Literature DB >> 26055822

Radiation Exposure during the Evaluation and Management of Nephrolithiasis.

Tony T Chen1, Chu Wang2, Michael N Ferrandino3, Charles D Scales3, Terry T Yoshizumi4, Glenn M Preminger3, Michael E Lipkin5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is rising concern over the increasing amount of patient radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging and medical procedures. Patients with nephrolithiasis are at potentially significant risk for radiation exposure due to the need for imaging to manage recurrent stone disease. We reviewed the literature in an attempt to better characterize actual risks and discussed methods to reduce radiation exposure for adult patients with nephrolithiasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed search was performed using the key words nephrolithiasis, stones, radiation, fluoroscopy, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, computerized tomography and shock wave lithotripsy. Additional citations were identified by reviewing reference lists of pertinent articles.
RESULTS: A total of 50 relevant articles were included in this review. Patients with a first time acute stone event are exposed to a significant amount of radiation. Most radiation is from computerized tomography. Patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy are exposed to an equal or greater amount of radiation than they received from computerized tomography. Risk factors for increased exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy include obesity, multiple tracts and a larger stone burden. Ureteroscopy exposes patients to approximately the same amount of radiation as plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder. Risk factors for increased exposure during ureteroscopy include obesity and ureteral dilation. During shock wave lithotripsy the amount of radiation exposure is not well characterized. Interventions to reduce exposure to patients include using ultrasound when possible and implementing low dose computerized tomography protocols. The as low as reasonably achievable principle of radiation exposure should always be followed when fluoroscopy is performed. The use of an air retrograde pyelogram may also reduce exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Fluoroscopy time during ureteroscopy may be decreased by a laser guided C-arm, a dedicated C-arm technician, stent placement under direct vision and tactile feedback to help guide wire placement.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with nephrolithiasis are at significant risk for increased radiation exposure from the imaging and fluoroscopy used during treatment. The true risks of low radiation exposure remain uncertain. It is important to be aware of these risks to provide better counseling for patients. Urologists must also be familiar with techniques to decrease radiation exposure for patients with nephrolithiasis.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic imaging; fluoroscopy; kidney; nephrolithiasis; radiation dosage

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26055822     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

1.  Bayesian comparative assessment of diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT scan and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of urolithiasis after the application of the STONE score.

Authors:  Laila Cochon; Jeffrey Smith; Amado Alejandro Baez
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25

2.  Adopting Ultrasound Guidance for Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Evaluating the Learning Curve for the Experienced Surgeon.

Authors:  Manint Usawachintachit; Selma Masic; Isabel E Allen; Jianxing Li; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Pulsed versus continuous mode fluoroscopy during PCNL: safety and effectiveness comparison in a case series study.

Authors:  Otas Durutovic; Zoran Dzamic; Bogomir Milojevic; Predrag Nikic; Ana Mimic; Uros Bumbasirevic; Aleksandar Vuksanovic; Dragica Milenkovic Petronic; Athanasios Papatsoris; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Computed Tomography Radiation Exposure Among Referred Kidney Stone Patients: Results from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter.

Authors:  David T Tzou; Samuel Zetumer; Manint Usawachintachit; Kazumi Taguchi; Seth K Bechis; Brian D Duty; Jonathan D Harper; Ryan S Hsi; Mathew Sorensen; Roger L Sur; Shalonda Reliford-Titus; Helena C Chang; Dylan Isaacson; David B Bayne; Zhen J Wang; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Imaging in the diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Colleran; Michael J Callahan; Harriet J Paltiel; Caleb P Nelson; Bartley G Cilento; Michelle A Baum; Jeanne S Chow
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04

Review 6.  Urolithiasis: evaluation, dietary factors, and medical management: an update of the 2014 SIU-ICUD international consultation on stone disease.

Authors:  Helene Jung; Sero Andonian; Dean Assimos; Timothy Averch; Petrisor Geavlete; Yasuo Kohjimoto; Andreas Neisius; Joe Philip; Alberto Saita; Hemendra Shah; Palle Jörn Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Ultrasound Guidance Reduces Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Cost Compared to Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Matthew Hudnall; Manint Usawachintachit; Ian Metzler; David T Tzou; Brittany Harrison; Errol Lobo; Thomas Chi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Lifetime Radiation Exposure in Patients with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Mohamed A Elkoushy; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Is the Economic Impact and Utilization of Imaging Studies for Pediatric Urolithiasis Across the United States Increasing?

Authors:  Brian J Young; Rohit Tejwani; Hsin-Hsiao S Wang; Steven Wolf; J Todd Purves; John S Wiener; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  [Update of the 2Sk guidelines on the diagnostics, treatment and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF register number 043-025) : What is new?]

Authors:  C Seitz; T Bach; M Bader; W Berg; T Knoll; A Neisius; C Netsch; M Nothacker; S Schmidt; M Schönthaler; R Siener; R Stein; M Straub; W Strohmaier; C Türk; B Volkmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.