Literature DB >> 32206529

Increased Defect Size is Associated with Increased Complication Rate after Free Tissue Transfer for Midanterior Skull-Base Reconstruction.

Ryota Nakamura1,2, Keisuke Takanari2, Yutaka Nakamura2, Miki Kambe2, Masashi Hishida3, Katsumi Ebisawa2, Yasushi Fujimoto4, Masazumi Fujii5, Yuzuru Kamei2.   

Abstract

Objective  Complications after skull-base reconstruction are often problematic. We consider that local factors, for example, localization of defect areas are possible risk factors. This study aimed to investigate our case series of skull-base reconstructions in our institution and to identify local risk factors that predispose to wound complications. Design  This study is presented as a retrospective study. Setting  Research work was took place at Nagoya University Hospital. Participants  Forty-eight patients who had undergone reconstruction after midanterior skull-base resection between January 2004 and December 2015 were included in this study. Defects apart from the skull-base were categorized into nasal and paranasal cavity (N), orbit (O), palate (P), and facial skin (S). Postoperative local complications including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, local infection, wound dehiscence (fistula in face or palate), and flap necrosis (partial or total) were investigated. Main Outcome Measures  Main outcome measures were postoperative complications in patients with each defect. Results  Apart from the skull-base, defects included 28 ONP (58.3%), 10 ONPS (20.8%), 3 ON (6.3%), 3 ONS (6.3%), 1 NP (2.1%), and 1 OS (2.1%). Comparison based on numbers of resected regions revealed that a significantly higher complication rate was seen in patients with four resected regions than in those with three regions (90.0% vs. 45.2%, p  < 0.05). Conclusion  There was a trend suggesting that more resected regions corresponded to a greater risk of complications in midanterior skull-base reconstruction. Reconstructive surgeons need to carefully consider the reconstruction of such complicated defects. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Skull-base reconstruction; free flap; microsurgery; postoperative complication

Year:  2019        PMID: 32206529      PMCID: PMC7082168          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  13 in total

1.  Preoperative surgical simulation and validation of the line of resection in anterolateral craniofacial resection of advanced sinonasal sinus carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoki Nishio; Masazumi Fujii; Yuichiro Hayashi; Mariko Hiramatsu; Takashi Maruo; Kenichiro Iwami; Yuzuru Kamei; Shunjiro Yagi; Keisuke Takanari; Yasushi Fujimoto
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Analysis of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing skull base reconstruction.

Authors:  Kuylhee Kim; Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Pieter G L Koolen; Nargiz Seyidova; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  A new concept for classifying skull base defects for reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Yano; Mutsumi Okazaki; Kentarou Tanaka; Hideo Iida; Masaru Aoyagi; Atsunobu Tsunoda; Seiji Kishimoto
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-04

4.  Skull base reconstruction: an updated approach.

Authors:  Matthew M Hanasono; Amanda Silva; Roman J Skoracki; Paul W Gidley; Franco DeMonte; Ehab Y Hanna; David W Chang; Peirong Yu
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Tumors of the skull base: outcome and survival analysis of 77 cases.

Authors:  J C Irish; P J Gullane; F Gentili; J Freeman; J B Boyd; D Brown; J Rutka
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Free tissue transfer for skull base reconstruction analysis of complications and a classification scheme for defining skull base defects.

Authors:  M L Urken; P J Catalano; C Sen; K Post; N Futran; H F Biller
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1993-12

7.  Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects.

Authors:  D J Okay; E Genden; D Buchbinder; M Urken
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Reconstructive management of cranial base defects after tumor ablation.

Authors:  D W Chang; H N Langstein; A Gupta; F De Monte; K A Do; X Wang; G Robb
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Chimeric anterolateral thigh free flap for reconstruction of complex cranio-orbito-facial defects after skull base cancers resection.

Authors:  Mario Cherubino; Mario Turri-Zanoni; Paolo Battaglia; Marco Giudice; Igor Pellegatta; Federico Tamborini; Francesca Maggiulli; Luca Guzzetti; Danilo Di Giovanna; Maurizio Bignami; Carolina Calati; Paolo Castelnuovo; Luigi Valdatta
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 10.  Free flap options for reconstruction of complicated scalp and calvarial defects: report of a series of cases and literature review.

Authors:  Kao-Ping Chang; Ching-Hung Lai; Chih-Hau Chang; Chih-Lung Lin; Chung-Sheng Lai; Sin-Daw Lin
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.425

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.