| Literature DB >> 32197662 |
Chien-An Shih1,2,3, I-Ming Jou4,5, Pei-Yuan Lee6, Chin-Li Lu7, Wei-Ren Su2,8,9, Ming-Long Yeh1,9, Po-Ting Wu10,11,12,13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of locking plate in lateral malleolar fracture fixation for the elderly remains unclear. The aim of our study is to compare radiological and functional outcomes in older patients (> 50 years) with AO/OTA 44B lateral malleolar fractures after locking plate (PLP) or one-third non-locking tubular plate (TP) lateral fixation.Entities:
Keywords: Ankle fracture; Fibula fracture; Locking plate; Non-locking plate; Osteoarthritis; Outcomes
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32197662 PMCID: PMC7082938 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01622-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1The two low-profile and anatomical periarticular locking plates used in this study
Fig. 2A 64-year-old woman treated using an interfragmentary screw and an Aplus PLP. a The fracture was well-reduced (immediately postoperative radiograph). b It was united without shortening, further displacement, or changes in OA grade
Fig. 3This 78-year-old woman was treated with an interfragmentary screw and a TP. During securing of the interfragmentary screw, the far cortex was cracked, and absolute stability was not achieved. The fibula length could not be anatomically maintained using a TP that was not a fixed angle device. a Finally, the reduction accuracy was fair (immediately postoperative radiograph). b One year later, it was malunited (the medial ankle-joint substantially widened), the OA grade worsened (arrowheads), and all distal screws were loosened
Patient demographics and baseline clinical characteristics
| PLP | TP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Sex | 1.000a | ||
| Male | 10 | 11 | |
| Female | 24 | 27 | |
| Side with lesion | 0.815a | ||
| Left | 14 | 17 | |
| Right | 20 | 21 | |
| Age (years) | 63.7 ± 7.9 | 60.2 ± 7.0 | 0.065b |
| Operation time (min) | 94.7 ± 32.3 | 80.8 ± 21.7 | 0.030b* |
| Injury to fixation (days) | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 1.7 | 0.453b |
| Hospitalization duration (days) | 4.4 ± 2.0 | 4.0 ± 1.8 | 0.432b |
| Energy of trauma | 1.000a | ||
| High | 21 | 23 | |
| Low | 13 | 15 | |
| Body mass index (BMI) | 26.1 ± 4.0 | 24.6 ± 2.7 | 0.086b |
| Fracture type | 0.643a | ||
| Unimalleolar | 7 | 12 | |
| Bimalleolar | 18 | 18 | |
| Trimalleolar | 9 | 8 | |
| Comminuted fracture | 2/34 | 4/38 | 0.677a |
| Comorbidities | |||
| Diabetes (n) | 8/34 | 5/38 | 0.359a |
| Hypertension (n) | 6/34 | 4/38 | 0.501a |
| Renal disease (n) | 3/34 | 3/38 | 1.000a |
| Osteoporosis | 24/34 | 27/38 | 1.000a |
| Initial OA grade [ | 0.306a | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 26 | 24 | |
| 2 | 8 | 14 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Initial talus tilt angle (TTA) | 1.000a | ||
| ≥ 2° | 2 | 3 | |
| < 2° | 32 | 35 | |
| Initial distal fibula length (mm) | 27.4 ± 3.4 | 27.3 ± 2.8 | 0.973b |
| Reduction accuracy [ | 1.000a | ||
| Good | 31 | 35 | |
| Fair | 3 | 3 | |
| Poor | 0 | 0 |
aFisher’s exact test, bMann-Whitney U test, *p < 0.05
One-year clinical and functional outcomes
| PLP | TP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Time to union (months) | 5.0 ± 1.8 | 4.9 ± 1.8 | 0.742a |
