Literature DB >> 25569392

Analysis of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing skull base reconstruction.

Kuylhee Kim1, Ahmed M S Ibrahim, Pieter G L Koolen, Nargiz Seyidova, Samuel J Lin.   

Abstract

The relative rarity of skull base tumors has limited surgeons' ability to report on morbidity and mortality in a large and nationwide patient series. We aimed to assess the impact of reconstructive procedures on patients undergoing skull base surgery and to determine whether 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality varied between patients who underwent reconstruction and those who did not. We performed a retrospective analysis using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005 to 2012 databases. Chi-squared tests were used for categorical variables and t-tests were used for continuous variables. Multiple logistic regression analysis predicted the influence of preoperative and operative variables on complications. A total of 479 patients were included in our study; 199 patients received concurrent reconstruction. There was no statistically significant difference in wound complication, morbidity, length of total hospital stay, and mortality between the 2 groups. The reconstruction cohort showed significantly longer operative times (416.45 [207.585] versus 319.99 [222.813] min, P = 0.001) and higher return to the operating room rate (13.6% versus 6.1%, P = 0.005). Reconstruction using pedicled flaps was associated with increased odds of wound complications (odds ratio, 4.937; P = 0.023), and microsurgical reconstruction was associated with return to the operating room (odds ratio, 2.212; P = 0.015). According to logistic regression, dyspnea, diabetes mellitus, functional status, and tumor involving the central nervous system were associated with complications. This study is the first comprehensive analysis of reconstruction after skull base surgery. Additional measures involved in flap reconstruction are associated with an increase in operation time and return to the operating room rate but not with complications, morbidity, or mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25569392     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  4 in total

Review 1.  Reconstruction after open surgery for skull-base malignancies.

Authors:  Matthew M Hanasono
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Increased Defect Size is Associated with Increased Complication Rate after Free Tissue Transfer for Midanterior Skull-Base Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ryota Nakamura; Keisuke Takanari; Yutaka Nakamura; Miki Kambe; Masashi Hishida; Katsumi Ebisawa; Yasushi Fujimoto; Masazumi Fujii; Yuzuru Kamei
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-26

3.  The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-Day Challenge: Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Reporting Reliability.

Authors:  Austin D Chen; Parisa Kamali; Anmol S Chattha; Alexandra Bucknor; Justin B Cohen; Patrick P Bletsis; Renata Flecha-Hirsch; Adam M Tobias; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-03-06

4.  Reconstruction of Large Tissue Defects After the Resection of Brain Tumors Using a Skin Flap With Vascular Pedicle.

Authors:  Jie Bai; Jiayue Fu; Xinru Xiao
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 1.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.