Literature DB >> 32201437

BALANCING DOCUMENTATION AND DIRECT PATIENT CARE ACTIVITIES: A STUDY OF A MATURE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD SYSTEM.

Amirmasoud Momenipur1, Priyadarshini R Pennathur1.   

Abstract

US hospitals now fully embrace electronic documentation systems as a way to reduce medical errors and improve patient safety outcomes. Whether spending time on electronic documentation detracts from the time available for direct patient care, however, is still unresolved. There is no knowledge on the permanent effects of documenting electronically and whether it takes away significant time from patient care when the healthcare information system is mature. To understand the time spent on documentation, direct patient care tasks, and other clinical tasks in a mature information system, we conducted an observational and interview study in a midwestern academic hospital. The hospital implemented an electronic medical record system 11 years ago. We observed 22 health care workers across intensive care units, inpatient floors, and an outpatient clinic in the hospital. Results show that healthcare workers spend more time on documentation activities compared to patient care activities. Clinical roles have no influence on the time spent on documentation. This paper describes results on the time spent between documentation and patient care tasks, and discusses implications for future practice. RELEVANCE TO INDUSTRY: The study applies to healthcare industry that faces immense challenges in balancing documentation activities and patient care activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Documentation; balance; electronic health records; health information technology; patient care; time

Year:  2019        PMID: 32201437      PMCID: PMC7083584          DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2019.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon        ISSN: 0169-8141            Impact factor:   2.656


  29 in total

1.  Are electronic medical records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and duplication.

Authors:  Kenric W Hammond; Susan T Helbig; Craig C Benson; Beverly M Brathwaite-Sketoe
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

2.  The influence of integrated electronic medical records and computerized nursing notes on nurses' time spent in documentation.

Authors:  Tracy Yee; Jack Needleman; Marjorie Pearson; Patricia Parkerton; Melissa Parkerton; Joelle Wolstein
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Assessing the impact of electronic health records as an enabler of hospital quality and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Benjamin Jarvis; Tricia Johnson; Peter Butler; Kathryn O'Shaughnessy; Francis Fullam; Lac Tran; Richa Gupta
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Quantifying clinical narrative redundancy in an electronic health record.

Authors:  Jesse O Wrenn; Daniel M Stein; Suzanne Bakken; Peter D Stetson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  The impact of health information technology on the quality of medical and health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aziz Jamal; Kirsten McKenzie; Michele Clark
Journal:  Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.185

6.  Paperwork versus patient care: a nationwide survey of residents' perceptions of clinical documentation requirements and patient care.

Authors:  Melissa A Christino; Andrew P Matson; Staci A Fischer; Steven E Reinert; Christopher W Digiovanni; Paul D Fadale
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-12

7.  Time spent on clinical documentation: a survey of internal medicine residents and program directors.

Authors:  Amy S Oxentenko; Colin P West; Carol Popkave; Steven E Weinberger; Joseph C Kolars
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-22

8.  Time spent in face-to-face patient care and work outside the examination room.

Authors:  Andrew Gottschalk; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Time Requirements for Electronic Health Record Use in an Academic Ophthalmology Center.

Authors:  Sarah Read-Brown; Michelle R Hribar; Leah G Reznick; Lorinna H Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Winston D Chamberlain; Steven T Bailey; Jessica B Wallace; Thomas R Yackel; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 7.389

10.  Computerized clinical documentation system in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  J A Menke; C W Broner; D Y Campbell; M Y McKissick; J A Edwards-Beckett
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2001-09-17       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Creator-Consumer Information Interaction Behaviors in Healthcare Documentation Systems.

Authors:  Priyadarshini R Pennathur
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Implementing Best Practices to Redesign Workflow and Optimize Nursing Documentation in the Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Mary R Lindsay; Kay Lytle
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.762

3.  Time-motion examination of electronic health record utilization and clinician workflows indicate frequent task switching and documentation burden.

Authors:  Amanda J Moy; Jessica M Schwartz; Jonathan Elias; Seemab Imran; Eugene Lucas; Kenrick D Cato; Sarah Collins Rossetti
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.