| Union rate [ | 34 (100%) | 38 (100%) | 1.000b |
| FAOS subscale at 1 year | |||
| Pain (0–100) | 91.3 ± 7.0 | 86.1 ± 5.8 | < 0.001a*** |
| Symptom (0–100) | 81.9 ± 9.9 | 76.7 ± 12.8 | 0.036a* |
| ADL (0–100) | 94.7 ± 4.7 | 89.6 ± 5.5 | < 0.001a*** |
| Sports (0–100) | 85.6 ± 8.0 | 80.9 ± 9.9 | 0.040a* |
| QoL (0–100) | 77.6 ± 10.4 | 70.4 ± 9.8 | 0.005a** |
| Total scores (0–500) | 431.1 ± 31.2 | 403.7 ± 38.1 | 0.002a** |
| VAS at 1 year (0–10) | 1.2 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 1.2 | < 0.001a*** |
| Complications | |||
| Delayed wound healing ( | 2/34 | 2/38 | 1.000b |
| Superficial infection ( | 1/34 | 1/38 | 1.000b |
| Deep infection ( | 0/34 | 0/38 | 1.000b |
| Others ( | 0/34 | 0/38 | 1.000b |
| Implant removal rate | 6/34 | 16/38 | 0.039b* |
aMann-Whitney U test, bFisher’s exact test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Radiographic parameters comparison immediately and 1 year after surgery
| PLP ( | TP ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | T1-T0 (ΔT) | T0 | T1 | T1-T0 (ΔT) | ||
| Distal fibula length (mm) [mean (SD)] | 27.0 (3.4) | 26.4 (3.0) | 1.1 (1.1) | 26.8 (3.1) | 25.4 (3.0) | 1.9 (1.3) | 0.002a,c** |
| Talus tilt angle ≥ 2° [ | 2 (5.9%) | 4 (11.8%) | 2 (5.9%) | 3 (7.9%) | 13 (34.2%) | 10 (26.3%) | 0.027b,c* |
| Fibula shortening (> 2 mm) [ | 0 | 5 (14.7%) | 5 (14.7%) | 0 | 16 (42.1%) | 16 (42.1%) | 0.018b,c* |
| Proximal screw loosening [ | 0 | 2 (5.3%) | 0.495b,d | ||||
| Distal screw loosening [ | 0 | 14 (36.8%) | < 0.001b,d*** | ||||
T0 immediately after surgery, T1 1 year after surgery
aMann-Whitney U test, bFisher’s exact test, cPLP(ΔT) vs. TP(ΔT), dPLP(T1) vs. TP(T1),*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Radiographic OA grade comparison immediately and 1 year after surgery
| PLP ( | TP ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | T0 | T1 | ||
| OA grade [ | |||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 26 (76.5%) | 22 (61.8%) | 24 (63.1%) | 8 (21.1%) | |
| 2 | 8 (23.5%) | 12 (32.3%) | 14 (36.9%) | 25 (65.8%) | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (13.1%) | |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| OA grade progression (T1-T0, ΔT) [ | < 0.001*** | ||||
| 0 | 29 (85.3%) | 17 (44.7%) | |||
| 1 | 5 (14.7%) | 21 (52.6%) | |||
| 2 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 4 | 0 | 0 | |||
T0 immediately after surgery, T1 1 year after surgery, ΔT (T1-T0): Changes 1 year after surgery; ***p < 0.001 (Fisher’s exact test)
Stepwise multiple regression analysis of 1-year FAOS total scores and VAS scores in patients with lateral malleolar fracture (n = 72)
| FAOS total score coefficients | VAS coefficients | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients (SE) | a | Coefficients (SE) | a | |||||
| Renal disease (yes vs. no) | − 27.24 (12.46) | − 2.84 | 0.53 | 0.018* | - | |||
| OA grade (0–4) | − 18.56 (6.06) | − 3.22 | 0.53 | 0.002** | 0.52 (0.20) | 2.30 | 0.40 | 0.011* |
| Distal screw loosening ( | − 15.73 (3.22) | − 4.73 | 0.53 | < 0.001*** | 0.47 (0.11) | 3.33 | 0.40 | < 0.001*** |
| Talus tilt angle (≥ 2° vs. < 2°) | − 15.79 (7.45) | − 2.12 | 0.53 | 0.038* | 0.53 (0.26) | 2.17 | 0.40 | 0.043* |
aR adjusted R coefficient, SE standard error
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001