Literature DB >> 33648514

Disclosure of clinically actionable genetic variants to thoracic aortic dissection biobank participants.

Adelyn Beil1, Whitney Hornsby2, Cristen Willer3,4,5, J Scott Roberts6,7, Wendy R Uhlmann2,8,9, Rajani Aatre2, Patricia Arscott2, Brooke Wolford10, Kim A Eagle2, Bo Yang11, Jennifer McNamara2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disclosure of pathogenic variants to thoracic aortic dissection biobank participants was implemented. The impact and costs, including confirmatory genetic testing in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory, were evaluated.
METHODS: We exome sequenced 240 cases with thoracic aortic dissection and 258 controls, then examined 11 aortopathy genes. Pathogenic variants in 6 aortopathy genes (COL3A1, FBN1, LOX, PRKG1, SMAD3, and TGFBR2) were identified in 26 participants, representing 10.8% of the cohort (26/240). A second research sample was used to validate the initial findings. Mailed letters to participants disclosed that a potentially disease causing DNA alteration had been identified (neither the gene nor variant was disclosed). Participants were offered clinical genetic counseling and confirmatory genetic testing in a CLIA laboratory.
RESULTS: Excluding 6 participants who were deceased or lost to follow-up, 20 participants received the disclosure letter, 10 of whom proceeded with genetic counseling, confirmatory genetic testing, and enrolled in a survey study. Participants reported satisfaction with the letter (4.2 ± 0.7) and genetic counseling (4.4 ± 0.4; [out of 5, respectively]). The psychosocial impact was characterized by low decisional regret (11.5 ± 11.6) and distress (16.0 ± 4.2, [out of 100, respectively]). The average cost for 26 participants was $400, including validation and sending letters. The average cost for those who received genetic counseling and CLIA laboratory confirmation was $605.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants were satisfied with the return of clinically significant biobank genetic results and CLIA laboratory testing; however, the process required significant time and resources. These findings illustrate the trade-offs involved for researchers considering returning research genetic results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biobank; Communication; Genetic counseling; Pathogenic variants; Return of results

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33648514      PMCID: PMC7923508          DOI: 10.1186/s12920-021-00902-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genomics        ISSN: 1755-8794            Impact factor:   3.063


  26 in total

1.  2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine.

Authors:  Loren F Hiratzka; George L Bakris; Joshua A Beckman; Robert M Bersin; Vincent F Carr; Donald E Casey; Kim A Eagle; Luke K Hermann; Eric M Isselbacher; Ella A Kazerooni; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Bruce W Lytle; Dianna M Milewicz; David L Reich; Souvik Sen; Julie A Shinn; Lars G Svensson; David M Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Kyle B Brothers; Sara Fitzgerald-Butt; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Leila Jamal; Cynthia A James; Gail P Jarvik; Jennifer B McCormick; Tanya N Nelson; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Julie Richer; Emmanuelle Souzeau; Jason L Vassy; Jennifer K Wagner; Howard P Levy
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: interest, impact, and demands on researchers.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; J Scott Roberts; David I Shalowitz; Jessica N Everett; Scott Y H Kim; Leon Raskin; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Validation of a decision regret scale.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Annette M O'Connor; Timothy J Wood; Thomas F Hack; Laura Siminoff; Elisa Gordon; Deb Feldman-Stewart
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Preferences for Return of Genetic Results Among Participants in the Jackson Heart Study and Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Steven Joffe; Deborah E Sellers; Lynette Ekunwe; Donna Antoine-Lavigne; Sarah McGraw; Daniel Levy; Greta Lee Splansky
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2019-11-22

6.  Clinical Implications of Identifying Pathogenic Variants in Individuals With Thoracic Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Brooke N Wolford; Whitney E Hornsby; Dongchuan Guo; Wei Zhou; Maoxuan Lin; Linda Farhat; Jennifer McNamara; Anisa Driscoll; Xiaoting Wu; Ellen M Schmidt; Elizabeth L Norton; Michael R Mathis; Santhi K Ganesh; Nicholas J Douville; Chad M Brummett; Jacob Kitzman; Y Eugene Chen; Karen Kim; G Michael Deeb; Himanshu Patel; Kim A Eagle; Dianna M Milewicz; Cristen J Willer; Bo Yang
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2019-06-18

7.  A survey of aortic disease biorepository participants' preferences for return of research genetic results.

Authors:  Jamie Love-Nichols; Wendy R Uhlmann; Patricia Arscott; Cristen Willer; Whitney Hornsby; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.717

8.  Return of genetic and genomic research findings: experience of a pediatric biorepository.

Authors:  Tanya Papaz; Eriskay Liston; Laura Zahavich; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; Rebekah K Jobling; Raymond H Kim; Miriam Reuter; Anastasia Miron; Erwin Oechslin; Tapas Mondal; Lynn Bergin; John F Smythe; Luis Altamirano-Diaz; Jane Lougheed; Roderick Yao; Oyediran Akinrinade; Jeroen Breckpot; Seema Mital
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Kara N Maxwell; Laura DiGiovanni; Jamie Brower; Dominique Fetzer; Jill Bennett Gaieski; Amanda Brandt; Danielle McKenna; Jessica Long; Jacquelyn Powers; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16

10.  Returning genomic results in a Federally Qualified Health Center: the intersection of precision medicine and social determinants of health.

Authors:  Gabriel Q Shaibi; Iftikhar J Kullo; Davinder P Singh; Valentina Hernandez; Richard R Sharp; Idali Cuellar; Eleanna De Filippis; Sharon Levey; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Lawrence J Mandarino; Ping Yang; Stephen N Thibodeau; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Returning actionable genomic results in a research biobank: Analytic validity, clinical implementation, and resource utilization.

Authors:  Carrie L Blout Zawatsky; Nidhi Shah; Kalotina Machini; Emma Perez; Kurt D Christensen; Hana Zouk; Marcie Steeves; Christopher Koch; Melissa Uveges; Janelle Shea; Nina Gold; Joel Krier; Natalie Boutin; Lisa Mahanta; Heidi L Rehm; Scott T Weiss; Elizabeth W Karlson; Jordan W Smoller; Matthew S Lebo; Robert C Green
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A Novel Human Biospecimen Repository for Clinical and Molecular Investigation of Thoracic Aortopathy.

Authors:  Courtney E Vujakovich; Benjamin J Landis
Journal:  Cardiogenetics       Date:  2021-09-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.