| Literature DB >> 33936464 |
Amanda J Moy1, Jessica M Schwartz2, Jonathan Elias1,3, Seemab Imran3, Eugene Lucas1,3, Kenrick D Cato2,4, Sarah Collins Rossetti1,2.
Abstract
Clinical documentation burden has been broadly acknowledged, yet few interprofessional measures of burden exist. Using interprofessional time-motion study (TMS) data, we evaluated clinical workflows with a focus on electronic health record (EHR) utilization and fragmentation among 47 clinicians: 34 advanced practice providers (APPs) and 13 registered nurses (RNs) from: an acute care unit (n=15 observations [obs]), intensive care unit (nobs=14), ambulatory clinic (nobs=3), and emergency department (nobs=15). We examined workflow fragmentation, task-switch type, and task involvement. In our study, clinicians on average exhibited 1.4±0.6 switches per minute in their workflow. Eighty-four (19.6%) of the 429 task-switch types presented in the data accounted for 80.1% of all switches. Among those, data viewing- and data entry-related tasks were involved in 48.2% of all switches, indicating documentation burden may play a critical role in workflow disruptions. Therefore, interruption rate evaluated through task switches may serve as a proxy for measuring burden. ©2020 AMIA - All rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33936464 PMCID: PMC8075533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc ISSN: 1559-4076