.2 (−8.9; −3.5) | 20.26 |
|
| FFMpct (%) | −2.5 (−6.8; 1.9) | 1.20 | 0.2749 |
| MM (kg) | −4.6 (−6.8; −2.3) | 16.27 |
|
| MMpct (%) | −3.3 (−6.9; 0.3) | 3.14 | 0.0790 |
| BCM (kg) | −3.8 (−5.6; −1.9) | 16.05 |
|
| BCMpct (%) | −2.4 (−4.7; 0.0) | 3.92 | 0.0501 |
| BCMI (kg) | −0.9 (−1.5; −0.2) | 7.01 |
|
| TBW (l) | −4.9 (−6.9; −2.9) | 22.77 |
|
| TBWpct (%) | −2.6 (−7.0; 1.8) | 1.39 | 0.2407 |
| PA (kg) | −0.4 (−0.9; 0.0) | 3.12 | 0.0801 |
Abbreviations: FM—fat mass; FFM—fat free mass; MM—muscle mass; BCM—body cell mass; BCMI—body cell mass index; TBW—total body water; PA—phase angle. * Bold characters indicate significant values (p < 0.05); the significance of the inter-group differences was assessed using ANCOVA model with GMFCS as a group variable and age as a control variable.
Figure 2Effects of motor function in muscle mass and total body water in the children with CP.