| Literature DB >> 32204364 |
Maciej Combrzyński1, Arkadiusz Matwijczuk2, Agnieszka Wójtowicz1, Tomasz Oniszczuk1, Dariusz Karcz3, Jarosław Szponar4, Agnieszka Niemczynowicz5, Dariusz Bober6, Marcin Mitrus1, Karol Kupryaniuk1, Mateusz Stasiak7, Bohdan Dobrzański8, Anna Oniszczuk9.
Abstract
Biodegradable materials are used in the manufacture of packaging and compostable films and various types of medical products. These have demonstrated high potential in medical applications: cardiac, vascular and orthopaedic conditions in adults as well in children. In our research, the extrusion-cooking technique was used to obtain environmentally friendly loose-fill foams as packaging. Potato starch was the basic raw material. Polyvinyl alcohol was used as an additive in the amount of 1%, 2% and 3% to replace starch. The components were mixed and moistened with water to various initial moisture contents of the blend (17%, 18% and 19%). The processing of starch foams employed the TS-45 single screw extruder-cooker (Gliwice, Poland) with the L/D ratio of 12. The foams were processed with various screw speeds (100 and 130 rpm) and with two types of forming dies (circular and ring die). The extrusion-cooking process efficiency (kg h-1) and the energy consumption (kWh kg-1) during the processing were also measured. The results showed that the processing efficiency of potato starch foams varied depending on the level of polyvinyl alcohol, the shape of the forming die and the screw speed applied. The analysis of energy consumption, mechanical properties and FTIR analyses demonstrated that the type of the forming die and the initial moisture level had the most significant impact on specific energy demands during the processing of potato starch-based foams.Entities:
Keywords: FTIR spectra; cutting force; ecological loose-fill packaging materials; extrusion-cooking; foams; process efficiency; resistance to compression
Year: 2020 PMID: 32204364 PMCID: PMC7143879 DOI: 10.3390/ma13061390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Obtained starch-based foams: (a) circular die and (b) ring die.
Figure 2Zwick type BDO-FBO0.5TH equipped with: (a) Warner–Bratzler’s knife and (b) compression flat plates.
Adequacy of two-variable model fit to tested characteristics of starch-based foams.
| Parameter | Forming Die | Screw Speed (rpm) | Model Fitted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency (kg h−1) | M1 | 100 | E = 41.118−2.119MC+1.510A+0.084MC2+0.005MCA−0.464A2 |
| 130 | E = 436.168−45.329MC+6.344A+1.296MC2−0.317MCA+0.136A2 | ||
| M2 | 100 | E = −48.549+7.922MC-3.726A-.204MC2+0.206MCA+0.036A2 | |
| 130 | E = −97.566+13.166MC+7.026A−0.336MC2−0.322MCA−0.136A2 | ||
| SME (kWh kg−1) | M1 | 100 | SME = 0.2007−0.0103MC+0.0271A+0.0002MC2−0.0018MCA+0.0016A2 |
| 130 | SME = −0.0154+0,0173MC+0.0368A−0.0006MC2−0.002MCA−0.0001A2 | ||
| M2 | 100 | SME = −1.0122+0.1293MC+0.0002A−0.0037MC2+0.0004MCA−0.0016A2 | |
| 130 | SME = 0.6545−0.051MC−0.0427A+0.0011MC2+0.0028MCA−0.0016A2 | ||
| Cutting force (N) | M1 | 100 | CF = −2028.02+263.12MC+53.84A-7.11MC2+3.87MCA−32.28A2 |
| 130 | CF = 2860.28−319.26MC+384.05A+9.46MC2−17.41MCA−4.60A2 | ||
| M2 | 100 | CF = −3592.86+430.68MC+92.52A−11.48MC2-2.02MCA−5.14A2 | |
| 130 | CF = -3275.19+392.57MC−229.01A-10.96MC2+14.09MCA+11.72A2 | ||
| Resistance for compression (MPa) | M1 | 100 | RC = −9553.83+1079.09MC+43.37A-28.33MC2−11.76MCA+9.15A2 |
| 130 | RC = −11425.17+1289.41MC−187.74A−34.59MC2+7.64MCA−14.04A2 | ||
| M2 | 100 | RC = -30643.98+3380.90MC+242.65A-90.84MC2−27.26MCA+36.21A2 | |
| 130 | RC = 8347.24−906.55MC−58.97A+26.16MC2−3.08MCA+11.93A2 |
M1—circular die; M2—ring die; MC—moisture content; A—additive level.
