| Literature DB >> 32210226 |
Tapash Jay Sarkar1,2,3, Marco Quarta4,5,6,7, Shravani Mukherjee8, Alex Colville9,10,11,12, Patrick Paine9,10,11,13, Linda Doan9,10,11,13, Christopher M Tran9,10,11, Constance R Chu8,14, Steve Horvath15,16, Lei S Qi17, Nidhi Bhutani8, Thomas A Rando9,10,11, Vittorio Sebastiano18,19.
Abstract
Aging is characterized by a gradual loss of function occurring at the molecular, cellular, tissue and organismal levels. At the chromatin level, aging associates with progressive accumulation of epigenetic errors that eventually lead to aberrant gene regulation, stem cell exhaustion, senescence, and deregulated cell/tissue homeostasis. Nuclear reprogramming to pluripotency can revert both the age and the identity of any cell to that of an embryonic cell. Recent evidence shows that transient reprogramming can ameliorate age-associated hallmarks and extend lifespan in progeroid mice. However, it is unknown how this form of rejuvenation would apply to naturally aged human cells. Here we show that transient expression of nuclear reprogramming factors, mediated by expression of mRNAs, promotes a rapid and broad amelioration of cellular aging, including resetting of epigenetic clock, reduction of the inflammatory profile in chondrocytes, and restoration of youthful regenerative response to aged, human muscle stem cells, in each case without abolishing cellular identity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32210226 PMCID: PMC7093390 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15174-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Transcriptomic and epigenetic clock analysis shows more youthful signature upon transient expression of OSKMNL in human fibroblasts and endothelial cells.
a Venn diagrams show differentially expressed genes in fibroblasts (young, n = 3 individuals; aged and aged treated n = 3 individuals) defined with at significance p value >0.05 and log fold change >0.5. Comparison among the three groups was conducted by ANOVA test. b Schematic of reprogramming protocol. c Volcano plot showing young versus aged fibroblast differential gene expression. d Heat map of polarity of expression (green = above, purple = below) the mean for each differential gene. The distribution shows the treated samples transition in expression in this space towards the direction of the young fibroblasts. Cells in each cohort were subjected to 80 bp paired-end reads of RNA sequencing and quantile normalized. e Venn diagrams show differentially expressed genes in endothelial cells (young, n = 3 individuals; aged and age-treated n = 3 individuals) defined at significance p value >0.05 and log fold change >0.5. Comparison among the three groups was conducted by ANOVA test. f Volcano plot showing young versus aged endothelial cells differential gene expression. g Heat map of polarity of expression (green = above, purple = below) the mean for each differential gene. The distribution shows the treated samples transition in expression in this space towards the direction of the young endothelial cells. h Methylation clock estimation of patient sample age with and without treatment for fibroblasts; n = 4 individuals. i Methylation clock estimation of patient sample age with and without treatment for endothelial cells; n = 4 individuals. Statistical analysis of methylation clock was performed by two-sided t-test analysis.
Fig. 2Transient OSKMNL expression reverts aged physiology toward a more youthful state in human fibroblasts and endothelial cells.
a Fibroblasts (F) and endothelial cells were obtained from otherwise healthy young and aged individuals. Young untreated cells (n = 3 distinct individuals for both fibroblasts and endothelial cells, dark blue), aged untreated cells (n = 8 individuals for fibroblast, n = 7 individuals for endothelial cells, red), and aged treated cells (n = 8 for fibroblast, n = 7 for endothelial cells, light blue) were analyzed for a panel of 11 different hallmarks of aging. Most of the assays were performed by high-throughput imaging on 500–1000 cells per sample to allow population-wide studies with single-cell resolution (Supplementary Figs. 2–5). 100 cells per sample (i.e., individuals) were randomly selected and pooled per treatment group to do a statistical comparison across the three groups (young fibroblasts n = 300; aged fibroblasts n = 800; aged treated fibroblasts n = 800; young endothelial cells n = 300; aged endothelial cells n = 700; aged treated endothelial cells n = 700). Pairwise statistical analysis was done by one-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. b Quantification of single-nucleus levels of trimethylated H3K9, a repressive mark of gene expression. Both cell types show significant elevation of the mark towards the youthful distribution. c Quantification of single-nucleus levels of heterochromatin marker HP1γ by immunocytochemistry showing a trend toward youth upon treatment. d Quantification of the inner nuclear membrane polypeptide LAP2α, a regulator of nuclear lamina by regulating the binding of lamin B1 and chromatin. This again shows a trend toward youth after cells are treated. e Results of live cells imaging with florescent marker of autophagosome formation in single cells. f Cleavage of fluorescent-tagged chymotrypsin-like substrate elevated in treated and young fibroblasts and endothelial cells corresponding to increased proteasome 20S core particle activity. g Individual cell mitochondria membrane potential measurements also showing more active mitochondria as a result of transient reprogramming. Quantification of pro-inflammatory factors secreted by the cells in each cohort. h Individual cell mitochondria ROS measurements also showing less accumulated ROS as a result of transient reprogramming. i Inflammatory cytokine profiling in endothelial cells, with a significant elevation and depression specifically in aged and treated endothelial cells, respectively. In b–h data are represented as box–whisker plots with median, and bars represent whiskers with distribution variability 10th–90th percentile. In f–j data are represented as mean values and bars represent SD.
