Elizabeth L Norton1, Whitney E Hornsby2, Xiaoting Wu3, Brooke N Wolford4, Sarah E Graham2, Cristen J Willer5, Bo Yang6. 1. Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Neb. 2. University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich. 3. University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich. 4. University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. 5. University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. Electronic address: cristen@umich.edu. 6. University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich. Electronic address: boya@med.umich.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate aortic disease progression and reintervention after an initial thoracic aortic dissection in pathogenic variant carriers. METHODS: Of 175 participants diagnosed with thoracic aortic dissection, 31 had a pathogenic variant (pathogenic group) across 6 genes (COL3A1, FBN1, LOX, PRKG1, SMAD3, TGFBR2) identified by whole exome sequencing. Those with benign or normal variants (benign/normal group, n = 144) comprised the control group. Clinical data were collected through medical record review (1985-2018) and supplemented with the National Death Index database (December 2018). RESULTS: The entire cohort (n = 175) consisted of 108 type A aortic dissections and 67 type B aortic dissections, similarly distributed between groups. The pathogenic group was significantly younger (43 vs 56 years, P < .0001) and had significantly more aortic root replacements and similar extents of arch replacement at initial type A aortic dissection repair. The median follow-up time was 7.5 (4.6-12) years. After initial treatment, the pathogenic group required significantly more aortic reinterventions (median 1 vs 0, P < .0001) and mean cumulative aortic reinterventions for each patient (10 years: 1 vs 0.5, P = .029). Both incidence rate (12%/year vs 1.2%/year, P = .0001) and cumulative incidence of reinterventions (9 years: 70% vs 6%, P < .0001) for the preserved native aortic root were significantly higher in the pathogenic group, but were similar for the preserved native aortic arch and distal aorta between groups. Ten-year survival was similar in the pathogenic and benign/normal groups (92% vs 85%). CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive aortic root replacement and similar arch management should be considered in pathogenic variant carriers at initial type A aortic dissection repair compared with benign/normal variant carriers.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate aortic disease progression and reintervention after an initial thoracic aortic dissection in pathogenic variant carriers. METHODS: Of 175 participants diagnosed with thoracic aortic dissection, 31 had a pathogenic variant (pathogenic group) across 6 genes (COL3A1, FBN1, LOX, PRKG1, SMAD3, TGFBR2) identified by whole exome sequencing. Those with benign or normal variants (benign/normal group, n = 144) comprised the control group. Clinical data were collected through medical record review (1985-2018) and supplemented with the National Death Index database (December 2018). RESULTS: The entire cohort (n = 175) consisted of 108 type A aortic dissections and 67 type B aortic dissections, similarly distributed between groups. The pathogenic group was significantly younger (43 vs 56 years, P < .0001) and had significantly more aortic root replacements and similar extents of arch replacement at initial type A aortic dissection repair. The median follow-up time was 7.5 (4.6-12) years. After initial treatment, the pathogenic group required significantly more aortic reinterventions (median 1 vs 0, P < .0001) and mean cumulative aortic reinterventions for each patient (10 years: 1 vs 0.5, P = .029). Both incidence rate (12%/year vs 1.2%/year, P = .0001) and cumulative incidence of reinterventions (9 years: 70% vs 6%, P < .0001) for the preserved native aortic root were significantly higher in the pathogenic group, but were similar for the preserved native aortic arch and distal aorta between groups. Ten-year survival was similar in the pathogenic and benign/normal groups (92% vs 85%). CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive aortic root replacement and similar arch management should be considered in pathogenic variant carriers at initial type A aortic dissection repair compared with benign/normal variant carriers.
Authors: Elena Gallo MacFarlane; Sarah J Parker; Joseph Y Shin; Benjamin E Kang; Shira G Ziegler; Tyler J Creamer; Rustam Bagirzadeh; Djahida Bedja; Yichun Chen; Juan F Calderon; Katherine Weissler; Pamela A Frischmeyer-Guerrerio; Mark E Lindsay; Jennifer P Habashi; Harry C Dietz Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Bo Yang; Elizabeth L Norton; Reilly Hobbs; Linda Farhat; Xiaoting Wu; Whitney E Hornsby; Karen M Kim; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Bo Yang; Elizabeth L Norton; Terry Shih; Linda Farhat; Xiaoting Wu; Whitney E Hornsby; Karen M Kim; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Marjolijn Renard; Catherine Francis; Rajarshi Ghosh; Alan F Scott; P Dane Witmer; Lesley C Adès; Gregor U Andelfinger; Pauline Arnaud; Catherine Boileau; Bert L Callewaert; Dongchuan Guo; Nadine Hanna; Mark E Lindsay; Hiroko Morisaki; Takayuki Morisaki; Nicholas Pachter; Leema Robert; Lut Van Laer; Harry C Dietz; Bart L Loeys; Dianna M Milewicz; Julie De Backer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bartosz Rylski; Joseph E Bavaria; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Emanuela Branchetti; Nimesh D Desai; Rita K Milewski; Wilson Y Szeto; Prashanth Vallabhajosyula; Matthias Siepe; Fabian A Kari Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dong-chuan Guo; Ellen S Regalado; Limin Gong; Xueyan Duan; Regie Lyn P Santos-Cortez; Pauline Arnaud; Zhao Ren; Bo Cai; Ellen M Hostetler; Rocio Moran; David Liang; Anthony Estrera; Hazim J Safi; Suzanne M Leal; Michael J Bamshad; Jay Shendure; Deborah A Nickerson; Guillaume Jondeau; Catherine Boileau; Dianna M Milewicz Journal: Circ Res Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Kuan-Han H Wu; Whitney E Hornsby; Bethany Klunder; Amelia Krause; Anisa Driscoll; John Kulka; Ryan Bickett-Hickok; Austin Fellows; Sarah Graham; Erin O Kaleba; Salim S Hayek; Xu Shi; Nadia R Sutton; Nicholas Douville; Bhramar Mukherjee; Kenneth Jamerson; Chad M Brummett; Cristen J Willer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Adelyn Beil; Whitney Hornsby; Cristen Willer; J Scott Roberts; Wendy R Uhlmann; Rajani Aatre; Patricia Arscott; Brooke Wolford; Kim A Eagle; Bo Yang; Jennifer McNamara Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.063