Figure 3Efficiency of starch foams extrusion with various amounts of PVA and the initial moisture content of raw materials processed with different forming dies at various screw speed: (a) M1-S1, (b) M1-S2, (c) M2-S1 and (d) M2-S2.
Statistical analysis of the effect of variation source and its interactions on starch-based foams processing efficiency (E).
| Variation Source | df | Sum of Squares | Mean Squares | F0 Test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 6 | 637.08 | 106.18 | 162.05 | <0.05 |
| M | 1 | 9786.55 | 9786.55 | 14936.30 | <0.05 |
| MC | 2 | 887.46 | 443.73 | 677.22 | <0.05 |
| S | 1 | 18315.90 | 18315.90 | 27953.90 | <0.05 |
| A*M | 6 | 162.12 | 27.02 | 41.24 | <0.05 |
| A*MC | 12 | 395.04 | 32.92 | 50.24 | <0.05 |
| A*S | 6 | 511.23 | 85.20 | 130.04 | <0.05 |
| M*MC | 2 | 7.71 | 3.85 | 5.88 | <0.05 |
| M*S | 1 | 454.97 | 454.97 | 694.38 | <0.05 |
| MC*S | 2 | 9.09 | 4.55 | 6.94 | <0.05 |
A—additive level; M—forming die; MC—moisture content; S—screw speed; df—degrees of freedom; p—significance value.
Figure 4Specific mechanical energy of starch foams extrusion with various amounts of PVA and the initial moisture content of raw materials processed with different forming dies at various screw speeds: (a) M1-S1, (b) M1-S2, (c) M2-S1 and (d) M2-S2.
Statistical analysis of the effect of variation source and its interactions on starch-based foams specific energy consumption (SME) during extrusion.
| Variation Source | df | Sum of Squares | Mean Squares | F0 test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 6 | 0.0042 | 0.0007 | 135.31 | <0.05 |
| M | 1 | 0.1026 | 0.1026 | 19669.70 | <0.05 |
| MC | 2 | 0.0308 | 0.0154 | 2955.75 | <0.05 |
| S | 1 | 0.0068 | 0.0068 | 1297.34 | <0.05 |
| A*M | 6 | 0.0285 | 0.0028 | 54.88 | <0.05 |
| A*MC | 12 | 0.0017 | 0.0001 | 56.09 | <0.05 |
| A*S | 6 | 0.0035 | 0.0003 | 99.17 | <0.05 |
| M*MC | 2 | 0.0025 | 0.0001 | 30.77 | <0.05 |
| M*S | 1 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 331.60 | <0.05 |
| MC*SS | 2 | 0.0002 | 0.0001 | 16.30 | <0.05 |
A—additive level; M—forming die; MC—moisture content; S—screw speed; df—degrees of freedom; p—significance value.
Figure 5Cutting force of starch foams extrusion with various amounts of PVA and the initial moisture content of raw materials processed with different forming dies at various screw speed: (a) M1-S1, (b) M1-S2, (c) M2-S1 and (d) M2-S2.
Statistical analysis of the effect of variation source and its interactions on the cutting force (CF) of starch-based foams.
| Variation Source | df | Sum of Squares | Mean Squares | F0 test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 6 | 20835591.86 | 3472598.64 | 842.40 | <0.05 |
| M | 1 | 16537802.65 | 16537802.65 | 4011.82 | <0.05 |
| MC | 2 | 44607.10 | 22303.55 | 5.41 | <0.05 |
| S | 1 | 398.41 | 398.41 | 0.10 | 0.76 |
| A*M | 6 | 1382125.77 | 230354.29 | 55.88 | <0.05 |
| A*MC | 12 | 328018.80 | 27334.90 | 6.63 | <0.05 |
| A*S | 6 | 805109.31 | 134184.88 | 32.55 | <0.05 |
| M*MC | 2 | 21191.76 | 10595.88 | 2.57 | 0.08 |
| M*S | 1 | 212836.72 | 212836.72 | 51.63 | <0.05 |
| MC*S | 2 | 42746.38 | 21373.19 | 5.18 | <0.05 |
A—additive level; M—forming die; MC—moisture content; S—screw speed; df—degrees of freedom; p—significance value.
