OBJECTIVES: The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an option for hearing rehabilitation in profoundly deaf patients ineligible for cochlear implantation. Over the past decade, surgeons have begun implanting ABIs in pediatric patients who are unable to receive cochlear implants due to congenital or acquired malformations of the inner ear. No study has examined the potential population-level demand for ABIs in the United States (US). Herein, we aim to quantify the potential need for pediatric ABIs. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies detailing the rates of congenital cochlear and/or cochlear nerve (CN) anomalies. Absolute indications for ABI include bilateral cochlea or CN aplasia (Group A), and relative indications for ABI include bilateral cochlea or CN hypoplasia (Group B). Data was subsequently correlated to the US Census Bureau, the National Health Interview Survey, and the Gallaudet Research Institute to provide an estimation of pediatric ABI candidates. RESULTS: Eleven studies documented rates of bilateral findings. Bilateral cochlea aplasia was identified in 0-8.7% of patients and bilateral CN aplasia in 0-4.8% of patients (Group A). Bilateral cochlea hypoplasia was identified in 0-8.7% of patients and bilateral CN hypoplasia in 0-5.4% of patients (Group B). Using population-level sensorineural hearing loss data, we roughly estimate 2.1% of potential implant candidates meet absolute indications for an ABI in the United States. CONCLUSION: Congenital cochlear and cochlear nerve anomalies are exceedingly rare. This study provides the first preliminary estimate of cochlea and CN aplasia/hypoplasia at the population level albeit with limitations based on available data. These data suggest the need for dedicated ABI centers to focus expertise and management.
OBJECTIVES: The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an option for hearing rehabilitation in profoundly deaf patients ineligible for cochlear implantation. Over the past decade, surgeons have begun implanting ABIs in pediatric patients who are unable to receive cochlear implants due to congenital or acquired malformations of the inner ear. No study has examined the potential population-level demand for ABIs in the United States (US). Herein, we aim to quantify the potential need for pediatric ABIs. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies detailing the rates of congenital cochlear and/or cochlear nerve (CN) anomalies. Absolute indications for ABI include bilateral cochlea or CN aplasia (Group A), and relative indications for ABI include bilateral cochlea or CN hypoplasia (Group B). Data was subsequently correlated to the US Census Bureau, the National Health Interview Survey, and the Gallaudet Research Institute to provide an estimation of pediatric ABI candidates. RESULTS: Eleven studies documented rates of bilateral findings. Bilateral cochlea aplasia was identified in 0-8.7% of patients and bilateral CN aplasia in 0-4.8% of patients (Group A). Bilateral cochlea hypoplasia was identified in 0-8.7% of patients and bilateral CN hypoplasia in 0-5.4% of patients (Group B). Using population-level sensorineural hearing loss data, we roughly estimate 2.1% of potential implant candidates meet absolute indications for an ABI in the United States. CONCLUSION: Congenital cochlear and cochlear nerve anomalies are exceedingly rare. This study provides the first preliminary estimate of cochlea and CN aplasia/hypoplasia at the population level albeit with limitations based on available data. These data suggest the need for dedicated ABI centers to focus expertise and management.
Authors: Levent Sennaroglu; Vittorio Colletti; Manuel Manrique; Roland Laszig; Erwin Offeciers; Shakeel Saeed; Richard Ramsden; Sarp Sarac; Simon Freeman; Helge Rask Andersen; Andrzej Zarowski; Ibrahim Ziyal; Wolf-Peter Sollmann; Jan Kaminsky; Bartolomé Bejarano; Ahmet Atas; Gonca Sennaroglu; Esra Yucel; Sebnem Sevinc; Lilli Colletti; Alicia Huarte; Lise Henderson; Thomas Wesarg; Konrad Konradsson Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Isabelle Schrauwen; Elina Kari; Jacob Mattox; Lorida Llaci; Joanna Smeeton; Marcus Naymik; David W Raible; James A Knowles; J Gage Crump; Matthew J Huentelman; Rick A Friedman Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Luiz Ricardo Araújo Uchôa; Licia Pacheco Luna; Luis Arthur Brasil Gadelha Farias; Debora Lilian Nascimento Lima; Pablo Picasso de Araujo Coimbra Journal: J Radiol Case Rep Date: 2021-05-31
Authors: Laurel M Fisher; Laurie S Eisenberg; Mark Krieger; Eric P Wilkinson; Robert V Shannon Journal: Ther Innov Regul Sci Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 1.778
Authors: Osama Tarabichi; Vivek V Kanumuri; Julian Klug; Nicolas Vachicouras; Maria J Duarte; Lorenz Epprecht; Elliott D Kozin; Katherine Reinshagen; Stéphanie P Lacour; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2019-02-22
Authors: Laurie S Eisenberg; Dianne Hammes Ganguly; Amy S Martinez; Laurel M Fisher; Margaret E Winter; Jamie L Glater; Debra K Schrader; Janice Loggins; Eric P Wilkinson Journal: J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ Date: 2018-07-01
Authors: Kunal R Shetty; Sarah E Ridge; Vivek Kanumuri; Angela Zhu; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee Journal: World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2021-04-06