Literature DB >> 24077867

Locking versus non-locking neutralization plates for treatment of lateral malleolar fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Sachiyuki Tsukada, Masaki Otsuji, Akira Shiozaki, Asako Yamamoto, Shuro Komatsu, Hideya Yoshimura, Hiroo Ikeda, Akiho Hoshino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The reduction of periosteal compression through the use of a locking plate may minimize disturbances of bone blood supply and may improve the rate of bone union. A single-centre, assessor blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the clinical effectiveness of a locking plate and a non-locking plate.
METHODS: A total of 52 patients with AO/OTA 44B lateral malleolar fractures were included in this study. All patients underwent surgical fixation using a lag screw and neutralization plate. An identical treatment protocol was used in all patients, with exception of plate selection. The rate of radiographic bone union, defined as the complete disappearance of fracture lines confirmed through anteroposterior, lateral, and internal oblique views was compared at three, six, and 12 months following surgery. In addition, the Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, the time required for resolution of tenderness at the fracture site and the complication rate were evaluated.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were randomly assigned to undergo fixation using a locking plate, and 29 patients were assigned to undergo fixation using a non-locking plate. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference in the radiographic bone union rate of fibula, SF-36 score, the time for resolution of tenderness at the fracture site and complication rates.
CONCLUSION: No differences were observed in patients with AO/OTA 44B lateral malleolar fractures undergoing fixation with a locking versus non-locking neutralization plate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077867      PMCID: PMC3843202          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2109-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology.

Authors:  Stephan M Perren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

2.  Fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: A biomechanical comparison of locking versus conventional plates.

Authors:  Todd Kim; Ugur M Ayturk; Andrew Haskell; Theodore Miclau; Christian M Puttlitz
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.286

Review 3.  Locking plates: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Wade R Smith; Bruce H Ziran; Jeff O Anglen; Philip F Stahel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan.

Authors:  S Fukuhara; S Bito; J Green; A Hsiao; K Kurokawa
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Minimally invasive and open surgical treatment of proximal tibia fractures using a polyaxial locking plate system: a prospective multi-centre study.

Authors:  Jens A Jöckel; Johannes Erhardt; Miscia Vincenti; Jörg Reissig; Reinhard Hoffmann; Baher Husain; Gert Täger; Axel Partenheimer; Helmut Lill; Florian Gebhard; Götz Röderer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A randomized comparison of locking and non-locking palmar plating for unstable Colles' fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  M Koshimune; M Kamano; K Takamatsu; H Ohashi
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2005-10

8.  A prospective, randomized trial comparing the limited contact dynamic compression plate with the point contact fixator for forearm fractures.

Authors:  Frankie Leung; Shew-Ping Chow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Internal plate fixation of fractures: short history and recent developments.

Authors:  Hans K Uhthoff; Philippe Poitras; David S Backman
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.601

10.  Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey.

Authors:  S Fukuhara; J E Ware; M Kosinski; S Wada; B Gandek
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporotic ankle fractures: A narrative review of management options.

Authors:  Mandeep S Dhillon; Rajesh Kumar Rajnish; Sandeep Patel; Devendra K Chouhan; Tungish Bansal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-11-04

2.  Preliminary biomechanical study of different acetabular reinforcement devices for acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  Ching-Lung Tai; Po-Yi Lee; Pang-Hsing Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Locking versus Non-locking Neutralization Plates with Limited Excision and Internal Fixation for Treatment of Extra-articular Type a Distal Tibial Fractures.

Authors:  Kai-Hua Zhou; Nong Chen
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-02-28

4.  Is early full weight bearing safe following locking plate ORIF of distal fibula fractures?

Authors:  Michael Zyskowski; Markus Wurm; Frederik Greve; Sebastian Pesch; Francesca von Matthey; Patrick Pflüger; Moritz Crönlein; Peter Biberthaler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Fibula fractures management.

Authors:  Gianluca Canton; Andrea Sborgia; Guido Maritan; Roberto Fattori; Federico Roman; Marko Tomic; Massimo Max Morandi; Luigi Murena
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-18

6.  One-Third Tubular Plate Remains a Clinically Good Option in Danis-Weber Type B Distal Fibular Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Ahn; Sung Hyun Cho; Mingi Jeong; Yoon-Chung Kim
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Tubular vs Profile Plate in Peroneal or Bimalleolar Fractures: is There a Real Difference in Skin Complication? A Retrospective Study in Three Level I Trauma Center.

Authors:  Rosario Petruccelli; Michele Bisaccia; Giuseppe Rinonapoli; Giuseppe Rollo; Luigi Meccariello; Gabriele Falzarano; Paolo Ceccarini; Olga Bisaccia; Marco Giaracuni; Auro Caraffa
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2017-08

8.  Treating AO/OTA 44B lateral malleolar fracture in patients over 50 years of age: periarticular locking plate versus non-locking plate.

Authors:  Chien-An Shih; I-Ming Jou; Pei-Yuan Lee; Chin-Li Lu; Wei-Ren Su; Ming-Long Yeh; Po-Ting Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Operative Fixation of Lateral Malleolus Fractures With Locking Plates vs Nonlocking Plates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nesar Ahmad Hasami; Diederik Pieter Johan Smeeing; Albert Frederik Pull Ter Gunne; Michael John Richard Edwards; Stijn Diederik Nelen
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 10.  Interventions for treating ankle fractures in children.

Authors:  Denise E Yeung; Xueli Jia; Clare A Miller; Simon L Barker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.