Fig. 3Transient OSKMNL expression mitigates inflammatory phenotypes in diseased chondrocytes.
a Workflow summarizing the strategy adopted to mitigation of age-related disease. Chondrocytes were obtained from six distinct aged patients diagnosed late stage Osteoarthritis (OA) patients from cartilage biopsies. Healthy cells (blue), aged OA cells (red) and transiently reprogrammed OA cells (light blue) were evaluated for OA specific phenotypes. b qRT-PCR evaluation shows treatment diminishes of intracellular RNA levels of NF-κB ligand RANKL. c qRT-PCR evaluation shows treatment drops levels of iNOS for producing nitric oxide as a response and to propagate inflammatory stimulus. d Cytokine profiling of chondrocyte secretions shows an increase pro-inflammatory cytokines in OA chondrocytes that diminishes with treatment. e Cell proliferation rate as measured by cell-tracking dye. f Measurement of ATP concentration using glycerol based fluorophore shows elevation of ATP levels with treatment. g Live single-cell image of cells up taking superoxide triggered fluorescent dyes shows diminished signal after treatment. h qRT-PCR evaluation of RNA levels of antioxidant SOD2, elevated with treatment. i qRT-PCR levels of chondrogenic identity and function transcription factor SOX9 is retained after treatment. j qRT-PCR shows elevation RNA levels for extracellular matrix protein component. Young samples n = 3 individuals; aged OA samples treated and untreated n = 6 individuals. Pairwise statistical analysis was done by one-way ANOVA. For ROS (g) analysis was conducted by high-throughput imaging on 500–1000 cells per sample to allow population-wide studies with single-cell resolution. One-hundred cells per sample were randomly selected to do a statistical comparison across the three groups. Statistical analysis was then done by one-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA was conducted for all the other assays.
Fig. 4Transient OSKMNL expression restores aged muscle stem cell potency.
a Schematic showing the experimental design of partially reprogrammed aged mouse and human MuSCs. b Representative images of bioluminescence measured from mice 11 days after transplantation and injury in TiA muscles of treated/untreated Luciferase+ mouse MuSCs. c Quantified results of bioluminescence in b at different time points following transplantation and injury (n = 10). d Representative immunofluorescence of GFP expression in TiA muscle cross-sections of mice imaged and quantified in c and d, isolated 11 days after transplantation (Scale bar = 500 μm). e Quantification of immunofluorescence staining in d (n = 5). f Quantification of the cross-sectional area of donor-derived GFP + fibers in TiA muscles that were recipients of transplanted MuSCs (n = 5). g Results of bioluminescence imaging of TiA muscles reinjured after 60 days (second injury) after MuSC transplantations (n = 6). The second injury was performed to test whether the bioluminescence signal increased as a consequence of activating and expanding luciferase+/GFP+ MuSCs that were initially transplanted and that had engrafted under the basal lamina. h Tetanic force measurements of aged muscles injured and transplanted with aged MuSCs. TiA muscles were dissected and electrophysiology ex vivo for tetanic measurement performed. Baseline of force production of untransplanted muscles was measured in young (4 months, blue broken line) and aged (27 months, red broken line) mice. Treated aged MuSCs were transplanted into TiA muscles of aged mice and force production measured 30 days later (n = 5). i Quantified results of bioluminescence measured from mice 11 days after transplantation in TiA muscles of treated Luciferase+ human MuSCs. j Variation in ratio of bioluminescence between treated and untreated MuSCs obtained from healthy donors of different age groups. Significance is calculated with one-sided student’s t test, pairwise between treated and aged, and group wise when comparing with young patients (age groups. 10–30: n = 5 individuals; 30–55: n = 7 individuals; 60–80: n = 5 individuals). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, color of the asterisks matches the population being compared with.