Literature DB >> 32206528

Three-Dimensional Surface Reconstruction of the Human Cochlear Nucleus: Implications for Auditory Brain Stem Implant Design.

Osama Tarabichi1, Vivek V Kanumuri1,2, Julian Klug1,3, Nicolas Vachicouras4, Maria J Duarte1, Lorenz Epprecht1, Elliott D Kozin1,2, Katherine Reinshagen5, Stéphanie P Lacour4, M Christian Brown1,2, Daniel J Lee1,2.   

Abstract

Objective  The auditory brain stem implant (ABI) is a neuroprosthesis placed on the surface of the cochlear nucleus (CN) to provide hearing sensations in children and adults who are not candidates for cochlear implantation. Contemporary ABI arrays are stiff and do not conform to the curved brain stem surface. Recent advancements in microfabrication techniques have enabled the development of flexible surface arrays, but these have only been applied in animal models. Herein, we measure the surface curvature of the human CN and adjoining regions to assist in the design and placement of next-generation conformable clinical ABI arrays. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from ultrahigh T1-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences and histologic reconstructions based on postmortem adult human brain stem specimens were used. Design  This is a retrospective review of radiologic data and postmortem histologic axial sections. Setting  This is set at the tertiary referral center. Participants  Data were acquired from healthy adults. Main Outcome Measures  The main outcome measures are principal curvature values (Kmin and Kmax) and global radius of curvature. Results  The CN was successfully extracted and rendered as a 3D surface in all cases. Significant curvatures of the CN in both histologic and radiographic reconstructions were found with global radius of curvature ranging from 2.08 to 8.5 mm. In addition, local curvature analysis revealed that the surface is highly complex. Conclusion  Detailed rendering of the human CN is feasible using histology and 3D MRI reconstruction and highlights complex surface topography that is not recapitulated by contemporary stiff ABI arrays. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory brain stem implant; cochlear nucleus; curvature; surface curvature

Year:  2019        PMID: 32206528      PMCID: PMC7082162          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  21 in total

1.  No easy target: anatomic constraints of electrodes interfacing the human cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Steffen K Rosahl; Sybille Rosahl
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Biomaterials. Electronic dura mater for long-term multimodal neural interfaces.

Authors:  Ivan R Minev; Pavel Musienko; Arthur Hirsch; Quentin Barraud; Nikolaus Wenger; Eduardo Martin Moraud; Jérôme Gandar; Marco Capogrosso; Tomislav Milekovic; Léonie Asboth; Rafael Fajardo Torres; Nicolas Vachicouras; Qihan Liu; Natalia Pavlova; Simone Duis; Alexandre Larmagnac; Janos Vörös; Silvestro Micera; Zhigang Suo; Grégoire Courtine; Stéphanie P Lacour
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Auditory Brainstem Implant Array Position Varies Widely Among Adult and Pediatric Patients and Is Associated With Perception.

Authors:  Samuel R Barber; Elliott D Kozin; Aaron K Remenschneider; Sidharth V Puram; Max Smith; Barbara S Herrmann; Mary E Cunnane; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Open set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant?

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Auditory brainstem implant candidacy in the United States in children 0-17 years old.

Authors:  Alyson B Kaplan; Elliott D Kozin; Sidharth V Puram; Maryanna S Owoc; Parth V Shah; A E Hight; Rosh K V Sethi; Aaron K Remenschneider; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 6.  Auditory brainstem implants for neurofibromatosis type 2.

Authors:  Liliana Colletti; Robert Shannon; Vittorio Colletti
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 7.  Systematic Review of Nontumor Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes.

Authors:  Kimberley S Noij; Elliott D Kozin; Rosh Sethi; Parth V Shah; Alyson B Kaplan; Barbara Herrmann; Aaron Remenschneider; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Outcomes following Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implant Surgery: Early Experiences in a North American Center.

Authors:  Sidharth V Puram; Samuel R Barber; Elliott D Kozin; Parth Shah; Aaron Remenschneider; Barbara S Herrmann; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Fred G Barker; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 9.  Electronic Dura Mater Meddling in the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Jocelyne Bloch; Stéphanie P Lacour; Grégoire Courtine
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 10.  Hearing Restoration with Auditory Brainstem Implant.

Authors:  Hirofumi Nakatomi; Satoru Miyawaki; Taichi Kin; Nobuhito Saito
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.742

View more
  1 in total

1.  Brainstem hyperintensity in patients with vestibular schwannoma is associated with labyrinth signal on magnetic resonance imaging but not vestibulocochlear tests.

Authors:  Bernardo Corrêa de Almeida Teixeira; Felipe Constanzo; Patricia Sens; Ricardo Ramina; Dante Luiz Escuissato
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-12-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.