Figure 6Resistance for the compression of starch foams extrusion with various amounts of PVA and the initial moisture content of raw materials processed with different forming dies at various screw speed: (a) M1-S1, (b) M1-S2, (c) M2-S1 and (d) M2-S2.
Statistical analysis of the effect of variation source and its interactions on resistance for the compression (RC) of starch-based foams.
| Variation Source | df | Sum of Squares | Mean Squares | F0 test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 6 | 44380113.23 | 7396685.54 | 976.75 | <0.05 |
| M | 1 | 1722479.66 | 1722479.66 | 227.46 | <0.05 |
| MC | 2 | 1864091.80 | 932045.90 | 123.08 | <0.05 |
| S | 1 | 2489633.17 | 2489633.17 | 328.76 | <0.05 |
| A*M | 6 | 1276493.15 | 212748.86 | 28.09 | <0.05 |
| A*MC | 12 | 498540.48 | 41545.04 | 5.49 | <0.05 |
| A*S | 6 | 810771.30 | 135128.55 | 17.84 | <0.05 |
| M*MC | 2 | 148377.25 | 74188.63 | 9.8 | <0.05 |
| M*S | 1 | 678894.86 | 678894.86 | 89.65 | <0.05 |
| MC*S | 2 | 164722.48 | 82361.24 | 10.88 | <0.05 |
A—additive level; M—forming die; MC—moisture content; S—screw speed; df—degrees of freedom; p—significance value.
Figure 7M1 extrudate with different PVA content, panel (A)—A1, panel (B)—A2 and panel (C)—A3.
Location of peaks of FTIR absorption spectra with the corresponding vibrations for materials selected for tests (biodegradable) over the 3800–550 cm−1 spectrum range.
| Position o Maximum (cm−1) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 S1 | M2 S1 | M1 S1 | M2 S1 | Type of Vibrations | ||||
| A1 | A2 | A3 | A1 | A2 | A3 | |||
| 3308 | 3308 | 3315 | 3304 | 3304 | 3317 | 3307 | 3300 | ν(-OH) with absorber water |
| 2925 | 2925 | 2924 | 2929 | 2925 | 2927 | 2927 | 2926 | νst(C-H) and ν(C-H) in CH2 / CH3 group |
| 2887 | 2887 | 2889 | 2890 | 2884 | 2887 | 2886 | 2885 | |
| 1742/5 | 1742/5 | 1742/5 | 1742/5 | 1742/5 | 1742/5 | 1742/5 | 1742/5 | ν(C=O) |
| 1647 | 1645 | 1647 | 1643 | 1645 | 1645 | 1647 | 1640 | δm(O-H) (absorber water) |
| nd | nd | 1591 | 1610 | nd | nd | 1609 | Nd | δ(C-H) or δ(CH2) in plane |
| 1417 | 1418 | 1413 | 1415 | 1420 | 1417 | 1417 | 1415 | C-H bending and wagging or δ(COH) |
| 1363 | 1363 | 1365 | 1365 | 1363 | 1367 | 1360 | 1363 | |
| 1241 | 1239 | 1238 | 1231 | 1235 | 1240 | 1241 | 1242 | δ(O-H) or C-O |
| 1148 | 1147 | 1148 | 1149 | 1149 | 1149 | 1147 | 1147 | anhydroglucose ring C–O stretch of C–O–H in starch and C-O-C antisymmetric bridge |
| 1077 | 1078 | 1077 | 1078 | 1078 | 1078 | 1078 | 1078 | |
| 990 | 990 | 992 | 992 | 992 | 993 | 992 | 992 | ν (C-O) and ν(C-O-C or C-O-H) |
| 927 | 927 | 929 | 928 | 928 | 927 | 928 | 928 | ν (C-C) and ν (C-O) or C-O-C bend or O-H deformation |
| 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | |
| 757 | 760 | 760 | 760 | 760 | 760 | 760 | 760 | |
| 757 | 760 | 760 | 760 | 760 | 760 | 760 | 760 | |
ν—stretching, δ—deformation, s—symmetric, as –asymmetric, st—strong, m—medium, nd—no data.
Figure 8The scattered scores plot (PC1 × PC2 × PC3) based on FTIR spectra of M1 with various PVA addition.
Figure 9The loading factors of the principal component analysis (PCA).